وَلَمَّا جَآءَهُمْ كِتَٰبٌ مِّنْ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ مُصَدِّقٌ لِّمَا مَعَهُمْ وَكَانُوا۟ مِن قَبْلُ يَسْتَفْتِحُونَ عَلَى ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُم مَّا عَرَفُوا۟ كَفَرُوا۟ بِهِۦ فَلَعْنَةُ ٱللَّهِ عَلَى ٱلْكَٰفِرِينَ
“And when there cometh unto them a scripture from Allah, confirming that in their possession - though before that they were asking for a signal triumph over those who disbelieved - and when there cometh unto them that which they know (to be the truth) they disbelieve therein. The curse of Allah is on disbelievers.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the book mentioned in this verse is the Qur'an revealed to Prophet Muhammad, and it came as a confirmation of the Torah and Gospel that were with them. Before the Prophet was sent, the Jews used to seek victory (istiftah) against the Arab polytheists with it, meaning they asked Allah to send them this prophet. However, when the prophet was sent from among the Arabs (as someone not from their own lineage), although they recognized him and knew what was written about him in the Torah, they did not believe in him and rejected him due to the jealousy they felt toward the Arabs.
كانت اليهود تستفتح بمحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم على كفار العرب من قبل، وقالوا: اللهم ابعث هذا النبي الذي نجده في التوراة يعذبهم ويقتلهم. فلما بعث الله محمدا صلى الله عليه وسلم فرأوا أنه بعث من غيرهم كفروا به حسدا للعرب، وهم يعلمون أنه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يجدونه مكتوبا عندهم في التوراة
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, the disbelievers, despite their superiority in eloquence, became helpless before the Qur'an and denied it immediately upon hearing it without any thought or hesitation; they did not follow the path that intelligent and prudent people follow when they hear a report—to think it over, consider it carefully, and investigate its truthfulness. Additionally, the exegete notes that the expression 'alaysa' (is it not) does not carry the meaning of interrogation but rather of confirmation (tahrir), and that the hamza of denial enters into negation, turning it to this meaning. He mentions two aspects (wajh) regarding this: either it is a repetition that the disbelievers will remain in Hell, or it is that Hell was already known to the disbelievers as a stopping place, and yet they still dared to commit this transgression.
وحقيقته : أن الهمزة همزة الإنكار دخلت على النفي ، فرجع إلى معنى التقرير ، فهما وجهان ، أحدهما : ألا يثوون في جهنم ، وألا يستوجبون الثواء فيها
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
This text fragment contains different views on multiple verses and topics together; in the story of Moses and Shuayb, it is stated that Moses' reluctance to eat stems from fear that it would be counted as a wage for his work. Furthermore, five different interpretations are transmitted regarding the expressions 'awwal kafirin bihi' and 'lamma jaahum' in Surat al-Baqarah, and it is said that the preferred one is the first of these. The condemnation of the Jews for rejecting the Prophet despite recognizing him is also separately discussed.
وإنما كره أكل الطعام خشية أن يكون ذلك أجرة له على عمله ، ولم يكره ذلك مع الخضر
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the 'book' in the verse refers to the Torah and Gospel, the book that was previously with them and was characterized by it; with this book they used to seek from Allah 'yestafzihun' (ask for help/victory) against those who did not believe. According to a narration transmitted from Ibn Abbas, when the Jews of Khaybar were defeated in their war against Ghatafan, they gained victory with a supplication in which they asked Allah for help regarding the right to the unlettered prophet who would be sent in the future; however, when the Prophet (peace be upon him) was sent, they denied this promise and this verse was revealed concerning them.
قال بن عباس : كانت يهود خيبر تقاتل غطفان فلما التقوا هزمت يهود فعادت يهود بهذا الدعاء وقالوا : إنا نسأ يعني اليهود ( كتاب ) يعني القرآن أي بك يا محمد
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this verse describes how the Jews previously sought and waited for victory against the polytheist Arabs through a prophet who was announced in the Torah they possessed and whom they knew would come in the end times. However, when this prophet (Prophet Muhammad) was sent from among the Arabs, they did not believe in him and rejected him with jealousy because he was not from among them. This view is based on an incident that occurred between the Ansar and their Jewish neighbors, and on narrations transmitted from sources such as Ibn Abbas and Abu al-Aliyah.
أن يهود كانوا يستفتحون على الأوس والخزرج برسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم قبل مبعثه فلما بعثه الله من العرب كفروا به وجحدوا ماكانوا يقولون فيه
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the Jews were waiting for the end-times prophet announced in their books, and indeed they were even asking for help against the polytheists in his name and awaiting him; however, when this reality came to them, they rejected him due to their envy and their fear regarding their position of leadership. The expression 'kuffar' (disbelievers) at the end of the verse appears as a definite noun, because it was intended to show that the reason for the curse is disbelief itself; this also makes the Jews primarily included in this general ruling.
فلما جاءهم ما عرفوا من الحق. كفروا به حسدا وخوفا على الرياسة. فلعنة الله على الكافرين أي عليهم، وأتى بالمظهر للدلالة على أنهم لعنوا لكفرهم
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî commonly transmit that the verse concerns the Jews who previously awaited a prophet announced in the Torah they possessed and sought victory against the Arabs through him, but they rejected him due to jealousy and concern for leadership because this prophet did not come from their own lineage. These four exegetes all base themselves on narrations deriving from Ibn Abbas and similar sources from the early scholars, and on a narrative of the occasion of revelation.
Differences
While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr restricted themselves to transmitting narrations and arranging earlier scholarly views, Kurtubî additionally added linguistic analysis (nasb-jarr, the analysis of the word 'yestafzihun'). Beydâvî approached the subject entirely within a language/rhetoric framework and concentrated on grammatical subtleties (the distinction between definite and indefinite, the meaning of magnification in the letter seen). Zemahşerî, on the other hand, focused on a different part of the verse and addressed how the disbelievers denied the Qur'an without reflection and the confirmation (tahrir) meaning of the expression 'alaysa'; al-Razî also transmitted multiple topics together (the story of Moses and Shuayb, different interpretations of wujuh), presenting scattered content. This difference stems partly from the variety of verse sections addressed and partly from each exegete's methodology (hadith-based tafsir versus rational-linguistic tafsir).
Historical context
While the earliest exegete Taberî followed a line based on narration transmission, in later periods Zemahşerî and Beydâvî's emphasis on language/rhetoric strengthened, while Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr maintained the foundation of narration but also incorporated linguistic elements. The basic narrative (the Jews awaiting and then rejecting) remained fixed over time, but the interpretive method diversified from narration-heavy toward linguistic and logical analysis.
Modern connection
This comparative reading can be understood as a universal warning that one may know and await a truth beforehand, yet reject it when that truth arrives due to personal interests or concerns about affiliation. In our time, this can be addressed as a lesson reminding us of the importance of approaching knowledge and truth without prejudice, sincerely and honestly. In terms of social solidarity and tolerance, it also carries a cautious association with the value of being open to truths coming from different origins.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar