فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُونَ هَٰذَا مِنْ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا۟ بِهِۦ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًا فَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا كَتَبَتْ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا يَكْسِبُونَ
“Therefore woe be unto those who write the Scripture with their hands and then say, "This is from Allah," that they may purchase a small gain therewith. Woe unto them for that their hands have written, and woe unto them for that they earn thereby.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the word 'ummî' means a person who does not know writing among the Arabs; this qualification is made in relation to the mother, not the father, because writing was a man's work and a man who did not know writing would be attributed to his mother out of ignorance. Furthermore, different reports are transmitted regarding the interpretation of the word 'wayl': some explain it as punishment, while others describe it as pus/blood flowing in the depths of Hell or a valley. The text also transmits that some people from the Children of Israel sold a book they wrote with their own hands, claiming it came from Allah, for a small price, and that they altered the description of Prophet Muhammad in the Torah.
وذلك أن الأمي عند العرب هو الذي لا يكتب. قال أبو جعفر: وأرى أنه قيل للأمي أمي نسبة له بأنه لا يكتب إلى أمه ، لأن الكتاب كان في الرجال دون النساء، فنسب من لا يكتب ولا يخط من الرجال إلى أمه في جهله بالكتابة دون أبيه
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
This text discusses the grammatical relationship between the verb 'yugashshîkum' and the word 'emeneten' mentioned in the verse; according to Zemahşerî, because sleep (nu'âs) and security/peace (emn) belong to the same people, the word 'emeneten' takes the accusative case as the object of the verb 'te'nûsûne'. Furthermore, it notes that 'emeneten' can also mean 'îmân', or through metaphorical attribution, that fear prevents sleep, and their sleeping occurs as a result of Allah granting peace to their hearts.
ولكن لما كان معنى يغشاكم النعاس . تنعسون ، انتصب أمنة على أن النعاس والأمنة لهم . والمعنى : إذ تنعسون أمنة بمعنى أمنا ، أي لأمنكم ، و { منه } صفة لها : أي أمنة حاصلة لكم من الله عز وجل
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the phrase 'biaydîhim' either emphasizes that the act of writing is accomplished with their own hands or carries an intention of emphasis against the deniers. Then, selling the book for a small price shows the ultimate point of their wickedness and reveals that they did this tahrif not in the name of religion but to obtain wealth and position; this also indicates that acquiring wealth through unlawful means is forbidden even if done willingly. The repeated mention of 'wayl' in connection with gain (kesb) is to show that both the writing and receiving money in exchange for this writing are separate grave sins, and therefore the threat is directed not only at the combination of the two but at each one separately.
الثاني : أنه يدل على أنهم ما فعلوا ذلك التحريف ديانة بل إنما فعلوه طلبا للمال والجاه / وهذا يدل على أن أخذ المال على الباطل وإن كان بالتراضي فهو محرم
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî transmits different reports regarding the reason for the revelation of this verse: according to a report from Ibn Abbas, the verse was revealed about Ali b. Abi Talib, who had four dirhams which he gave as charity night and day, secretly and openly. Ibn Juraij reports that it was revealed about a man who did this action, but the person's name is not specified as either Ali or someone else. According to Katâda, the verse was revealed generally about people who spend without extravagance or stinginess.
وروي عن بن عباس أنه قال : نزلت في علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه كانت معه أربعة دراهم فتصدق بدرهم ليلا وبدرهم نهارا وبدرهم سرا وبدرهم جهرا
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this verse targets Jewish religious scholars (ahbâr) who altered the Torah, claimed that the words they wrote with their own hands came from Allah, and sold them for a small price, eating people's wealth through falsehood. The expression 'wayl' directed at them informs of the destruction and punishment that will come both from their false writing and from the unlawful gain they obtained in this way. The exegete also transmits different meanings of the word 'wayl' in lexicography and hadith reports (a valley in Hell, a mountain, the severity of punishment, etc.), thereby expanding the semantic framework of the word.
هؤلاء صنف آخر من اليهود وهم الدعاة إلى الضلال بالزور والكذب على الله وأكل أموال الناس بالباطل والويل الهلاك والدمار وهي كلمة مشهورة في اللغة
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâwî, the 'ummîs' mentioned in this verse are people who do not know how to read and write the Scripture, and therefore cannot personally examine and verify the Torah; what they know from the Scripture is merely baseless beliefs and empty promises they take through imitation from those who altered it (such as that only Jews enter Paradise, or that the fire will only touch them for a few days). In the following verse, the expression 'wayl' is a threat and curse directed at those who altered the Scripture, wrote it with their own hands, presented it as coming from Allah, and thus sought to obtain worldly small benefit (bribe).
ومنهم أميون لا يعلمون الكتاب جهلة لا يعرفون الكتابة فيطالعوا التوراة، ويتحققوا ما فيها. أو التوراة إلا أماني استثناء منقطع. والأماني: جمع أمنية وهي في الأصل ما يقدره الإنسان في نفسه من منى إذا قدر، ولذلك تطلق، على الكذب وعلى ما يتمنى وما يقرأ والمعنى لكن يعتقدون أكاذيب أخذوها تقليدا من المحرفين أو مواعيد فارغة.
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Râzî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâwî are united in the point that the verse targets some people from the Children of Israel who wrote words with their own hands, attributed them to Allah, and sold them for a small price, which constitutes unlawful gain and tahrif; there is also shared emphasis on the meaning and severity of the word 'wayl'.
Differences
While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr address the issue with a report-oriented method (transmissions from companions and successors), Zemahşerî and Beydâwî concentrate on linguistic/grammatical and rhetorical analysis (object of the verb, word roots like ummî-emâniyy). Râzî extends to a juridical inference (that unlawful gain is forbidden even if done willingly), while Kurtubî presents an example outside the coherence of the subject by transmitting reports about the reason for revelation of a completely different verse (the example of Ali b. Abi Talib); these differences stem from the exegetes' schools (linguistic/report-based/juridical) and methodological preferences.
Historical context
In the process extending from Taberî to Beydâwî, the report material was preserved as a stable reference source, but over time linguistic and rhetorical analysis (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Beydâwî) became more systematic and grammatically based; this reflects an expanding process of accumulation in the exegetical tradition moving from reports to linguistico-logical analysis, though the basic semantic framework was largely preserved.
Modern connection
This comparative reading can remind us how seriously distorting information or transmitting it through imitation, especially when carrying a material interest, creates responsibility. Here it can be thought that knowledge and honesty must proceed together, that is, both the effort to reach correct knowledge and sincerity in transmitting it are important. In this context, it can cautiously be emphasized that education and correct transmission of information are elements that protect societal trust.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar