يَٰبَنِىٓ إِسْرَٰٓءِيلَ ٱذْكُرُوا۟ نِعْمَتِىَ ٱلَّتِىٓ أَنْعَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَأَوْفُوا۟ بِعَهْدِىٓ أُوفِ بِعَهْدِكُمْ وَإِيَّٰىَ فَٱرْهَبُونِ

“O Children of Israel! Remember My favour wherewith I favoured you, and fulfil your (part of the) covenant, I shall fulfil My (part of the) covenant, and fear Me.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

Taberî states that the address 'O Children of Israel' is directed at the Jewish scholars (ahbâr) from the lineage of Jacob who were present in the place to which the Prophet emigrated. The blessing that Allah reminded them of includes: sending prophets to their ancestors, revealing scriptures, saving them from the tyranny of Pharaoh, giving them power on earth, gushing forth water from the rock, and sending down manna and quail meat. The 'covenant' (ahd) is the pact taken in the Torah according to which they should clarify to people the prophethood of Muhammad and believe in him and follow him; those who fulfill this covenant have been promised paradise.

وإنما خاطب الله جل ثناؤه بقوله: أحبار اليهود من بني إسرائيل الذين كانوا بين ظهراني مهاجر رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، فنسبهم جل ذكره إلى يعقوب، كما نسب ذرية آدم إلى آدم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

In this text, the word 'ghassâq' is explained as that which flows from the pus of the inhabitants of hellfire; it is described as a punishment that burns with the heat of hamîm fire and with the cold of ghassâq, and it is noted that its stench is so foul that it spreads to the entire world. Furthermore, according to a view transmitted from Hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), ghassâq is a punishment whose nature only Allah knows.

والغساق بالتخفيف والتشديد : ما يغسق من صديد أهل النار ، يقال : غسقت العين ، إذا سال دمعها . وقيل : الحميم يحرق بحره ، والغساق يحرق ببرده
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

In this text, Fahreddin er-Râzî discusses the grammatical structure of the verb 'a'ûdhu' (I seek refuge) in the context of seeking refuge, noting that as a present-tense verb it refers to present and future states, and states that the servant confesses his own incapacity and faults and pledges his word of seeking refuge with Allah, while in turn Allah fulfills His promise of protection out of His grace. He also notes that the concept of 'ahd' (covenant) can be attributed to both Allah and the obligated party, and in this context the covenant in the verse encompasses all the obligations that Allah has commanded, and he conveys different narrations and views related to this. He narrates that against the Mu'tazilite view that reward is obligatory upon Allah, the People of the Sunnah concluded from this verse that the servant has no obligatory right over Allah.

وقال أصحابنا : إنه لا يجب للعبد على الله شيء ، وفي هذه الآية ما يدل على ذلك لأنه تعالى لما قدم ذكر النعم ، ثم رتب عليه الأمر بالوفاء بالعهد دل على أن تلك النعم السالفة توجب عهد العبودية
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Kurtubî, the text explains why the address comes as 'farhebûni' rather than 'yâ qawmi,' noting that while Moses had a lineage connection with his people, in this case there is no such lineage connection. He also states that the name 'Israel' is another name for Jacob (peace be upon him), that it is a foreign (non-Arab) name, and that it has seven different reading forms. Regarding the question of what the word 'ahd' means, he conveys different views among scholars.

ومعنى إسرائيل : عبد الله قال أبن عباس : إسرا بالعبرانية هو عبد وإيل هو الله
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

Ibn Kesîr conveys the concepts of 'ahd' and 'îfâ' (fulfillment) in the verse through different views: according to Mujâhid, this covenant is the blessings given to the Children of Israel (gushing forth of springs, manna, deliverance from the tyranny of Pharaoh); according to Abul-Âliya, it is the sending of prophets and scriptures. With Ibn Kesîr's own addition, this resembles the blessings that Moses reminded them of. According to Hasan al-Basrî, the covenant is the command to follow the Islamic religion; according to Ibn Abbas, it means that Allah is pleased with them and places them in paradise. The phrase 'fear' in the continuation of the verse represents a transition from exhortation to warning through the reminder of calamities that befell earlier peoples.

وهذا انتقال من الترغيب إلى الترهيب فدعاهم إليه بالرغبة والرهبة لعلهم يرجعون إلى الحق وإتباع الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم والإتعاظ بالقرآن وزواجره وامتثال أوامره وتصديق أخباره
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, the phrase 'remember the blessing I have given you' encompasses reflecting upon the blessing and fulfilling its gratitude; the specification of the blessing to them is because of human nature being envious and jealous, so that when a person sees a blessing given to another, he tends toward ingratitude, but when he sees what is given to himself, he tends toward contentment and gratitude. Furthermore, it is conveyed that what is meant by this may be the blessings given to their ancestors such as deliverance from Pharaoh, rescue from drowning, forgiveness of worship of the calf, and also the blessing of reaching the time of Muhammad. It is noted that the two covenants in the phrase 'fulfill My covenant, and I will fulfill your covenant' can be interpreted with different directions of attribution (Allah's covenant to them and their covenant to Allah).

وتقييد النعمة بهم لأن الإنسان غيور حسود بالطبع، فإذا نظر إلى ما أنعم الله على غيره حمله الغيرة والحسد على الكفران والسخط، وإن نظر إلى ما أنعم الله به عليه حمله حب النعمة على الرضى والشكر.

Comparison

Common ground

A common core is visible around the concepts of 'blessing' and 'covenant' that Taberî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî address: the blessings given to the Children of Israel (deliverance from the tyranny of Pharaoh, sending of prophets and scriptures, parting of the sea/rescue from drowning, etc.) are recalled, and the concept of 'covenant' is emphasized as functioning bidirectionally—both as Allah's given blessing/command and as the obligation the servant must fulfill in return. While Kurtubî and Taberî focus on the name 'Israel' belonging to Jacob and its linguistic origin, Kurtubî and Beydâvî note that the covenant concept is conveyed through different views. In general, all the exegetes use narrative material abundantly (reports from Ibn Abbas, Mujâhid, Abul-Âliya, Suddi and other sources from the Successors) and support it with linguistic/grammatical analysis.

Differences

Zemahşerî and Fahreddin er-Râzî differ in subject matter because they address different verse contexts here: Zemahşerî focuses on the lexicographic and punishment description of the word 'ghassâq,' while Fahreddin er-Râzî focuses on the grammatical structure of the refuge-seeking verb and a theological discussion (the Mu'tazilite-People of the Sunnah issue of reward and obligation); this stems from Fahreddin er-Râzî, as a member of the theological school, transposing the text to a juridical-theological foundation. While Taberî follows a narrative-heavy, transmitter-based method, Kurtubî and Beydâvî devote more space to linguistic/rhetorical analysis (grammar, morphology, readings, etymology). Ibn Kesîr presents multiple narrations comparatively without choosing between them, offering a contextual reading. Kurtubî's explanation of the preference for 'farhebûni' rather than 'yâ qawmi' in terms of lineage connection is a unique point not found in the others.

Historical context

The earliest exegete, Taberî (3rd century), bases his exegesis largely on attributed narrative transmission, while using linguistic analysis as a supporting element. Zemahşerî (6th century) emphasizes linguistic and word analysis with his Mu'tazilite-rhetorical method. Fahreddin er-Râzî (6th-7th centuries), concurrent with the development of theological science, transports the text to theological discussions (Mu'tazilite-People of the Sunnah), bringing rational argumentation to the fore. Kurtubî (7th century) systematically compiles grammatical and reading data and harmonizes them with juridical sensitivity. Ibn Kesîr (8th century) returns to the Taberî line by recentering narrative exegesis, but prefers listing different views. Beydâvî (late 7th century) uses a summary and opinion-based method, briefly conveying narrations and concentrating on linguistic subtleties (attribution, etymology). This sequence shows that the exegetical tradition has expanded over time from pure narration toward linguistic-rhetorical and theological argumentation, though narrative material has never been completely abandoned in any period.

Modern connection

This bidirectional relationship between blessing and covenant reminds us today that the capacities we possess (knowledge, health, environment of security, etc.) should be met with a consciousness of responsibility. This balance between what is given and what is obligated can transform the feeling of gratitude into an attitude focused on service and patience in family and community life. The periodic contribution of different exegetes' narrative and linguistic/rational methods provides a cautious example of how the harmony between knowledge and faith has been nourished through various forms throughout history.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar