وَإِذْ نَجَّيْنَٰكُم مِّنْ ءَالِ فِرْعَوْنَ يَسُومُونَكُمْ سُوٓءَ ٱلْعَذَابِ يُذَبِّحُونَ أَبْنَآءَكُمْ وَيَسْتَحْيُونَ نِسَآءَكُمْ وَفِى ذَٰلِكُم بَلَآءٌ مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ عَظِيمٌ
“And (remember) when We did deliver you from Pharaoh's folk, who were afflicting you with dreadful torment, slaying your sons and sparing your women: that was a tremendous trial from your Lord.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the word 'belâ' (trial/affliction) mentioned in this verse means a great trial and test from the Lord; this word can sometimes mean blessing, and sometimes mean the suffering that people face in hardship and calamity. Furthermore, the expression 'yesûmûnekum' means that Pharaoh's family caused the Children of Israel to taste severe punishment and subjected them to it, and 'sû'el-azâb' is explained by their killing of the sons and sparing of the women. Taberî also emphasizes that the actions attributed to Pharaoh's family belong to those who actually carried them out, that the action is attributed to the doer regardless of the power of the one who commanded it.
أي ابتلاء واختبار لكم من ربكم عظيم، وقد يكون البلاء في هذا الموضع نعماء، وقد يكون معناه: من البلاء الذي قد يصيب الناس في الشدائد وغيرها
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî explains in this text that the expression 'يسومونكم' means 'they demanded/imposed severe punishment upon you', and that the verb 'سام' comes from the meaning of demanding something. He also notes that the sentence 'يسومونكم' is from an i'rab perspective an independent clause, and there is also the possibility of it being a circumstantial state (hal) from the addressees or from Pharaoh's family. He states that the indicator 'ذلكم' can refer to salvation or punishment, and that the word 'البلاء' can signify either blessing or trial (difficulty).
فإن قلت : ما محل يسومونكم ؟ قلت : هو استئناف لا محل له . ويجوز أن يكون حالا من المخاطبين أو من آل فرعون . و { ذالكم } إشارة إلى الإنجاء أو إلى العذاب . والبلاء : النعمة أو المحنة .
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
Râzî discusses the reason for the use of the letter vav (and) in the verse from Surat Ibrahim; by relating the view of most exegetes on whether the killing of sons refers to the elders or children, he prefers that it refers to children, not the elders. He also dwells on the meaning of the expression 'sûu'l-azâb' and the linguistic analysis of Pharaoh and the word 'âl'.
وأكثر المفسرين على أن المراد بالآية الأطفال دون البالغين
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî states in this verse that the expression 'Âl-i Firavun' (Family of Pharaoh) is not limited to those who descended from Pharaoh, but encompasses everyone who followed his religion and nation. By the same principle, he argues that the 'âl' of the Prophet refers to those who embraced his religion and nation, and that genealogical proximity alone is not sufficient. He uses this view as evidence against the Rafizites who limit the Ahl al-Bayt only to Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn.
وكذلك آل الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم من هو على دينه وملته في عصره وسائر الأعصار سواء كان نسيبا له أو لم يكن ومن لم يكن على دينه وملته فليس من آله ولا أهله وإن كان نسيبه وقريبه خلافا للرافضة حيث قالت : إن آل رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فاطمة والحسن والحسين فقط
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr conveys that the word 'belâ' in the verse means 'blessing', relating it through views transmitted from Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, Abu al-Aliyah, Abu Malik, and Suddî. He also notes that according to the majority view transmitted by Kurtubî, the reference in this verse is to evils such as the killing of children and sparing of women, and that 'belâ' here means trial/affliction. Ibn Kesîr mentions that both meanings (blessing and trial) may have been intended together.
وأصل البلاء الإختبار وقد يكون بالخير والشر
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâwî, this verse is a detailed explanation of the blessing mentioned in brief in the previous verse, and conveys that Pharaoh's family considered it permissible to inflict upon the Children of Israel the worst torture in the form of killing their sons and sparing their women, and that deliverance from this was both a great blessing and a trial. Pharaoh's tyranny occurred when he learned through his dream or through the information of the sorcerers that someone would be born who would destroy his kingdom; however, their effort could not avert anything from Allah's decree. The word 'bela' in the verse can refer to both trial and blessing, because Allah's test sometimes comes through hardship and sometimes through blessing.
فلم يرد اجتهادهم من قدر الله شيئا
Comparison
Common ground
Most of the exegetes (Taberî, Zemahşerî, Ibn Kesîr, Beydâwî) emphasize that the word 'belâ' is a polysemous word that can mean both 'blessing' and 'trial/affliction', and they accept that both meanings may have been intended together. Furthermore, Taberî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâwî agree that the 'sûu'l-azâb' applied by Pharaoh's family to the Children of Israel was the killing of sons and sparing of women. Taberî, Zemahşerî, and Beydâwî commonly examine the meaning of the verbs yesûmûnekum/sâm as conveying severity/imposition by relying on linguistic and rhetorical analysis (word root, i'rab, attribution).
Differences
While Taberî employs both transmission (from Suddî) and linguistic analysis together in the earliest period of exegesis, in the later period Zemahşerî (the Mu'tazilite, linguist) places transmission almost entirely in the background and replaces it with pure grammatical and i'rab discussion; this points to the Mu'tazilite school's language-centered method of exegesis. In Râzî, theological argumentation and systematic transmission of disagreements among exegetes come to the fore; this shows a stage where exegetical activity has transformed more into a 'comparison of views'. In Kurtubî, the element of theological-sectarian polemic is evident, which also reflects the impact on exegesis of Sunni argumentation against Shiism in the Andalusian context. In Ibn Kesîr, a strong return to the transmission method is seen (Salafi inclination), while in Beydâwî, linguistic analysis and historical-transmissional knowledge are brought together in a balanced manner, bringing forward a more synthesizing and concise exegetical style. Thus, while fundamental points such as the polysemy of the word 'belâ' and the nature of Pharaoh's tyranny remain constant, the emphasis and methods of the exegetes (linguistics, transmission, theology, jurisprudence/doctrine) have diversified according to their periods and schools.
Historical context
In the earliest period of exegesis, Taberî employs both transmission (from Suddî) and linguistic analysis together; in the later period, Zemahşerî (Mu'tazilite, linguist) places transmission almost entirely in the background, allowing it to be replaced by pure grammatical and i'rab discussion. This points to the Mu'tazilite school's language-centered method of exegesis. In Râzî, theological argumentation and the systematic presentation of disagreements among exegetes come to the fore, indicating a stage where exegetical activity has become more of a 'comparison of views'. In Kurtubî, the element of theological-sectarian polemic is evident, reflecting in exegesis the impact of Sunni argumentation against Shiism in the Andalusian context. In Ibn Kesîr, a strong return to the transmission method is observed (Salafi inclination), while in Beydâwî, linguistic analysis and historical-transmissional knowledge are brought together in a balanced manner, presenting a more synthesizing and summary exegetical style. Thus, while fundamental points such as the polysemy of the word 'belâ' and the nature of Pharaoh's tyranny remain fixed, the emphasis and methods of the exegetes (linguistics, transmission, theology, jurisprudence/doctrine) have diversified according to their periods and schools.
Modern connection
The fact that the word 'belâ' (trial/affliction) in this verse can mean both blessing and trial can remind us in our time of the reality that difficulties and blessings are often intertwined in life; a hardship can at the same time be a means for patience and maturation. The fact that exegetes approach the same verse through different methods (linguistics, transmission, theology) presents a modest example of how various perspectives in the field of knowledge and faith can complement one another. This narrative, as a historical example of societal tyranny and discrimination, can prepare a cautious ground for thinking about justice and solidarity consciousness in a contemporary manner.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar