“Are they then unaware that Allah knoweth that which they keep hidden and that which they proclaim?” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Taberî states that the verse expresses that Allah knows what His servants conceal and what they reveal. He describes how some of the Jews, when they encountered the believers, said 'we have believed' while concealing disbelief and denial in their hearts, and despite knowing this, they revealed it. He also touches upon the matter of those who bend/bow their chests thinking they can hide from Allah, and notes that the reading of most of the reciters is considered correct.
يقول جل ثناؤه: يعلم ما يسر هؤلاء الجهلة بربهم، الظانون أن الله يخفى عليه ما أضمرته صدورهم إذا حنوها على ما فيها وثنوه، وما تناجوه بينهم فأخفوه سواء عنده سرائر عباده وعلانيتهم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the verse expresses that Allah knows equally the hidden and open state of the disbelievers, therefore their efforts to hide are meaningless. According to some reports, the verse was revealed concerning Ahnes b. Sherîk, who showed proximity to the Messenger with pleasant words but thought differently inwardly, and according to others, concerning the hypocrites. Zemahşerî also discusses the different readings of the verb 'تثنوني' and its grammatical roots, explaining that this expression can mean the closing/weakness of hearts.
يعني أنه لا تفاوت في علمه بين إسرارهم وإعلانهم ، فلا وجه لتوصلهم إلى ما يريدون من الاستخفاء ، والله مطلع على ثنيهم صدورهم واستغشائهم ثيابهم ، ونفاقهم غير نافق عنده . روي أنها نزلت في الأخنس بن شريق وكان يظهر لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم المحبة وله منطق حلو وحسن سياق للحديث
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the word 'dâbbe' in the verse, according to its linguistic origin, encompasses all living creatures found on earth, in the sea and on mountains; only Allah knows their number, nature, organs, food and dwelling places. Furthermore, the verse shows that sustenance is guaranteed by Allah; however, the 'obligation' here should be understood not as necessity imposed on Allah, but as befits His promise, grace and bounty. Râzî also presents this verse as evidence that unlawful sustenance can also be counted as sustenance.
قال الزجاج : الدابة اسم لكل حيوان ، لأن الدابة اسم مأخوذ من الدبيب ، وبنيت هذه اللفظة على هاء التأنيث ، وأطلق على كل حيوان ذي روح ذكرا كان أو أنثى
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî draws attention to the reading differences of the verb in this verse: Ibn Muhaysın and Humeyd read 'ما تُكِنُّ', which comes from the root 'كننت الشيء' meaning to cover, to conceal something. In the similar usage in the chapter of Qasas, the interpretation is 'what the chests conceal', as if the hidden thing in the chests is thought of like a flowing substance. According to the prevalent reading, however, it is said 'أكننت الشيء', which means to keep something hidden in oneself.
ما تكن من كننت الشيء إذا سترته هنا وفيالقصص تقديره : ما تكن صدورهم عليه وكأن الضمير الذي في الصدور كالجسم السائر ومن قرأ : تكن فهو المعروف يقال : أكننت الشيء إذا أخفيته في نفسك
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr narrates that this verse describes the hypocrite Jews: when they encounter the Prophet's companions, they say 'we have believed'; when they gather among themselves, what they hide is the truths concerning Muhammad found in their books and which they deny; they refrain from explaining this to their companions, because they fear that the companions will use this against them before Allah.
كانوا إذا تولوا عن أصحاب محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم وخلا بعضهم إلى بعض تناهوا أن يخبر أحد منهم أصحاب محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم بما فتح الله عليهم مما في كتابهم خشية أن يحاجهم أصحاب محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم بما في كتابهم عند ربهم
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the verse describes the conduct of Jewish hypocrites: when they encounter the believers, they say they have believed; when they are alone among themselves, they warn each other not to convey to the believers what they know about Muhammad's attributes in the Torah; because they fear that this knowledge will be used against them by the believers. The interrogative (أتحدثونهم) according to some conveys reproach, according to others it carries the meaning of denial and prohibition. Finally, it is emphasized that Allah knows both what they conceal and what they reveal; among these hidden things are counted their concealing disbelief and displaying belief and their distorting words.
أتحدثونهم بما فتح الله عليكم بما بين لكم في التوراة من نعت محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، أو الذين نافقوا لأعقابهم إظهارا للتصلب في اليهودية، ومنعا لهم عن إبداء ما وجدوا في كتابهم، فينافقون الفريقين.
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Ibn Kesîr and Beydâvî are united in that the verse describes the conduct of hypocrites/Jews who claim belief when encountering believers but deny this among themselves. Furthermore, Taberî, Zemahşerî and Kurtubî commonly draw attention to the reading differences and discuss the meaning of concealment/covering by referring to the linguistic root of the relevant verb. All exegetes agree that Allah's knowing all hidden and revealed states equally is the fundamental message of the verse.
Differences
While Zemahşerî relates the verse to hypocrites as well as Ahnes b. Sherîk through different reports, Ibn Kesîr and Beydâvî focus more on the context of Jewish hypocrites concealing Torah knowledge. Râzî, on the other hand, proceeds in a completely different direction, dealing with the word 'dâbbe' and the matter of sustenance being undertaken by Allah, engaging in a theological and jurisprudential discussion; this shows that he addresses the verse in a different context. Kurtubî and Taberî concentrate more on linguistic reading subtleties, keeping the interpretation at a technical level. These differences stem from the exegetes' methodological preferences (report-weighted, linguistically-weighted or theologically-weighted).
Historical context
Early exegetes like Taberî adopted a cautious transmission style based on report and reading data, while later exegetes like Zemahşerî and Râzî deepened the interpretation with grammar, rhetoric and theological deductions. Later exegetes like Kurtubî and Beydâvî combined both report and linguistic analysis to present a more systematic synthesis. This process demonstrates that the fundamental message (Allah's knowing the hidden and revealed) remained constant, but the method of interpretation diversified according to the scholarly traditions of the periods.
Modern connection
This comparative reading draws attention to the importance of harmony between words and essence in terms of sincerity and piety; it reminds us that seeking consistency between what a person says and what they carry within is a moral value. Moreover, the fact that different exegetes use language, reports and reasoning together can be seen as an example of harmonious and multifaceted thinking between knowledge and faith. This also offers a general reminder that in approaching knowledge today, both heart purification and intellectual honesty must be observed together.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar