صِرَٰطَ ٱلَّذِينَ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ غَيْرِ ٱلْمَغْضُوبِ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا ٱلضَّآلِّينَ
“The path of those whom Thou hast favoured; Not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
Taberî attributes to some Basra grammarians the view that the letter 'lâ' in the expression 'غير المغضوب عليهم ولا الضالين' is superfluous/redundant (ilgha), and he supports and refutes this view with poetic examples; he also reports that Kufan grammarians found this interpretation incorrect. He further states that Allah's wrath means punishing the servant in this world or the hereafter in response to the sins he has committed, and emphasizes that attributing misguidance to humans does not confirm the claims of the Qadariyya, because it is clearly stated in the Qur'an that Allah is both the one who guides and the one who leads astray. Finally, he transmits that 'the path of those upon whom He has bestowed favor' is the path of the prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, and the righteous.
وأما نحويو الكوفيين فأنكروا هذا التأويل واستخطئوه، وزعموا أن ذلك لو كان كما قاله الزاعم من أهل البصرة لكان خطأ أن يقال
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
In this section, Zamakhsharī states that the servant will be held responsible for his ears, eyes, and heart, and that the servant will be questioned about the reason he heard, looked at, or resolved to do something that was not permissible for him. He also explains that the word 'al-fuâd' is read in one recitation as 'al-fevâd', which results from the hamza being transformed into a wāw and then this state being continued with a fatha.
يقال للإنسان : لم سمعت ما لم يحل لك سماعه ؛ ولم نظرت إلى ما لم يحل لك النظر إليه ، ولم عزمت على ما لم يحل لك العزم عليه ؟ وقرىء ( والفواد ) بفتح الفاء والواو ، قلبت الهمزة واوا بعد الضمة في الفؤاد ، ثم استصحب القلب مع الفتح
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, in the expression 'The Straight Path is the path of those upon whom He has bestowed favor', the meaning of favor is the favor of faith; for if religious favors are something other than faith, they are dependent upon faith, while faith itself can occur independently of other religious favors. Based on this finding, it is stated that the verse shows that Allah is the creator and giver of faith, and therefore the Mu'tazilite view that the servant is the creator of his deeds is false. It is also stated that the verse indicates the infallibility of angels and prophets.
فرجع حاصل القول في قوله اهدنا الصراط المستقيم صراط الذين أنعمت عليهم أنه طلب لنعمة الإيمان
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Qurtubī, the word 'dâllîn' in the Arabic language means straying from the right path, and this word is derived from the root 'ḍ-l-l' and is related to the meaning of being lost or perishing. Furthermore, in the text, the grammatical functions of the words 'ğayr' and 'lâ' (substitution, circumstantial qualifier, exception, emphasis) have been discussed, and recitation differences have been transmitted (the recitation of 'Umar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and Ubay ibn Ka'b). It is stated that the original form of the word 'al-ḍâllîn' is 'al-ḍâlâlîn', and it was transformed into this form according to the rule of assimilation.
الضلال في كلام العرب هو الذهاب عن سنن القصد وطريق الحق ومنه : ضل اللبن في الماء أي غاب
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Ibn Kathīr transmits that those upon the 'Straight Path' are those upon whom favor was bestowed as mentioned in Sūrat al-Nisā' (the prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, the righteous); that 'al-mağdûb 'alayhim' are the Jews, and 'al-dâllîn' are the Christians, and this is supported by the reports of 'Umar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb, 'Abdullah ibn Shāqīq, and 'Adī ibn Hātim. He also discusses in detail the merit of saying āmīn, and the doctrinal differences regarding the matter of whether the congregation should say āmīn aloud when the imam says it aloud in recitation (the Ḥanafī, Shāfi'ī's old and new views, Mālikī reports, and Aḥmad ibn Hanbal).
وقال عبد الرزاق أخبرنا معمر عن بديل العقيلي أخبرني عبد الله بن شقيق أنه أخبره من سمع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وهو بوادي القرى وهو على فرسه وسأله رجل من بني القين فقال يا رسول الله من هؤلاء قال المغضوب عليهم وأشار إلى اليهود والضالون هم النصارى
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Baydāwī, the expression 'al-ladhīn an'amta 'alayhim' is a complete substitute from what precedes it and indicates in the most emphatic manner that the Straight Path is the path of the believers. 'Ğayr al-mağdûb 'alayhim wa-lā al-dâllîn' expresses that those upon whom favor was bestowed are those free from wrath and misguidance; this can be explained either as a substitute or as an attribute operating like a definite pronoun with an indefinite antecedent. It is transmitted that those against whom wrath was incurred are the Jews and the misguided are the Christians; furthermore, with another interpretation, those against whom wrath was incurred could be the disobedient and the misguided could be the ignorant who do not know Allah.
وفائدته التوكيد والتنصيص على أن طريق المسلمين هو المشهود عليه بالاستقامة على آكد وجه وأبلغه لأنه جعل كالتفسير والبيان له فكأنه من البين الذي لا خفاء فيه أن الطريق المستقيم ما يكون طريق المؤمنين.
Comparison
Common ground
All the exegetes concerned themselves with the grammatical/syntactical structure of the words in the final portion of the verse (especially 'dâllîn', 'lâ', 'ğayr'), and made linguistic/rhetorical analysis one of the fundamental foundations of their exegeses. Ibn Kathīr and Baydāwī explicitly agree that 'al-mağdûb 'alayhim' refers to the Jews and 'al-dâllîn' refers to the Christians; both Taberî and Ibn Kathīr agree that those upon whom favor was bestowed are the prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, and the righteous (Ibn Kathīr bases this on Sūrat al-Nisā'). Paying attention to recitation differences (Zamakhsharī, Qurtubī, Baydāwī, Ibn Kathīr) and engaging in grammatical discussions with poetic/linguistic testimonies (Taberî, Qurtubī, Baydāwī) is a common methodological approach.
Differences
Taberî's fundamental issue is the discussion of whether the letter 'lâ' is redundant, and he places this in a theological framework through criticism of Qadariyya (emphasizing that Allah is both the creator of guidance and misguidance); this brings him close to early Sunni-Qadariyya polemics. Zamakhsharī focused on a different passage in this verse (responsibility for eyes, ears, and heart, and recitation difference) and, despite his Mu'tazilite identity, did not conduct a direct theological discussion here. Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, on the other hand, uses the verse directly as evidence against the Mu'tazilites; by arguing that faith is created by Allah and the servant is not the creator of his deeds, he places the Ash'arī-Mu'tazilite dispute at the center—this is a theological intensity that is not as pronounced in the others. Qurtubī concentrates more on linguistic and recitation reports ('Umar, Ubay ibn Ka'b) while refraining from theological discussions. Ibn Kathīr focuses primarily on transmitted/hadīth material and juristic disagreements (saying āmīn aloud, doctrinal views), which brings him closer to a hadīth-jurisprudence-oriented reading. Baydāwī presents a concise linguistic analysis, transmitting both classical (Jewish-Christian) and alternative (disobedient-ignorant) interpretations but without stating a preference; this multi-faceted yet brief manner of treatment stems from Baydāwī's nature as a summary exegesis.
Historical context
In the earliest exegete Taberî (3rd-4th century), transmitted exegesis and linguistic discussion are intertwined, and the theological disputes of his time (criticism of Qadariyya) are directly reflected in the text. With Zamakhsharī (6th century) and al-Rāzī (6th-7th century), it is seen that rational exegesis and theological-philosophical depth increase; especially in al-Rāzī, the transformation of the verse into a direct doctrinal argumentation network shows a stage where exegesis became fully integrated with theological jurisprudence. Qurtubī (7th century) brings together linguistic and recitation reports in a compilatory manner, while Ibn Kathīr (8th century) represents a return to transmitted material and classical Sunni lines, and allocates more space to juristic discussions (the matter of saying āmīn between schools)—this reflects a period when exegesis became intertwined with jurisprudence. The late-period exegete Baydāwī (late 7th century) presents a summary that synthesizes previous scholarship, multi-voiced yet brief; he does not directly engage theological disputes but rather transmits linguistic-interpretive diversity. In general, while the linguistic and transmitted material foundation remained constant, theological depth and juristic detail increased over time, after which Baydāwī returned to a summary/synthesis form.
Modern connection
The historical variety of interpretations surrounding this verse reminds us that the search for the right path proceeds together with both knowledge and sincere spiritual effort; in our time too, the balanced relationship established between learning and faith can direct a person toward preserving his course rather than adopting pretentious knowledge. Despite the different emphases of the exegetes, their shared propriety in addressing the matter offers a modest example of adopting a tolerant and constructive manner toward different viewpoints in daily life. Such multi-layered readings can suggest that patient listening and understanding within family and society may provide more lasting benefit than producing definitive judgments.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar