كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ ٱلْقِتَالُ وَهُوَ كُرْهٌ لَّكُمْ وَعَسَىٰٓ أَن تَكْرَهُوا۟ شَيْـًٔا وَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ وَعَسَىٰٓ أَن تُحِبُّوا۟ شَيْـًٔا وَهُوَ شَرٌّ لَّكُمْ وَٱللَّهُ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ

“Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

Taberî interprets this verse as explaining that Allah knows the condition of those who lied in the incident of the false accusation (ifk), whereas humans cannot know this because they are unable to know the unseen. In connection with this, the text conveys the disagreement regarding against whom the obligation of fighting is directed; according to some scholars, this is exclusive to the companions of the Prophet, while according to the majority, it is an obligation that falls upon some Muslims (like a communal obligation) on behalf of others. It is also stated that the word 'karh' means not liking war, and that Allah knows the good and evil that His servants do not know.

وقال آخرون: هو على كل واحد حتى يقوم به من في قيامه الكفاية، فيسقط فرض ذلك حينئذ عن باقي المسلمين كالصلاة على الجنائز وغسلهم الموتى ودفنهم، وعلى هذا عامة علماء المسلمين وذلك هو الصواب عندنا لإجماع الحجة على ذلك
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Zemahşerî, this group of verses explains that the incident of the false accusation was a good for the believers, and that the eighteen verses revealed because of that incident carried great benefit in that they glorified the Prophet and comforted him, cleared Aishah and the People of the Prophet's Household. Furthermore, addressing the prohibition of lemz (slander with the tongue) and giving bad nicknames, he states that believers blaming one another is like blaming oneself, that bad nicknames are prohibited, but beautiful nicknames (like patronymic names) are a Sunnah. In this context, the beautiful nicknames of companions such as Abû Bakr, Umar, Hamza, and Khâlid, and the story of Banî Tamîm who mocked those considered weak like Bilâl, Habbâb, and Sâlim, as well as Aishah's words about Zaynab bint Khuzayma and Umm Salama, are mentioned as examples.

ومعنى كونه خيرا لهم : أنهم اكتسبوا فيه الثواب العظيم ؛ لأنه كان بلاء مبينا ومحنة ظاهرة ، وأنه نزلت فيه ثماني عشرة آية كل واحدة منها مستقلة بما هو تعظيم لشأن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this text, Râzî conveys that scholars disagreed on the ruling of jihad: one group said the verses made fighting obligatory for everyone, while according to what is narrated from Ibn Umar and Ata, this ruling is specific only to the companions of the Prophet in that era. He also explains that the verse's expression of 'kurh' (dislike) refers to a hardship that weighs on the obligated person, not a rebellion against Allah's command. The text also emphasizes that regarding the encouragement of jihad, one should know the deficiency of one's own knowledge and the perfection of Allah's knowledge, and therefore should obey His command absolutely.

واختلف العلماء في هذه الآية فقال قوم : إنها تقتضي وجوب القتال على الكل وعن مكحول أنه كان يحلف عند البيت بالله أن الغزو واجب ونقل عن ابن عمر وعطاء : أن هذه الآية تقتضي وجوب القتال على أصحاب الرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام في ذلك الوقت فقط
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Kurtubî, this verse indicates that jihad is an obligation that weighs heavily on the soul; this heaviness stems from reasons such as the spending of wealth, abandonment of homeland and family, exposure of the body to wounds, and the danger of death, not from believers disliking Allah's obligation. When the expression 'it is hoped' comes from Allah, it carries the meaning of obligation (necessity), and here it is stated that jihad, which is disliked, is actually good, and ease which is liked and avoidance of war is actually evil.

وإنما كان الجهاد كرها لأن فيه إخراج المال ومفارقة الوطن والأهل والتعرض بالجسد للشجاج والجراح وقطع الأطراف وذهاب النفس فكانت كراهيتهم لذلك لا أنهم كرهوا فرض الله تعالى
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Ibn Kesîr, this verse conveys that Allah knows the consequences of affairs and the worldly and afterlife benefits of His servants better than people do, and therefore it is necessary to respond to and obey His command. This general principle is supported by the rule that one may find good in something one dislikes (for example, participating in war), and harm in something one likes (staying away from war) such as the enemy gaining victory. In this context, the text narrates the events before the Battle of Badr and the Prophet's consultation with his companions.

وهذا عام في الأمور كلها قد يحب المرء شيئا وليس فيه خيره ولا مصلحة ومن ذلك القعود عن القتال قد يعقبه استيلاء العدو على البلاد والحكم
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, the word 'kurh' expresses that war is something that weighs heavily and is displeasing to humans by nature; this word can be a masdar in the sense of a noun of relation or an object participle for emphasis. It also states that what one dislikes is actually beneficial for oneself, while what one likes can be harmful; this shows that most often the desires of the soul and real benefits are in opposition. It is emphasized that Allah knows what is beneficial, but humans cannot know this.

وعسى أن تكرهوا شيئا وهو خير لكم وهو جميع ما كلفوا به، فإن الطبع يكرهه وهو مناط صلاحهم وسبب فلاحهم. وعسى أن تحبوا شيئا وهو شر لكم وهو جميع ما نهوا عنه، فإن النفس تحبه وتهواه وهو يفضي بها إلى الردى

Comparison

Common ground

Taberî, Râzî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî all emphasize that the word 'kurh' in the verse means jihad is a hardship that weighs on the soul, and does not carry the meaning of rebellion. Moreover, all of them share the principle that Allah's knowledge is superior to His servants' knowledge, and that good can be found in what is disliked, and harm in what is liked. Zemahşerî occupies an exceptional place by focusing on a different group of verses (about false accusation and slander), standing apart from the others.

Differences

While Taberî and Râzî convey the discussion about to whom jihad is obligatory (exclusive to companions or general) based on jurisprudential disagreement, Kurtubî concretizes the reasons for this heaviness (wealth, family, body, death) and supports it with a historical example (Andalusia). Ibn Kesîr provides a narration-based context through the story of Badr; Beydâvî addresses the matter within the framework of linguistic/grammatical analysis and legal principles of benefit. Zemahşerî diverges entirely from the others by turning to a completely different subject, the incident of false accusation and the prohibition of nicknames and slander; this difference likely points to a different context of the verse being discussed.

Historical context

In the process from Taberî to Beydâvî, linguistic analysis and narration transmission continue as an established method, while over time jurisprudential and theological deductions (the principle of benefit, discussions of necessity) became more systematic, and later exegetes like Kurtubî transformed the verse into a contemporary warning with historical examples. The basic interpretive line (the meaning of 'kurh' as hardship, the superiority of Allah's knowledge) has been largely preserved from the early period onwards.

Modern connection

This comparative reading reminds us that a responsibility one dislikes can actually be a means to social or personal good, whereas choosing comfort can sometimes lead to unnoticed harm. This perspective, based on patience and harmony between knowledge and faith, can encourage one to act not according to one's own limited knowledge, but with a broader understanding of benefit. Furthermore, the emphasis on avoiding belittling nicknames and slander towards people carries a thought-provoking resonance in terms of tolerance and social solidarity in modern times.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar