قُولُوٓا۟ ءَامَنَّا بِٱللَّهِ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰٓ إِبْرَٰهِـۧمَ وَإِسْمَٰعِيلَ وَإِسْحَٰقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَٱلْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ ٱلنَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُۥ مُسْلِمُونَ

“Say (O Muslims): We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto Him we have surrendered.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Taberî, this verse teaches believers the response they should give to the call of Jews and Christians to 'become Jewish or Christian so that you may be guided'. It is necessary to believe collectively in Allah, the Book revealed to the Prophet, what was revealed to Ibrahim, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob and their descendants, the Torah given to Moses, the Gospel given to Jesus, and the Books given to all prophets. This faith should not be in the form of accepting some prophets and rejecting others; rather, instead of testifying some prophets as true and denying others as the Jews and Christians do, it should be witnessed that all of them are messengers sent by Allah upon truth and guidance.

لا نؤمن ببعض الأنبياء ونكفر ببعض، ونتبرأ من بعض، ونتولى بعضا، كما تبرأت اليهود من عيسى ومحمد عليهما السلام وأقرت بغيرهما من الأنبياء، وكما تبرأت النصارى من محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم وأقرت بغيره من الأنبياء؛ بل نشهد لجميعهم أنهم كانوا رسل الله وأنبياءه، بعثوا بالحق والهدى
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

In this text, Râzî first explains that the word 'asbât' means tribe for the Children of Israel, citing Halil and Zemahşerî. Then he gives two interpretations of the phrase 'we make no distinction': not believing in some prophets and denying others, or accepting that their religious principles are not separate and that all of them are united upon Islam. He also notes that the necessity of believing in all prophets has the benefits of proving that the Prophet is one who testifies all prophets and of criticizing the inconsistent sects of the People of the Book that are based on miracles.

أما قوله : ففيه وجهان . الأول : أنا لا نؤمن ببعض ونكفر ببعض ، فإنا لو فعلنا ذلك كانت المناقضة لازمة على الدليل وذلك غير جائز . الثاني : لا نفرق بين أحد منهم ، أي لا نقول : إنهم متفرقون في أصول الديانات ، بل هم مجتمعون على الأصول التي هي الإسلام
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Kurtubî first explains this verse through a hadith and practices of the predecessors: it is recommended that 'we believe in Allah and what is revealed' is said without either confirming or denying what the People of the Book say. Then, according to a narration from Ibn Abbas, the reason for the revelation of the verse is that the Jews asked the Prophet which prophets he believed in, and when it came to Jesus, they refused to believe. The text also discusses in detail the linguistic plural structures of names such as Ibrahim, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, Israel, and the meaning of the word 'asbât' (the twelve sons of Jacob).

قال بن عباس : جاء نفر من اليهود إلى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فسألوه عمن يؤمن به من الأنبياء فنزلت الآية فلما جاء ذكر عيسى قالوا : لا نؤمن بعيسى ولا من آمن به
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

Ibn Kesîr states that the term 'asbât' (descendants/tribes) mentioned in the verse refers to the branches of the Children of Israel spreading from the twelve sons of Prophet Jacob. He explains that revelation to these tribes is mentioned collectively, but there is no definitive proof regarding which specific individuals from these tribes actually received prophethood.

يذكر تعالى أنه أوحى إلى الأنبياء من أسباط بني إسرائيل فذكرهم إجمالا لأنهم كثيرون ولكن كل سبط من نسل رجل من إخوة يوسف ولم يقم دليل على أعيان هؤلاء أنهم أوحي إليهم والله أعلم
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, the verse mentions the Qur'an first because it comes before us or because belief in other books is dependent upon it. He states that what was revealed to Ibrahim, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob and the asbât was 'scrolls', which although originally revealed to Ibrahim, are also counted as revealed to his descendants because they too were bound by these rulings. The reason why Moses and Jesus are mentioned separately with the Torah and Gospel is that the ruling concerning these two books differs from the earlier ones and disagreements are concentrated in them.

وهي وإن نزلت إلى إبراهيم لكنهم لما كانوا متعبدين بتفاصيلها داخلين تحت أحكامها فهي أيضا منزلة إليهم، كما أن القرآن منزل إلينا

Comparison

Common ground

All exegetes agree that the verse teaches belief in all prophets without making distinctions between them; they also concur that the word 'asbât' means the descendants/tribes of Prophet Jacob and that the verse serves as a response to the attitude of the People of the Book of accepting some prophets and rejecting others.

Differences

While Taberî approaches the verse primarily within the contextual framework of responding to the Jewish-Christian call, Kurtubî grounds the issue on a historical basis through hadith and narrations about the reasons for revelation. Râzî takes a theological approach, offering two different interpretations of the phrase 'we make no distinction' and draws attention to its function in proving that the Prophet testified to all prophets. Ibn Kesîr emphasizes with more cautious language that there is no definitive knowledge about who from the asbât were actually prophets; Beydâvî pursues a reading focused on linguistics and rhetoric, explaining the reasons for the order in which the books are mentioned in the verse. These differences stem from the exegetes' differing methods: linguistic, theological, hadith/narration-oriented, or contextual approaches.

Historical context

In the process extending from Taberî to Beydâvî, the fundamental message of the verse—not making distinctions between prophets and believing in all of them—remained constant; however, over time the method of exegesis evolved toward linguistic and theological deepening, and the use of narrations and hadith became more systematic. While contextual-historical reading was dominant in the early period, linguistic analysis and theological discussions came to the fore in later periods.

Modern connection

This comparative reading can point to the importance of a non-discriminatory, inclusive stance in relationships with people from different religious traditions. The principle of not making distinctions between prophets can be understood in the present day as an attitude that nourishes the spirit of tolerance and dialogue. At the same time, this linguistic and historical depth established between knowledge and faith can be shown as an example of promoting a balanced, knowledge-based understanding of belief.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar