وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ ءَامِنُوا۟ كَمَآ ءَامَنَ ٱلنَّاسُ قَالُوٓا۟ أَنُؤْمِنُ كَمَآ ءَامَنَ ٱلسُّفَهَآءُ أَلَآ إِنَّهُمْ هُمُ ٱلسُّفَهَآءُ وَلَٰكِن لَّا يَعْلَمُونَ
“And when it is said unto them: believe as the people believe, they say: shall we believe as the foolish believe? are not they indeed the foolish? But they know not.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Taberî conveys that the term 'the foolish ones' (سفهاء) refers to the hypocrites, and that they characterized the companions of the Prophet as 'foolish ones'. He notes that the word 'fool' means someone ignorant in religion, weak in intellect and judgment, and one who does not know where benefit and harm lie. He explains that while the hypocrites thought they were doing right in their own estimation, they were actually causing harm to their own souls, and this is foolishness in its truest sense.
والسفهاء جمع سفيه، كالعلماء جمع عليم، والحكماء جمع حكيم والسفيه: الجاهل الضعيف الرأي، القليل المعرفة بمواضع المنافع والمضار
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, this verse concerns the polytheists allocating a share from their livestock and crops to idols in an ignorant and unconscious manner, considering this a means of drawing near to the idols. The threatening expression in the verse (the promise that they will be questioned by oath) points to the fact that they will be held accountable for these deeds. Furthermore, it is emphasized that there is no difference between ignorance (the absence of knowledge) and the existence of a limited knowledge that does not transcend worldly matters, because they do not deliberate and reflect since they follow heedlessness and their desires.
أجعلوا لها نصيبا في أنعامهم وزروعهم أم لا ؟ وكانوا يجعلون لهم ذلك تقربا إليهم { لتسئلن } وعيد وفي هذا الإبدال من النكتة أنه أبدله منه ، وجعله بحيث يقوم مقامه ويسد مسده
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
Râzî explains that the term 'the foolish ones' (سفهاء) in the verse means lightness and irrationality from a linguistic perspective; he notes that a person's deviation from the right path in matters of religion should be considered a greater foolishness than deviation in worldly matters. Proceeding from this general principle, he conveys that every disbeliever can be considered a fool, and therefore this expression can be attributed to the Jews, the polytheists, or the hypocrites, and he reports that the exegetes have gone with each of these three views separately.
وبالجملة فإن من لا يميز بين ما له وعليه ، ويعدل عن طريق منافعه إلى ما يضره ، يوصف بالخفة والسفه ، ولا شك أن الخطأ في باب الدين أعظم مضرة منه في باب الدنيا فإذا كان العادل عن الرأي الواضح في أمر دنياه يعد سفيها ، فمن يكون كذلك في أمر دينه كان أولى بهذا الاسم فلا كافر إلا وهو سفيه
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî conveys that the term 'the foolish ones' (سفهاء) in verse 13 of Sura al-Baqara was said by the hypocrites or a group from the People of the Book to belittle the believers (especially those like Abdullah ibn Salâm and his companions). He notes that this statement was made in a concealed and mocking manner, while Allah informed that true foolishness, weakness of intellect, and corruption of understanding belonged to them. He also reports that they could not understand this because of the veil (rayn) upon their hearts.
وهذا القول من المنافقين إنما كانوا يقولونه في خفاء وأستهزاء فأطلع الله نبيه والمؤمنين على ذلك وقرر أن السفه ورقة الحلوم وفساد البصائر إنما هي في حيزهم وصفة لهم وأخبر أنهم هم السفهاء ولكن لا يعلمون للرين الذي على قلوبهم
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, when the hypocrites said 'shall we believe as the people believe', they characterized the companions of the Prophet (whom they meant) as 'foolish ones'. The word 'fool' means an ignorant person, one with weak judgment, one who cannot distinguish between benefits and harms, and in the Qur'an it has also been used for women and children. The fact that the hypocrites did not know how deplorable their own condition was shows that their ignorance and deviation were of an even more advanced degree.
يعنون لعنهم الله أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم رضي الله عنهم قاله أبو العالية والسدي في تفسيره بسنده عن ابن عباس وابن مسعود وغير واحد من الصحابة
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the perfection of faith requires both avoiding the prohibited evils (do not cause corruption) and fulfilling the commanded faith (believe); the name 'the people' (الناس) in the verse refers either to those possessing intellect who represent humanity's perfection, or to the Prophet and his companions, or to those from the People of the Book who believed such as Abdullah ibn Selâm. The characterization of the hypocrites as 'foolish ones' is based either on the corruption of their beliefs, on their being despised because of their poverty, or on their attempt to show indifference toward those who believe. Furthermore, the ignorant person's not knowing their own ignorance is a greater deviation than being in doubt.
من تمام النصح والإرشاد فإن كمال الإيمان بمجموع الأمرين: الإعراض عما لا ينبغي وهو المقصود بقوله: لا تفسدوا، والإتيان بما ينبغي وهو المطلوب بقوله: آمنوا.
Comparison
Common ground
The majority of Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî concur that the term 'the foolish ones' (سفهاء) targeted the hypocrites (sometimes together with a group from the People of the Book), and that this word means weakness of intellect, ignorance, and inability to distinguish between benefit and harm. Moreover, there is a common emphasis that those characterized as foolish (namely the hypocrites/disbelievers) are themselves truly foolish, and the accusation they directed at the other side has returned upon them. Most exegetes, except Râzî, employ both report (narrations from Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, etc.) and linguistic/lexical analysis together.
Differences
Zemahşerî approaches this verse in a completely different context; according to him, the matter is not the hypocrites' belittling of the believers, but rather the polytheists' allocating a share to idols and being held accountable for this—this shows that Zemahşerî is interpreting a different verse (or a different context), thus diverging fundamentally from the others. While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr, employing a narration-focused methodology, decisively settle on the 'hypocrites' view, Râzî, proceeding from linguistic analysis, presents an inclusivist/probabilistic stance by noting that the term 'the foolish ones' can be attributed to the Jews, the polytheists, or the hypocrites—this reflects Râzî's tendency, stemming from his kalâm/logical method, to systematically list different views. Beydâvî, on the other hand, places greater emphasis on linguistic and syntactic analysis, noting that the characterization as 'foolish ones' can be based on three separate reasons (corruption of belief, contempt due to poverty, indifference); this reflects Beydâvî's multi-faceted interpretation technique focused on language within his summary/concise style of exegesis. Kurtubî, meanwhile, concretizes the matter particularly with the example of Abdullah ibn Salâm, giving weight to narratives about the occasions of revelation (asbâb al-nuzûl).
Historical context
The earliest exegete Taberî (3rd/9th century) follows a narration-focused method, collecting the views of the companions and successors, while using linguistic analysis in a supporting role. With Zemahşerî (6th/12th century), the influence of the Mu'tazilite-rhetoric school is evident in the verse being read in a different context (rhetorical arts, the emphasis on threat/warning)—this reflects the era's linguistic/rhetorical exegetical trend. Râzî (late 6th/12th-early 7th/13th century), with his kalâm methodology, systematizes different views and presents possibilities; this demonstrates the Ash'arite school of kalâm's tradition of multi-faceted reasoning. Kurtubî (7th/13th century) returns to narration and occasions of revelation with his jurist identity, while Ibn Kesîr (8th/14th century), following the salafî line, gives weight to narration-based exegesis, remaining close to Taberî's approach. Beydâvî (late 7th/13th century) represents a continuation of a summary and language-focused exegetical tradition (influenced by Zemahşerî). In conclusion, while the narration-focused 'hypocrites' interpretation dominated in the early period, the variety of interpretation increased in later periods with linguistic and rhetorical analysis coming to the fore, yet the fundamental meaning (that true foolishness belongs to the side making the accusation) remained fixed.
Modern connection
This verse draws attention to the importance of questioning one's own conduct before accusing another of foolishness or worthlessness; the common emphasis of the exegetes is the reality that the accusation directed at others often returns to the accuser. In contemporary times as well, in social relations, within families, or in dialogue with those holding different views, approaching the other party with self-criticism and forbearance rather than hastily judging them can be evaluated as a constructive attitude from both individual moral and social harmony perspectives. The fact that the exegetes enrich the same verse through different methods (narration, language, kalâm) offers a cautious example of how a pluralistic and respectful approach is possible within the tradition of learning.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar