وَإِذْ قُلْتُمْ يَٰمُوسَىٰ لَن نَّصْبِرَ عَلَىٰ طَعَامٍ وَٰحِدٍ فَٱدْعُ لَنَا رَبَّكَ يُخْرِجْ لَنَا مِمَّا تُنۢبِتُ ٱلْأَرْضُ مِنۢ بَقْلِهَا وَقِثَّآئِهَا وَفُومِهَا وَعَدَسِهَا وَبَصَلِهَا قَالَ أَتَسْتَبْدِلُونَ ٱلَّذِى هُوَ أَدْنَىٰ بِٱلَّذِى هُوَ خَيْرٌ ٱهْبِطُوا۟ مِصْرًا فَإِنَّ لَكُم مَّا سَأَلْتُمْ وَضُرِبَتْ عَلَيْهِمُ ٱلذِّلَّةُ وَٱلْمَسْكَنَةُ وَبَآءُو بِغَضَبٍ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا۟ يَكْفُرُونَ بِـَٔايَٰتِ ٱللَّهِ وَيَقْتُلُونَ ٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ بِغَيْرِ ٱلْحَقِّ ذَٰلِكَ بِمَا عَصَوا۟ وَّكَانُوا۟ يَعْتَدُونَ
“And when ye said: O Moses! We are weary of one kind of food; so call upon thy Lord for us that He bring forth for us of that which the earth groweth - of its herbs and its cucumbers and its corn and its lentils and its onions. He said: Would ye exchange that which is higher for that which is lower? Go down to settled country, thus ye shall get that which ye demand. And humiliation and wretchedness were stamped upon them and they were visited with wrath from Allah. That was because they disbelieved in Allah's revelations and slew the prophets wrongfully. That was for their disobedience and transgression.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, Moses condemned his people's desire to exchange something of lesser value and lower rank (things that grow from the earth such as beans, cucumbers, garlic, lentils, onions) for something more beneficial and superior (manna and quails). Following this request, the Children of Israel were marked with humiliation and destitution, and incurred Allah's wrath. The reason for this situation was that despite being given shade, manna, and quails in Tih, they became weary of these blessings and longed for their former foods from Egypt.
قال لهم موسى: أتأخذون الذي هو أخس خطرا وقيمة وقدرا من العيش، بدلا بالذي هو خير منه خطرا وقيمة وقدرا. وذلك كان استبدالهم.
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî addresses several different points of the verses together in this passage: he indicates that the expression 'ask your Lord for us by what He has covenanted with you' can mean either asking for supplication by swearing by Allah's covenant with the prophet or requesting supplication by taking this covenant as a means. Additionally, he states that the phrase 'bighayri al-haqq' (without right) in the expression 'they act arrogantly in the earth without right' can relate to a state or action because arrogance belongs only to Allah, and the situation in which wrongdoing can be justified is when Muslims gain dominance over the lands of disbelievers. Finally, by transmitting the report that if Ibrahim (the prophet's son) had lived he would have been a prophet, he explains that Tahir, Tayyib, and Qasim were excluded from the negation ruling in the verse 'and he was not a father of your men' on account of shirk and idolatry.
وأن يكون صلة لفعل التكبر ، أي يتكبرون بما ليس بحق وما هم عليه من دينهم والبغي لا يكون بحق ؟ قلت : بلى ، وهو استيلاء المسلمين على أرض الكفرة ، وهدم دورهم ، وإحراق زروعهم وقطع أشجارهم كما فعل رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ببني قريظة
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Râzî argues that the Children of Israel's desire, having become weary of one type of food from Moses (namely sudra bread and quails) and asking for vegetables that the earth produces (garlic/onion, lentils, onion, cucumber), was not a rebellion or sin but a permissible request. He also lists the reasons for this request (becoming tired of eating the same food for forty years, inclination toward habits, weariness from remaining in Tih) and discusses in detail that Moses' use of the expressions 'lower/better' does not necessitate considering this request sinful.
فثبت بما ذكرنا أن ذلك السؤال ما كان معصية بل كان سؤالا مباحا
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the Children of Israel's statement 'we are weary of one food' stemmed from their becoming tired of manna and quails in the Tih desert and remembering their former way of life in Egypt. Although manna and quails were two, they are called 'one food' either because they ate them together or because they were consumed as food that was repeated every day. Additionally, a view transmitted from some interpreters is mentioned, namely that they interpreted this in the sense of wealth or sufficiency, meaning they desired that everyone become wealthy without being dependent on one another.
كان هذا القول منهم في التيه حين ملوا المن والسلوى وتذكروا عيشهم الأول بمصر قال الحسن : كانوا نتاني أهل كراث وأبصال وأعداس فنزعوا إلى عكرهم عكر السوء واشتاقت طباعهم إلى ما جرت عليه عادتهم فقالوا : لن نصبر على طعام واحد وكنوا عن المن والسلوى بطعام واحد وهما اثنان لأنهم كانوا يأكلون أحدهما بالآخر فلذلك قالوا : طعام واحد
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, the verse evaluates the Children of Israel's desire, after leaving Egypt, to request vulgar foods such as vegetables, lentils, onions, and fom (garlic or wheat) instead of sudra bread and quails, as a request stemming from spoiledness by belittling the comfortable and lawful life they were in. These requests were not fulfilled; instead they were punished with the mark of humiliation and destitution. This humiliation and destitution is a permanent condition imposed upon them because of their denial of Allah's signs, their unjust opposition to the prophets and their killing of them.
ولما كان سؤالهم هذا من باب البطر والأشر ولا ضرورة فيه لم يجابوا إليه والله أعلم يقول تعالى أي وضعت عليهم وألزموا بها شرعا وقدرا أي لا يزالون مستذلين من وجدهم استذلهم وأهانهم وضرب عليهم الصغار وهم مع ذلك في أنفسهم أذلاء متمسكنون
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Beydâvî explains in this section that the Children of Israel, having become weary of one type of food (sudra bread and quails), requested vegetables, cucumbers, garlic, lentils, and onions from Moses; that this was preferring something lower to something more beneficial; that as a result they were ordered to descend to Egypt and humiliation and destitution were struck upon them. This humiliation and destitution is because of their denial of Allah's signs, their unjust killing of the prophets, their rebellion and transgression; it is pointed out that minor sins lead to major sins.
فإن صغار الذنوب سبب يؤدي إلى ارتكاب كبارها
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî all read the Children of Israel's weariness with manna and quails and their request for vulgar foods from Egypt (vegetables, garlic, lentils, onions) as a desire to exchange a superior blessing for something of lesser value, and they all relate this situation to the punishment of humiliation and destitution. Râzî, on the other hand, discusses on a different axis that this request should not be considered sinful; Zemahşerî remains outside the common theme because it addresses completely different verse passages in the text (the request for supplication, arrogance, the matter of Ibrahim's son).
Differences
While Râzî defends the request as a permissible one and opposes the attribution of sin based on the principle of the infallibility of prophets, Taberî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî view it as spoiledness and ingratitude and count humiliation-destitution as the consequence of this behavior. Kurtubî presents different possibilities in the linguistic explanation of the expression 'one food' (togetherness, repetition, and the interpretation of wealth/sufficiency), thereby displaying a more pluralist approach. Zemahşerî addresses the subject in a completely different context (supplication, arrogance, the matter of lineage), so the ground for comparison is partly different. These divergences stem from differences between schools: language/rhetoric-focused methodology (Zemahşerî, Kurtubî), narration/early sources-weighted methodology (Taberî, Ibn Kesîr), and rational-jurisprudential reasoning (Râzî).
Historical context
While the early-period exegete Taberî provides a narration-weighted framework, in later periods Zemahşerî and Râzî foreground language and reason-based inquiry; Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr continue the narration tradition while also opening space for alternative interpretations. Beydâvî harmonizes this accumulated knowledge in a synthesizing manner. Thus, the basic narrative remained stable over time, but the methodology of interpretation expanded from narration toward language and reason-based discussion.
Modern connection
These different readings offer a general reminder that failing to recognize the value of possessed blessings and turning toward something more ordinary can damage one's consciousness of patience and gratitude. A person not belittling the resources at hand and requesting their needs in a measured manner can be a thought-provoking example from the perspective of social peace and the morality of gratitude. Moreover, the exegetes' different approaches demonstrate how a balance is achieved in the scholarly tradition when evaluating a subject by considering language, reason, and narration together, which is instructive.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar