أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ خَرَجُوا۟ مِن دِيَٰرِهِمْ وَهُمْ أُلُوفٌ حَذَرَ ٱلْمَوْتِ فَقَالَ لَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ مُوتُوا۟ ثُمَّ أَحْيَٰهُمْ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَذُو فَضْلٍ عَلَى ٱلنَّاسِ وَلَٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ ٱلنَّاسِ لَا يَشْكُرُونَ
“Bethink thee (O Muhammad) of those of old, who went forth from their habitations in their thousands, fearing death, and Allah said unto them: Die; and then He brought them back to life. Lo! Allah is a Lord of Kindness to mankind, but most of mankind give not thanks.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, this verse explains Allah's grace toward the disbelievers and polytheists in granting them respite despite their sins and disbelief, rather than punishing them immediately. Furthermore, the story mentioned in the context of the verse refers to a community that fled their homeland in thousands out of fear of death, whom Allah killed and then revived through the supplication of a prophet. Taberî transmits different reports from exegetes such as Ibn Abbas, Wahb b. Munabbih, and as-Suddi, and narrates their disagreements concerning the number of this community (four thousand, eight thousand, more than thirty thousand, forty thousand) and the reason for their flight (plague, fleeing from jihad).
قال: كانوا أربعة آلاف خرجوا فرارا من الطاعون، فأماتهم الله، فمر عليهم نبي من الأنبياء، فدعا ربه أن يحييهم حتى يعبدوه، فأحياهم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zamakhshari, Allah's grace upon humans is manifested through giving them reason, sending revelation, and teaching them the lawful and unlawful; yet despite this, humans fall into polytheism and do not recognize this grace. According to an alternative view, this grace is that Allah places evidence that all can observe and reason from equally, but most people follow their desires and do not look at these proofs, remaining as disbelieving ingrates.
وقد نصب مثل تلك الأدلة لسائر الناس من غير تفاوت ، ولكن أكثر الناس لا ينظرون ولا يستدلون اتباعا لأهوائهم ، فيبقون كافرين غير شاكرين
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubi lists many different views concerning the number of the community mentioned in this verse (hundreds of thousands, eighty thousand, forty thousand, thirty thousand, seven thousand, three thousand, among others); however, because the word 'ألوف' is a plural of multitude and is not used for numbers below ten, he prefers that their numbers were more than ten thousand. Furthermore, according to Ibn Zayd's view, the word 'ألوف' does not express the number of the community but rather indicates that they were in harmony without division and discord (مؤتلفون) among themselves; however, when a group fled from death seeking safety and separated from the community, Allah killed them.
والصحيح أنهم زادوا على عشرة آلاف لقوله تعالى : وهم ألوف وهو جمع الكثرة ولا يقال في عشرة فما دونها ألوف
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kathir explains this verse with the story of a community from the Children of Israel who, while fleeing from plague, gathered in a valley and were collectively killed by Allah through two angels, and then revived through a prophet named Hezekiel. In this story, he notes that there is a lesson and admonition that fleeing from fate avails nothing and that the one to flee to is again Allah. He also emphasizes that this event constitutes conclusive proof that physical resurrection on the Day of Judgment will take place.
وفي هذه القصة عبرة ودليل على أنه لن يغني حذر من قدر وأنه لا ملجأ من الله إلا إليه فان هؤلاء خرجوا فرارا من الوباء طلبا لطول الحياة فعوملوا بنقيض قصدهم وجاءهم الموت سريع في آن واحد
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Baydawi, the verse speaks of a community that fled their homes out of fear of death; these could be the people of Davardan village who fled from plague, or a group of the Children of Israel who fled from their king's call to jihad. Allah killed them and then revived them so that they would understand that escape from fate and decree is impossible and would take admonition. The benefit of the story is to encourage Muslims toward jihad and martyrdom and to instill reliance on Allah and submission to divine decree.
فأماتهم الله ثم أحياهم ليعتبروا ويتيقنوا أن لا مفر من قضاء الله تعالى وقدره. أو قوما من بني إسرائيل دعاهم ملكهم إلى الجهاد ففروا حذر الموت فأماتهم الله ثمانية أيام ثم أحياهم.
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the text transmits a report that the verse of charity in Sura 2:245 is explained by a narration showing to whom charity should be given according to the number of dinars (oneself, family, servants, parents, relatives, and lastly in the way of Allah). He also notes that the custom of the Qur'an is to mix together matters of monotheism, exhortation and advice, and legal rulings. Furthermore, he discusses that news concerning the resurrection of the dead must be accepted with certainty in terms of both possibility and veracity.
قال عطاء : عن ابن عباس نزلت هذه الآية في رجل أتى للنبي عليه الصلاة والسلام فقال إن لي دينارا فقال : أنفقه على نفسك
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubi, Ibn Kathir, and Baydawi commonly connect the verse to the story of a large community that fled their homes out of fear of death and was killed by Allah and then revived; they read this event as a scene of admonition regarding the impossibility of escaping fate and the possibility of resurrection after death. Although Zamakhshari and al-Razi differ in their approach, all exegetes employ transmitted material along with linguistic and rhetorical analysis.
Differences
While Taberî, Kurtubi, and Baydawi primarily focus on differences in transmitted reports regarding the number of the community (from four thousand to reports reaching hundreds of thousands) and the reason for their flight (plague or fleeing from jihad), Kurtubi also transmits the view that the word 'ألوف' may indicate the community's harmony and unity rather than their number. Ibn Kathir strengthens the narration by connecting it to the event of plague during Umar's journey to the Levant and considers the story conclusive proof of physical resurrection. Zamakhshari, on the other hand, takes a completely different direction by interpreting the verse through a rational and logical lens based on reason, revelation, and gratitude; al-Razi connects the text to the charity verse and addresses it through the Qur'an's style of interweaving subjects. These differences stem from the exegetes' methodological preferences between transmission-oriented approaches (Taberî, Ibn Kathir) and rational reasoning approaches (Zamakhshari, al-Razi).
Historical context
Taberî, the earliest period exegete, extensively transmits reports and presents disagreements as they are, while later period exegetes (Zamakhshari, al-Razi) give greater space to linguistic and rational interpretations; Kurtubi and Ibn Kathir compile transmitted material and harmonize it with rhetorical rules, producing a more systematic synthesis. In Baydawi, a concise synthesis emerges with moral and educational messages of the story (reliance on Allah, encouragement toward jihad) taking prominence. The fundamental story and the main idea regarding resurrection remain constant throughout the periods, with differences observed in details and methodological emphases.