وَٱلَّذِينَ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ مِن قَبْلِكَ وَبِٱلْـَٔاخِرَةِ هُمْ يُوقِنُونَ
“And who believe in that which is revealed unto thee (Muhammad) and that which was revealed before thee, and are certain of the Hereafter.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, in this text he conveys different views regarding whom the expression 'vel-mukîmînes-salâte' mentioned in the verse refers to in relation to 'muhsinûn/mü'minûn': some say it refers to those from the People of the Book who believed, some say it refers to angels, and some say it points to all believers who believe both in the Qur'an and the previous scriptures and establish prayer. While he himself prefers the interpretation referring to angels, he presents as the reason for this the widespread acceptance of the reading 'el-mukîmîne' in Übey b. Ka'b's mushaf. Furthermore, according to a report narrated from Ibn Abbas, the characteristic of the believers at the beginning of the surah is actually directed at refuting those who claim to believe in what came before and deny Muhammad.
وإنما اخترنا هذا على غيره، لأنه قد ذكر أن ذلك في قراءة أبي بن كعب: والمقيمين، وكذلك هو في مصحفه فيما ذكروا، فلو كان ذلك خطأ من الكاتب لكان الواجب أن يكون في كل المصاحف غير مصحفنا
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the expression in the text is in the position of a descriptor, and what is meant by the word 'kitab' here is actually the surah itself; that is, not the book in general terms, but that specific surah is meant.
صفة له . والمراد بالكتاب السورة
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Râzî points out that when the word 'îman' in the verse is used transitively with the preposition bâ, it means confirmation/belief, but mere confirmation is not sufficient and must be accompanied by ma'rifet (knowledge/gnosis). Furthermore, he explains the matter of revelation being 'inzâl' as Gabriel hearing Allah's speech in heaven and bringing it down to the Prophet, arguing that this does not require Allah to be attributed with a place or direction; rather it should be interpreted as the angel's descent from the higher to the lower.
لا نزاع بين أصحابنا وبين المعتزلة في أن الإيمان إذا عدي بالباء فالمراد منه التصديق ، فإذا قلنا فلان آمن بكذا ، فالمراد أنه صدق به ولا يكون المراد أنه صام وصلى ، فالمراد بالإيمان ها هنا التصديق بالأتفاق لكن لا بد معه من المعرفة لأن الإيمان ها هنا خرج مخرج المدح والمصدق مع الشك لا يأمن أن يكن كاذبا فهو إلى الذم أقرب
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî points out in this verse that the expression 'believing in what was sent down before you' encompasses believing collectively in all the previous scriptures, contrary to what the Jews and Christians did. Furthermore, he explains that the word 'yakîn' mentioned in the verse means certain knowledge, which is the opposite of doubt/suspicion, and he clarifies the linguistic derivation and usages of this word. He also addresses with two views the issue of how it is possible to believe in all previous sharîahs despite their mutually contradictory rulings.
ويقال : لما نزلت هذه الآية : الذين يؤمنون بالغيب قالت اليهود والنصارى : نحن آمنا بالغيب فلما قال : ويقيمون الصلاة قالوا : نحن نقيم الصلاة فلما قال ومما رزقناهم ينفقون قالوا : نحن ننفق ونتصدق فلما قال : والذين يؤمنون بما أنزل إليك وما أنزل من قبلك نفروا من ذلك
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr points out that the expression 'el-mukīmînes-salâte' can be read differently in terms of i'rab (grammatical parsing), and can be accepted as an independent sentence in the nominative case from what precedes it. Furthermore, he conveys that the expression 'mukīmîn' can either refer to those who acknowledge the responsibility of establishing prayer or, according to Ibn Cerîr's preference, to angels. It is emphasized that according to Ibn Abbas, the verse was revealed concerning Abdullah b. Salâm and his companions, and what comes from the Lord is undoubtedly the truth.
فيجوز أن يكون قوله تعالى منقطعا مما قبله وأن يكون مرفوعا على الإبتداء وخبره قال ابن عباس أنزلت في عبد الله بن سلام وثعلبة بن سعيه وأسد بن سعيه وأسد بن عبيد الذين دخلوا في الإسلام وصدقوا بما أرسل الله به محمدا صلى الله عليه وسلم
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, this expression refers to those from the People of the Book who believed (such as Abdullah b. Salâm) and is attributed to those 'who believe in the unseen'; they are included in the category of the pious along with them. According to this reading, two verses constitute the details of the pious: one describes those who have renounced polytheism and disbelief and believed, and the other describes those from the People of the Book who believed. Furthermore, it is also mentioned as a possibility that the same people constitute a single group that combines belief in both what can be perceived by reason and what is known through hearing, and the repetition of the connector serves to draw attention to the difference between the two groups.
معطوفون على الذين يؤمنون بالغيب، داخلون معهم في جملة المتقين دخول أخصين تحت أعم، إذ المراد بأولئك الذين آمنوا عن شرك وإنكار، وبهؤلاء مقابلوهم فكانت الآيتان تفصيلا للمتقين، وهو قول ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî commonly use the i'rab/linguistic discussion regarding whom the relevant expression in the verse refers to (whether to those from the People of the Book who believed, to angels, or to believers in general) and use reports narrated from Ibn Abbas in this context as their fundamental evidence. Taberî and Ibn Kesîr share Ibn Cerîr's (Taberî's own) preference for interpreting the verse as referring to angels. Kurtubî and Beydâvî somewhat overlap in their interpretation regarding the previous scriptures/believers from the People of the Book. In general, all exegetes share the methodology of using linguistic/rhetorical (i'rab, syntax, word analysis) analysis and narrative material together.
Differences
While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr propose different subjects (angels or believers) based on the nominative/accusative reading of the expression 'el-mukîmînes-salâte', Zemahşerî operates on an entirely different axis, arguing that the word 'kitab' refers to the surah and highlighting a linguistic-rhetorical point; he does not use reports on this matter. Râzî, on the other hand, diverges completely from the others by focusing on the theological-doctrinal aspect of the verse (Allah cannot be attributed with a place or direction, the matter of revelation's sending down); this reflects Râzî's reading according to his Ash'arî-theological method. Kurtubî opens a different axis by discussing the jurisprudential-theological issue of the abrogation of sharîahs, differentiating himself from the others. Beydâvî, on the other hand, prefers the interpretation regarding the People of the Book and offers a structural reading through cohesion between verses (the details of the pious). These differences stem from the exegetes' school orientations: Taberî and Ibn Kesîr are report/i'rab-oriented; Zemahşerî is rhetoric-oriented (Mu'tazilî linguistic approach); Râzî is theological-philosophical; Kurtubî is a mixture of jurisprudential-report; and Beydâvî represents a summary/synthesizing exegetical tradition.
Historical context
The earliest exegete Taberî (3rd/4th century) relies heavily on reports and the views of the Companions, while beginning with Zemahşerî (6th century) who came after him, linguistic/rhetoric-focused analysis gains strength. Râzî (6th/7th century) deepens this linguistic legacy with theological-philosophical discussions, placing reason-based interpretation in the foreground. Kurtubî (7th century) combines narrative with linguistic analysis while also addressing jurisprudential matters, offering a more comprehensive method. Ibn Kesîr (8th century) remains more faithful to Taberî's report-oriented method, returning to the interpretation of the predecessors. Beydâvî (7th/8th century) adopts an approach of summarizing and synthesizing previous exegeses (especially Zemahşerî and Râzî). Thus, over time there is an evolution from a report-oriented method to a linguistics/theology-oriented method and then toward a synthesis of these two; however, the basic narrative material (the Ibn Abbas report) has remained a fixed reference point throughout all periods.
Modern connection
The different ways of reading around this verse remind us that in the scholarly tradition, approaching the same text through report, language, and reason are not mutually exclusive paths but rather ways that enrich one another. In our time too, when seeking to understand a subject, giving value simultaneously to transmitted knowledge and linguistic and logical analysis can be thought of as a balanced approach that nurtures harmony between knowledge and faith. This diversity can also be considered an example of approaching different perspectives with patience and tolerance.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar