فِى قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ فَزَادَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ مَرَضًا وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌۢ بِمَا كَانُوا۟ يَكْذِبُونَ
“In their hearts is a disease, and Allah increaseth their disease. A painful doom is theirs because they lie.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
Taberî explains this verse by stating that those with sickness in their hearts are hypocrites, and the word 'marad' (sickness) here is used not in the sense of physical illness but in the sense of doubt in religion and hypocrisy. The mention of heart sickness is actually an indirect expression through metonymy of their doubt and hesitation in faith; they neither believe with confirmation nor deny with disbelief, but rather waver between the two.
وإنما عنى تبارك وتعالى بخبره عن مرض قلوبهم الخبر عن مرض ما في قلوبهم من الاعتقاد، ولكن لما كان معلوما بالخبر عن مرض القلب أنه معني به مرض ما هم معتقدوه من الاعتقاد استغنى بالخبر عن القلب بذلك، والكناية عن تصريح الخبر عن ضمائرهم واعتقاداتهم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî in this passage connects the establishment of hypocrisy in the hearts of hypocrites and their inability to be freed from it until death to their failure to keep their promise of charity and prayer to Allah and their being exposed as liars. He also specifies that the pronoun refers to Allah, explaining that Allah left them to ruin/hypocrisy ('hazele') for this reason. He also makes reference to a statement regarding the fact that turning back from one's promise is considered a sign of hypocrisy.
والمعنى : فخذلهم حتى نافقوا وتمكن في قلوبهم نفاقهم فلا ينفك عنها إلى أن يموتوا بسبب إخلافهم ما وعدوا الله من التصدق والصلاح وكونهم كاذبين . ومنه : جعل خلف الوعد ثلث النفاق
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
Râzî begins by defining heart sickness ('maraz'): sickness is a quality that causes harm in the actions that proceed from the place where that quality exists; since the inherent effect specific to the heart is knowledge of Allah, obedience to Him, and worship of Him, when qualities form in the heart that obstruct these effects, these are counted as heart sickness. He conveys five reasons of the Mu'tazila regarding the fact that it is not permissible for Allah to create disbelief and ignorance as actions, and argues that for this reason the expression 'fa zâdahümullâhu maradan' (so Allah increased them in sickness) needs to be reinterpreted. As an interpretation, he states that sickness means 'grief/sorrow' and that when the hypocrites saw that the Prophet's work was rising day by day, their sorrow increased, and Allah added sorrow to this sorrow; secondly, he notes that with the increase in religious obligations, their disbelief and sicknesses increased.
فإن قيل : الزيادة من جنس المزيد عليه ، فلو كان المراد من المرض ههنا الكفر والجهل لكان قوله : محمولا على الكفر والجهل ، فيلزم أن يكون الله تعالى فاعلا للكفر والجهل . قالت المعتزلة : لا يجوز أن يكون مراد الله تعالى منه فعل الكفر والجهل لوجوه
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the sickness in the expression 'there is sickness in their hearts' is a metaphor expressing the corruption in the beliefs of hypocrites, and this is either doubt and hypocrisy or denial and falsification. For the expression 'Allah increased their sickness,' two views are reported: one being that this is a curse against the hypocrites, and the other being that Allah is reporting that their sickness increased. The people of meaning ('arbâb-ı meânî) interpreted this as inclination toward the world, love for it, and heedlessness of the afterlife, and Junayd said that heart sicknesses arise from following the self, while bodily sicknesses arise from the organs.
والمرض عبارة مستعارة للفساد الذي في عقائدهم وذلك إما أن يكون شكا ونفاقا وإما جحدا وتكذيبا والمعنى : قلوبهم مرضى لخلوها عن العصمة والتوفيق والرعاية والتأييد
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the expression 'sickness in their hearts' primarily means doubt ('shak'); Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, Ikrimah, Hasan al-Basri, Abu'l-Aliyah, Rabî' b. Enes, and Katadah hold this view. In another narration that Dahhâk transmitted from Ibn Abbas, however, this sickness is explained as hypocrisy, and the sickness that Allah increased is interpreted as the increase of their hypocrisy. Abdurrahman b. Zayd b. Aslem noted that this is not a bodily but a religious sickness—the doubt that fell into the hypocrites when they entered Islam.
في قلوبهم مرض قال شك وكذلك قال مجاهد وعكرمة والحسن البصري وأبو العالية والربيع أبن أنس وقتادة وعن عكرمة وطاوس يعني الرياء وقال الضحاك عن ابن عباس في قلوبهم مرض قال نفاق فزادهم الله مرضا قال نفاقا
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâwî, 'maraz' is used both in its real sense of bodily sickness and metaphorically for spiritual defects (ignorance, bad belief, envy, rancor, love of sin); the verse can carry both meanings. The hearts of the hypocrites suffered pain from the regret and envy they felt upon seeing the elevation of the Prophet's work, and Allah increased this pain; moreover, the disbelief and bad belief in their hearts also increased by their nature. According to another possibility, 'maraz' is the cowardice and weakness that befell their hearts when they saw the strength of the Muslims and their support by the angels.
والآية الكريمة تحتملهما فإن قلوبهم كانت متألمة تحرقا على ما فات عنهم من الرياسة، وحسدا على ما يرون من ثبات أمر الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم واستعلاء شأنه يوما فيوما، وزاد الله غمهم بما زاد في إعلاء أمره وإشادة ذكره
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes agree that the expression 'sickness in their hearts' is not bodily but spiritual/religious sickness; it is commonly accepted that this sickness belongs to the hypocrites and means doubt ('shak'), hypocrisy, and corruption in belief. While Taberî, Kurtubî, and Ibn Kesîr directly characterize this interpretation as metaphor/metonymy, all of them rely on the chain of narration coming from early exegetes such as Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, and Katadah. Furthermore, most exegetes (Taberî, Kurtubî, and Beydâwî) employ the method of linguistic and rhetorical analysis (metaphor-literal, metonymy).
Differences
While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr follow a primarily narrative-based method and confine themselves to transmitting the views of the predecessors, Zemahşerî presents a rhetoric-centered reading through the permanence of hypocrisy and the concept of 'hazele' (abandonment) attributed to Allah. Râzî, on the other hand, takes the matter directly into a theological discussion; he reinterprets the expression 'Allah increased their sickness,' which conflicts with Mu'tazili views, by drawing 'maraz' toward the meaning of grief/sorrow, which reflects his identity as a theologian in the text. Kurtubî adds a Sufi/allusive dimension alongside his linguistic metonymy explanation by referring to the people of meaning and Junayd; this is a difference not seen in the others. Beydâwî, on the other hand, adopts a more synthetic stance by showing both the literal and figurative meanings as simultaneously possible and also presents cowardice/weakness as an interpretation.
Historical context
Taberî, the earliest-period exegete, mainly bases himself on narration and the views of Companions and Successors, providing a straightforward metonymy interpretation; this line is largely preserved until Ibn Kesîr. In later linguist-rhetorician exegetes like Zemahşerî and Beydâwî, the subject is enriched with metonymy and linguistic subtleties, while in Râzî, with the development of theological science, theological discussions (particularly the Mu'tazila-Ahl al-Sunnah disagreement) are incorporated into exegesis. In Kurtubî, an allusive interpretation layer is added with the influence of Sufism. Thus, while the fundamental meaning of the verse (hypocrisy/doubt) remains stable, as time progresses, the methods of interpretation have expanded from narration to linguistic analysis, and from there to theological and Sufi layers.
Modern connection
This verse reminds contemporary humanity that 'sickness' in the heart is not bodily but a spiritual state, and suggests that doubt, duplicity, and doctrinal inconsistency can undermine personal and social well-being. When the approaches of exegetes—linguistic, theological, and allusive—are considered together, it can be said that establishing balance between knowledge and meaning, and the effort to purify the heart ('ikhlas') is a perpetual moral goal in every era. In this context, conducting self-examination with patience and sincerity can be considered a prudent suggestion both for individual well-being and for social solidarity.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar