وَإِذْ أَخَذْنَا مِيثَٰقَكُمْ لَا تَسْفِكُونَ دِمَآءَكُمْ وَلَا تُخْرِجُونَ أَنفُسَكُم مِّن دِيَٰرِكُمْ ثُمَّ أَقْرَرْتُمْ وَأَنتُمْ تَشْهَدُونَ
“And when We made with you a covenant (saying): Shed not the blood of your people nor turn (a party of) your people out of your dwellings. Then ye ratified (Our covenant) and ye were witnesses (thereto).” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the command 'do not kill one another' is not a direct prohibition of the Jews killing each other, but rather means that because of their religious unity, when one person kills another, it is considered as if he has killed himself. He also conveys that this expression can mean that the person who causes death through retaliation is evaluated as if he has actually killed himself. Regarding who the address is directed to, he prefers the view that this is not merely an address to the Jews living in the time of the Prophet, but a general address that encompasses all ancestors from the time of Moses onwards who remained bound by the covenant and affirmed the Torah.
ولكنهم نهوا عن أن يقتل بعضهم بعضا، فكان في قتل الرجل منهم الرجل قتل نفسه، إذ كانت ملتهما بمنزلة رجل واحد، كما قال عليه الصلاة والسلام: «إنما المؤمنون في تراحمهم وتعاطفهم بينهم بمنزلة الجسد الواحد إذا اشتكى بعضه تداعى له سائر الجسد بالحمى والسهر»
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Râzî, this verse narrates another blessing given to the Children of Israel: Allah held them responsible for certain obligations, they accepted the correctness of this covenant, but then they violated it. The text especially discusses the logical problem in the command 'do not kill yourselves' (since a person naturally refrains from killing himself by his very nature, what purpose does the prohibition serve) and offers various answers to this; furthermore, multiple interpretative possibilities regarding the expressions 'acknowledgment' and 'testimony' are listed.
والجواب عنه من أوجه ، أحدها : أن هذا الإلجاء قد يتغير كما ثبت في أهل الهند أنهم يقدرون في قتل النفس التخلص من عالم الفساد واللحوق بعالم النور والصلاح
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the address in the verse is directed to the Children of Israel; the expressions 'do not shed your blood' and 'do not expel one another from your homes' mean that because they are considered one nation and one community, what they do to one another is considered as if it were done to themselves. Furthermore, he notes that some exegetes interpreted this in the context of retaliation, but that this interpretation is forced (ba'îd), and that the correct meaning is that Allah took a covenant with the Children of Israel in the Torah regarding not killing, not expelling, and not enslaving one another. According to Ibn Huveyz Mendad's view, the literal meaning of the verse is also possible: that a person should not kill himself or abandon his house recklessly, indeed the Prophet's intervention against Osman b. Maz'un and his companions' decision to withdraw from the world is mentioned in this context.
لما كانت ملتهم واحدة وأمرهم واحد وكانوا في الأمم كالشخص الواحد جعل قتل بعضهم بعضا وإخراج بعضهم بعضا قتلا لأنفسهم ونفيا لها
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this expression indicates that they themselves accepted and acknowledged the knowledge and correctness of this covenant taken from them, and moreover, they knowingly testified to it.
أي ثم أقررتم بمعرفة هذا الميثاق وصحته وأنتم تشهدون به
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the expression in the verse 'do not shed your blood and do not expel one another from your homes' expresses that killing another person is considered as if one has killed himself because of lineal descent, religious bond, or retaliation. Furthermore, it has been said that this expression means avoiding deeds that would make bloodshed and expulsion permissible; or metaphorically it means the real 'killing' that deprives of eternal life and the real 'expulsion' that deprives of paradise. Finally, the expression 'you acknowledged while testifying' is either interpreted as an expression for emphasis, or as the current generations bearing witness to their ancestors' acknowledgment, and thus the acknowledgment being metaphorically attributed to them.
وإنما جعل قتل الرجل غيره قتل نفسه، لاتصاله به نسبا. أو دينا، أو لأنه يوجبه قصاصا. وقيل معناه لا ترتكبوا ما يبيح سفك دمائكم وإخراجكم من دياركم
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes emphasize that the expression 'do not kill one another/do not shed your blood' is not a direct prohibition of actual murder in the literal sense, but rather that when one person kills another because of religious or lineal bonds, it is considered as if he has killed himself. Furthermore, there is a common tendency among them (Taberî, Kurtubî, Beydâvî) regarding the expression containing a metaphorical/linguistic attribution, and it is accepted that the address is in the context of a covenant/pact given to the Children of Israel.
Differences
While Taberî and Beydâvî include the possibility of causing death through retaliation in their interpretation, Kurtubî rejects this retaliation interpretation as 'forced' and links the correct meaning to the covenant in the Torah; he also reports Ibn Huveyz Mendad's literal interpretation (not harming oneself). Râzî, on the other hand, discusses a logical problem with the verse (the futility of the prohibition) and lists various answers, thus exhibiting a more speculative/theological approach. Ibn Kesîr keeps the matter simpler and focuses solely on the aspect of acknowledgment and testimony. Regarding the scope of the address, Taberî extends it to all ancestors from the time of Moses onwards, while the others do not enter into this discussion.
Historical context
Taberî, an early exegete, transmits the views of predecessors using a narration-heavy method and tends to expand the scope of the address; Râzî adds a different layer through theological/logical inquiry; Kurtubî harmonizes jurisprudential and historical reports (such as the story of Osman b. Maz'un) while criticizing forced interpretations; Ibn Kesîr exhibits a more summary and transmission-focused attitude; Beydâvî presents multiple interpretative possibilities in an organized manner with the style of the later period. While the basic line (metaphorical attribution and covenant emphasis) remains constant, the method and depth have diversified according to periods.
Modern connection
This verse can remind us that the bond between members of a community should be viewed in such a way that harming one another—even indirectly—is like harming the community's own integrity. Through the themes of social solidarity and covenant loyalty, one can consider that a person's responsibility toward the community to which he belongs must be supported by individual conscience as well. This reading can, with caution, be evaluated as a reminder that nourishes awareness of social peace and mutual respect in today's world.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar