يُخَٰدِعُونَ ٱللَّهَ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ وَمَا يَخْدَعُونَ إِلَّآ أَنفُسَهُمْ وَمَا يَشْعُرُونَ

“They think to beguile Allah and those who believe, and they beguile none save themselves; but they perceive not.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the expression in the verse describes that no one in the heavens and on earth knows when they will be resurrected from their graves; it also expresses that the hypocrites are unaware of how they have angered their Lord through their evil state, disbelief, doubt and denial, and that they are in a blindness regarding this matter.

إعلاما منه عباده المؤمنين أن المنافقين بإساءتهم إلى أنفسهم في إسخاطهم ربهم بكفرهم وشكهم وتكذيبهم غير شاعرين ولا دارين، ولكنهم على عمياء من أمرهم مقيمون
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

Zemahşerî addresses two separate issues in this section: first, he states that the harm they cause will only return to themselves and will not reach the Prophet, and he relates that some have interpreted this verse concerning Abu Talib, that he prevented the Quraysh from touching the Prophet but did not believe. In the second part, he explains that the expression 'idrâke ilmihim fi'l-âhirah' in the phrase 'bel yeş'urûn' is said through mockery (tehekküm), and that this actually means the most eloquent rejection of knowledge of the afterlife; he notes that according to the interrogative reading (istifham), the meaning differs.

وقيل : هو أبو طالب لأنه كان ينهى قريشا عن التعرض لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وينأى عنه ولا يؤمن به
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the expression 'muhadea' (deception) can be explained in two ways: either the hypocrites cannot actually deceive Allah but only deprive themselves of goodness, or according to the view of the majority, the consequence of their deception returns to them in this world, because Allah turns away the harm of their scheming from the believers and directs it toward themselves. Additionally, the text mentions that the hypocrites show faith toward the Prophet while concealing their disbelief.

أنه تعالى يجازيهم على ذلك ويعاقبهم عليه فلا يكونون في الحقيقة خادعين إلا أنفسهم عن الحسن
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Kurtubî, the hypocrites' attempt to deceive Allah and the believers actually turns against them, because in reality, one who tries to deceive someone who knows the inner truth has only deceived himself. This situation is proof that the hypocrites do not know Allah properly, for if they knew Him, they would know that He cannot be deceived. Additionally, the expression 'wa mâ yeş'urûn' is explained as their not being aware that the consequence of this deception and scheming will return to them.

ودل هذا على أن المنافقين لم يعرفوا الله إذ لو عرفوه لعرفوا أنه لا يخدع وقد تقدم من قوله عليه السلام أنه قال : ( لا تخادع الله فإنه من يخادع الله يخدعه الله ونفسه يخدع لو يشعر
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this text, the hypocrites, through their disbelief and denial, are actually causing harm to their own souls and angering Allah; however, they are not aware of this and think they are deceiving Allah and the believers. The hypocrite's 'deception' is showing on his tongue something different from what he believes through dissimulation (taqiyya); this stems from fear of life, blood and property. In reality, this deception ultimately returns to his own soul, because it drives it toward punishment and wrath.

لا تمتنع العرب أن تسمي من أعطى بلسانه غير الذي في ضميره تقية لينجو مما هو له خائف مخادعا
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, the expression of the hypocrites 'deceiving Allah and the believers' cannot be taken in its literal sense, because nothing is hidden from Allah and they did not intend to deceive Allah anyway. Therefore, the expression either means the deception of the Messenger through the omission of the indirect object (mudâf hazf), or treating the Messenger is equivalent to treating Allah; or the hypocrites' showing faith and concealing disbelief is likened to Allah applying Islamic rulings to them, appearing as a mutual deception. Additionally, in the expression 'wa mâ yahdeûn illâ enfüsehüm', it is stated that at the end of the circle of deception it returns to themselves, that they deceive their own souls.

وخداعهم مع الله ليس على ظاهره لأنه لا تخفى عليه خافية، ولأنهم لم يقصدوا خديعته. بل المراد إما مخادعة رسوله على حذف المضاف، أو على أن معاملة الرسول معاملة الله من حيث إنه خليفته

Comparison

Common ground

Zemahşerî, Fahreddin er-Râzî, Kurtubî, İbn Kesîr and Beydâvî agree on the point that the hypocrites' attempt to deceive Allah and the believers does not harm Allah but only turns against themselves. Furthermore, most exegetes interpret the expression 'wa mâ yeş'urûn/yahdeûn' in a way that emphasizes that the hypocrites are unaware of this situation and do not know that they are deceiving themselves. Linguistic and rhetorical analysis (word roots, verb forms, variant readings) is a common method among almost all exegetes.

Differences

While Taberî, the earliest exegete, approaches the verse in a broader contextual and tradition-based framework, connecting it to the matter that no one in the heavens and earth knows the time of the resurrection, others (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Kurtubî, İbn Kesîr, Beydâvî) focus directly on the concept of 'muhâdea/deception'. Zemahşerî emphasizes rhetorical subtleties such as mockery and interrogative reading and also presents a different historical-political context by relating the tradition of Abu Talib. While Râzî explains 'muhadea' with two possibilities and prefers the majority view, Kurtubî bases it on an epistemological argument founded on 'the impossibility of trying to deceive Allah who knows the inner truth' and details variant readings (yuhâdi'ûne/yahda'ûne). Ibn Kesîr shifts the matter more into a socio-psychological explanation in the context of 'dissimulation' and fear of life, blood and property, while Beydâvî offers a more technical/theological analysis such as the omission of the indirect object (mudâf hazf), the derived form (mufâale), and metaphorical likeness (treating the Messenger being equivalent to treating Allah). These differences stem from the scholars' sectarian tendencies (Taberî's tradition-focused approach, Zemahşerî's Mu'tazilite rhetorical emphasis, Râzî's theological-logical analysis, Kurtubî's jurisprudential-hadith supported reading, Ibn Kesîr's tradition-based exegesis, Beydâvî's summary and linguistic-synthetic style).

Historical context

Taberî, the earliest exegete (3rd/9th century), addresses the verse in a broader contextual and tradition-based framework, while later scholars (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Kurtubî, İbn Kesîr, Beydâvî - 6th-8th/12th-14th centuries) increasingly turned toward more technical linguistic and rhetorical analyses focused on the concept of 'muhâdea'. This shows that the exegetical tradition evolved over time from a tradition-focused approach to linguistic and theological deepening; however, the fundamental message - that hypocrites deceive themselves and are unaware of this - remains constant throughout all periods. The rhetorical-centered reading that began with Zemahşerî (mockery, interrogative reading, derived form) became more systematic in later exegetes (especially in Beydâvî), while Kurtubî enriched the linguistic diversity by also including variant readings in this line.

Modern connection

This verse reminds us today that a person deceiving himself actually causes the most harm to his own self and inner peace; acting with sincerity can be an important balancing element for both individual morality and social trust. The exegetes' way of deepening the same essence through language and context in different periods offers a cautious example of how understanding the text and harmony between knowledge and faith have been enriched over time. This perspective can be thought of as a general reminder of the importance of sincerity, awareness and honesty in family and community relationships.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar