فَإِنْ ءَامَنُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ مَآ ءَامَنتُم بِهِۦ فَقَدِ ٱهْتَدَوا۟ وَّإِن تَوَلَّوْا۟ فَإِنَّمَا هُمْ فِى شِقَاقٍ فَسَيَكْفِيكَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ وَهُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلْعَلِيمُ

“And if they believe in the like of that which ye believe, then are they rightly guided. But if they turn away, then are they in schism, and Allah will suffice thee (for defence) against them. He is the Hearer, the Knower.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Zemahşerî, Allah hears and knows everything that His servants say and do; nothing remains hidden from Him, which is why it behooves His servants to fear and revere Him. Furthermore, a linguistic explanation is provided regarding the context of the verb 'yumid' in the expression 'liqaa' Allah yumid', and its relationship to the arrival of the 'ajal' (appointed term), which is the response to the condition, is clarified.

والضمير في قوله : الذي لا يخفى عليه شيء مما يقوله عباده ومما يفعلونه ، فهو حقيق بالتقوى والخشية
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, 'semi' (All-Hearing) expresses that Allah hears and answers when provision is requested, while 'alim' (All-Knowing) denotes that Allah knows the needs of His servants even in silence and knows the measure of this need. Furthermore, it is noted that the word 'shiqaq' expresses not being on the same side as the other party but being in a separate 'shiqah' (faction) and being separated from the community due to enmity; this expression does not describe ordinary opposition but rather a great opposition that leads a person to merit Allah's enmity and curse. In this case, the characterization in the verse alludes to the fact that the people were enemies of the Prophet and intended to harm him, while Allah protected the Prophet and the believers from their deception and evil.

قال بعض أهل اللغة : الشقاق مأخذو من الشق ، كأنه صار في شق غير شق صاحبه بسبب العداوة وقد شق عصا المسلمين إذا فرق جماعتهم وفارقها ، ونظيره : المحادة وهي أن يكون هذا في حد وذاك في حد آخر
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Kurtubî states in this verse that the promise Allah gave to the Prophet was fulfilled, emphasizing that Allah would suffice him against his enemies and opponents; he conveys that this was historically realized in the events of Banu Qaynuqa, Banu Qurayza, and Banu Nadir. He also explains that the Names 'As-Semi' and 'Al-Alim' point to Allah's knowledge of everything in the words and hearts of His servants.

فكان هذا وعدا من الله تعالى لنبيه عليه السلام أنه سيكفيه من عانده ومن خالفه من المتولين بمن يهديه من المؤمنين فأنجز له الوعد وكان ذلك في قتل بني قينقاع وبني قريظة وإجلاء بني النضير
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, the expression 'if they believe as you believe, they will be rightly guided' is a style of abandonment and silencing; since there is no belief like that in which the idolaters believed and no religion equivalent to Islam, this carries the meaning of a challenge. Furthermore, the possibilities that the letter 'ba' may have the meaning of instrumentality (means), or that the expression 'mithla' may have been brought as an extra emphasis, are also mentioned. In the case of turning away, the promise that Allah will suffice the believers is given, and the Names 'Semi' and 'Alim' are interpreted as either complementary to this promise or as a threat directed at those who turn away.

آمنتم به فقد اهتدوا من باب التعجيز والتبكيت، كقوله تعالى: فأتوا بسورة من مثله إذ لا مثل لما آمن به المسلمون، ولا دين كدين الإسلام.
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

Taberî explains the expression 'fa-in amanu bi-mithli ma amantum bihi' in the verse as follows: if the People of the Book believe as the believers do (in Allah, in all scriptures, and in all prophets), they will have been guided. According to him, the comparison here is not between Allah and a likeness of Him, but between two acts of belief/affirmation; that is, the acts of belief of the believer and the People of the Book are being likened to each other, not a likeness attributed to Allah. For this reason, he also interprets within this framework the reading narrated from Ibn Abbas which could appear to attribute a likeness to Allah, and he states that it contradicts the Mushaf.

فالتشبيه إنما وقع PageEndV02P601 بين التصديقين والإقرارين اللذين هما إيمان هؤلاء وإيمان هؤلاء
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the verse informs that Allah is the One who hears the words of His servants and knows their movements and stillness, their conditions; accordingly, Allah will give everyone who performs an action its recompense. Furthermore, it is explained that Allah holds the dominion of the heavens and the earth in His hand, while the idols worshipped by the idolaters have no power over anything, neither harm nor benefit, and in this worship they merely follow their conjecture and falsehoods.

أي السميع لأقوال عباده العليم بأحوالهم

Comparison

Common ground

All exegetes agree that the Names 'Semi' (All-Hearing) and 'Alim' (All-Knowing) point to Allah's comprehensive knowledge of the words, conditions, and intentions of His servants; this knowledge carries a meaning of reassurance for the believers and a warning/threat for those who oppose. Moreover, most exegetes use linguistic and rhetorical analysis (word root, grammatical parsing, similitude elements) as the basic tool of exegesis.

Differences

While Zemahşerî and Beydâvî concentrate on linguistic subtleties within the verse (verb context, letter functions, emphasis), Fahreddin er-Râzî ties the concept of 'shiqaq' to a theological analysis that elevates it to the degree of meriting Allah's enmity with a kalam-based perspective. While Kurtubî concretizes it with historical sirah events (Banu Qaynuqa, Qurayza, Nadir), Taberî and Ibn Kesîr follow a more narrative method based on predecessor reports and recitation/Mushaf discussions. These differences are related to the school to which the exegetes belonged (linguistic, theological, narrative-salafi) and the primary areas of discussion of their time.

Historical context

Early and middle period exegetes like Taberî and Ibn Kesîr adhered more closely to reports and predecessor views, while later exegetes like Zemahşerî and Beydâvî gave greater weight to linguistic and rhetorical analysis; Râzî occupies an intermediate position by incorporating theological argumentation. The fundamental meaning (that Allah hears and knows everything) remained constant throughout the periods, while the method and points of emphasis diversified over time.

Modern connection

This comparative reading reminds us that a person's words and actions are always within a framework of consciousness and responsibility, calling for developing a sincere attitude. In relationships with people of different thoughts and beliefs, it can point to the importance of establishing a patient, constructive, and tolerant language, and of operating both knowledge and conscience together. This can be thought of as providing a foundation that will strengthen social solidarity and mutual understanding.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar