وَلَقَدْ جَآءَكُم مُّوسَىٰ بِٱلْبَيِّنَٰتِ ثُمَّ ٱتَّخَذْتُمُ ٱلْعِجْلَ مِنۢ بَعْدِهِۦ وَأَنتُمْ ظَٰلِمُونَ
“And Moses came unto you with clear proofs (of Allah's Sovereignty), yet, while he was away, ye chose the calf (for worship) and ye were wrong-doers.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the term 'beyyinat' mentioned in this verse refers to miracles that demonstrate the truthfulness of Moses (and other prophets) and the reality of his prophethood; the transformation of the staff into a snake, the whitening of the hand, the parting of the sea, and the verses of locusts, frogs, and lice fall within this scope. The fact that these verses are called 'beyyinat' stems from their characteristic of clearly demonstrating that they occur not through human power but solely through Allah's intervention. Additionally, the text includes a linguistic discussion regarding the use of the particle 'illa' in the sense of 'gayr' (other than).
وإنما سماها الله بينات لتبينها للناظرين إليها أنها معجزة لا يقدر على أن يأتي بها بشر إلا بتسخير الله ذلك له
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî explains the grammatical connection of the phrase 'bi'l-beyyinât' in the sentence through various linguistic possibilities; he shows that this phrase could be connected to the verb 'erselnâ', as an adjective to the word 'ricâlen', to a hidden verb 'ürsilû', to the verb 'yûhâ', or to the phrase 'lâ ta'lemûn'. Furthermore, he mentions that the prophets were sent with the proofs given to them, their scriptures, and wisdom (the Gospel and their laws) to clarify religious matters about which people differed. According to him, the prophets did not explain everything that was disputed, but only the part that pertained to religion and divine obligation.
فأما أن يتعلق بما أرسلنا داخلا تحت حكم الاستثناء مع رجالا أي : وما أرسلنا إلا رجالا بالبينات ، كقولك : ما ضربت إلا زيدا بالسوط ؛ لأن أصله : ضربت زيدا بالسوط وإما برجالا ، صفة له : أي رجالا ملتبسين بالبينات
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the repetition of the verse comes after describing the refusal and resistance of the Jews during the time of Prophet Muhammad, in order to remind them of their ancestors' similar stubbornness toward Moses. Although Moses came with clear miracles, they took the calf as a god, while in response Moses remained patiently attached to his religion and mission; this situation has been likened in the same way to the relationship of Prophet Muhammad with his people. Furthermore, the use of the verb 'câe' carries a different meaning from the situation of other prophets, stemming from the fact that Moses was actually distant from his people and then came to them.
والسبب في تكريرها أنه تعالى لما حكى طريقة اليهود في زمان محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم ووصفهم بالعناد والتكذيب ومثلهم بسلفهم في قتلهم الأنبياء الذي يناسب التكذيب لهم بل يزيد عليه ، أعاد ذكر موسى عليه السلام وما جاء به من البينات
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Kurtubî mentions that the term 'beyyinat' in the verse refers to the nine miracles given to Prophet Moses (the staff, flood, locusts, frogs, blood, the parting of the sea, and so forth). He also transmits another view that the beyyinat could be the Torah and the proofs contained within it.
والبينات قوله تعالى : ولقد آتينا موسى تسع آيات بينات وهي العصا والسنون واليد والدم والطوفان والجراد والقمل والضفادع وفلق البحر وقيل : البينات التوراة وما فيها من الدلالات
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, the 'beyyinat' in this verse are clear proofs that establish Moses' prophethood and Allah's oneness; these are the flood, locusts, lice, frogs, blood, the staff, the hand, the parting of the sea, the shading with clouds, manna and quail, and the stone—miracles that the Children of Israel witnessed directly. In contrast, while Moses withdrew to Mount Tur to supplicate to Allah, they took the calf as a god besides Allah.
والآيات البينات هي الطوفان والجراد والقمل والضفادع والدم والعصا واليد وفرق البحر وتظليلهم بالغمام والمن والسلوى والحجر وغير ذلك من الآيات التي شاهدوها ثم اتخذتم العجل أي معبودا من دون الله في زمان موسى وأيامه
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the verse points to the nine clear miracles given to Moses (the nine verses in Surah Al-A'raf), and indicates that the taking of the calf as a god occurred after Moses' arrival or after his departure to Mount Tur. The phrase 'and you are wrongdoers' could be a circumstantial clause stating that they became wrongdoers by worshipping the calf or by violating Allah's verses, or it could be an objection clause indicating that wrongdoing is their customary nature. The true purpose of the verse is not to repeat the story, but to refute the Jews' claim 'we believe in what was revealed to us' and to draw attention to the fact that their attitude toward the Prophet is the same as their ancestors' attitude toward Moses.
ومساق الآية أيضا لإبطال قولهم نؤمن بما أنزل علينا والتنبيه على أن طريقتهم مع الرسول طريقة أسلافهم مع موسى عليهما الصلاة والسلام، لا لتكرير القصة وكذا ما بعدها.
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, and Ibn Kesîr explain 'beyyinat' as the miracles given to Moses (the staff, hand, sea, locusts, frogs, blood, etc.); it is emphasized that these occur not through human power but solely through Allah's intervention. Râzî and Beydâvî converge on the point that the true purpose of the verse is not to repeat the story, but to remind the Jews of their ancestors' stubborn attitude toward Moses, thereby exposing the similar attitude of the contemporary audience.
Differences
Taberî and Zemahşerî focus primarily on linguistic and syntactic analysis (the particle 'illa', the possible grammatical connections of the phrase 'bi'l-beyyinât'); Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr take a narration-based approach to detail the number and nature of the miracles. Râzî and Beydâvî approach the text through contextual and purposive reading, discussing why the story is repeated and whether the phrase 'and you are wrongdoers' is a circumstantial clause or an objection clause. These differences stem from methodological distinctions between the linguistic school to which the exegetes belong (Zemahşerî's i'râb-focused approach) and methods of exegesis more centered on narration and context.
Historical context
Early-period exegetes (Taberî) contented themselves with fundamental explanations based on linguistic analysis and narration, while later exegetes (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Beydâvî) added more detailed syntactic possibilities and interpretive depth regarding the verse's purpose. Ibn Kesîr and Kurtubî, while maintaining the richness of narrations, synthesize earlier developments; the fundamental meaning (the miracles and the exposure of the refusal attitude) remained constant throughout all periods.
Modern connection
This comparative reading reminds us that stubbornness and resistance in the face of clear proofs and truth is a repeatedly occurring human attitude; this can be understood in our time as a call to establish a healthy harmony between science and faith, to avoid prejudice, and to demonstrate patience and sincerity in accepting truth. Furthermore, the emphasis that miracles are realized 'not through human power but through Allah's intervention' presents a perspective that encourages humility and reverence in the face of science and nature.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar