وَإِذْ قَالَ رَبُّكَ لِلْمَلَٰٓئِكَةِ إِنِّى جَاعِلٌ فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ خَلِيفَةً قَالُوٓا۟ أَتَجْعَلُ فِيهَا مَن يُفْسِدُ فِيهَا وَيَسْفِكُ ٱلدِّمَآءَ وَنَحْنُ نُسَبِّحُ بِحَمْدِكَ وَنُقَدِّسُ لَكَ قَالَ إِنِّىٓ أَعْلَمُ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ
“And when thy Lord said unto the angels: Lo! I am about to place a viceroy in the earth, they said: Wilt thou place therein one who will do harm therein and will shed blood, while we, we hymn Thy praise and sanctify Thee? He said: Surely I know that which ye know not.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, Allah's saying 'I know what you do not know' refers to something that the angels do not know but Allah knows; this matter is either the rebellion and arrogance that Iblis concealed within himself, or the obedient prophets, the righteous, and the people of Paradise who will come from the descendants of Adam. After transmitting various reports, Taberî finds Ibn Abbas's view worthy of preference; according to this, the hidden thing is the state of rebellion that Iblis concealed within himself.
وأولى هذه الأقوال بتأويل الآية ما قاله ابن عباس، وهو أن معنى قوله: والذي كانوا يكتمونه ما كان منطويا عليه إبليس من ال
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî explains the expression 'fasl-ı hitâb' (decisive speech) with several different possibilities: first, speech that distinguishes truth from falsehood, right from wrong—that is, the well-founded word spoken in disputes, judgments, and matters of governance; in this context, the saying attributed to Ali, 'evidence belongs to the claimant, oath belongs to the defendant,' is given as an example. As a second possibility, he transmits that some have interpreted this as the word 'ammâ ba'd' (as for what follows) that David used when beginning with the mention of Allah and then moving to the actual purpose in his speech. Third, he states that the word 'hitâb' can mean speech that is neither deficient nor excessive, concise and balanced speech, and this is exemplified by the phrase 'fasl,' which qualifies the Prophet's words as 'neither empty nor unnecessarily prolonged.'
وأردت بفصل الخطاب : الفاصل من الخطاب الذي يفصل بين الصحيح والفاسد ، والحق والباطل ، والصواب والخطأ ، وهو كلامه في القضايا والحكومات ، وتدابير الملك والمشورات . وعن علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه . وهو قوله : البينة على المدعي واليمين على المدعى عليه
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the human being is, unlike the angels who possess intellect and wisdom and animals who possess desire, a fourth type of being that carries both desire-appetite and intellect-wisdom; the purpose of creation is not ignorance and rebellion, but the emergence of knowledge, wisdom, and obedience. Furthermore, in the context of the angels' question and Allah's answer, it is discussed whether this objection of the angels can be considered a type of sin, the Mu'tazilite interpretation conforming to the doctrine of justice, and that evils are a necessity of the benefits of this lower world.
والمقصود من تخليق الإنسان ليس هو الجهل والتقليد والتكبر والتمرد فإن كل ذلك صفات البهائم والسباع بل المقصود من تخليقه ظهور العلم والحكمة والطاعة
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Kurtubî examines the meaning of the expressions 'nusbbihu' and 'nuqaddisu' in the verse from a linguistic perspective; he states that glorification means to exonerate Allah from every type of deficiency, and sanctification means to exalt and purify Him. He also transmits that when the angels spoke this statement, they did not know the pride and hypocrisy in Iblis's heart, and Allah pointed to this unknown matter with the command 'indeed, I know what you do not know.' In word analyses, the etymology of words such as 'khalîfah,' 'angel,' and 'safk' is also detailed.
وروى طلحة بن عبيد الله قال : سألت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم عن تفسير سبحان الله فقال : ( هو تنزيه الله عز وجل عن كل سوء
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, the word 'khalîfah' in the verse refers not only to Adam but also to the generations and groups that come one after another; he transmits this from Zemahşerî and Zeyd b. Ali. The angels' question is not an objection to Allah or jealousy toward the descendants of Adam, but rather an inquiry made for the purpose of learning the wisdom of this creation. Allah's answer informs that there will be superior humans such as prophets, the truthful, martyrs, and the righteous among this kind, indicating that there is a benefit unknown to the angels.
وليس المراد ههنا بالخليفة آدم عليه السلام فقط كما يقوله طائفة من المفسرين وعزاه القرطبي إلى ابن عباس وابن مسعود وجميع أهل التأويل وفي ذلك نظر بل الخلاف في ذلك كثير حكاه الرازي في تفسيره وغيره والظاهر أنه لم يرد آدم عينا إذ لو كان ذلك لما حسن قوله الملائكة
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Beydâvî states that the expression 'khalîfah' in the verse primarily refers to Adam, because he is Allah's vicegerent on earth; at the same time, he expresses that this name is also valid for every prophet who is tasked with developing the earth, governing people, and perfecting souls. Furthermore, he explains that the angels' question, 'will you create one who will cause corruption on earth?', is an inquiry aimed at learning a point at which Allah's wisdom remained hidden, not a genuine objection.
والمراد به آدم عليه الصلاة والسلام لأنه كان خليفة الله في أرضه
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes agree that the angels' question is not a genuine objection to Allah or jealousy toward the descendants of Adam; Allah's saying 'I know what you do not know' points to a wisdom or reality beyond the knowledge of the angels. Particularly in Taberî, Kurtubî, and Ibn Kesîr, a shared narrative foundation exists in which this unknown matter is either the pride and rebellion that Iblis concealed or the righteous, prophets, and superior humans who will come from the descendants of Adam. Furthermore, Beydâvî and Ibn Kesîr overlap in the point that the concept of 'khalîfah' can be inclusive not only of Adam but also of the generations and prophets from his line.
Differences
While Taberî proceeds with a purely report-based approach and prefers Ibn Abbas's view (Iblis's rebellion), Kurtubî adds a linguistic-etymological layer to this (analysis of the words glorification-sanctification, khalîfah, angel, safk). Zemahşerî focuses on another part of the verse (decisive speech) by presenting three different interpretations entirely through the method of eloquence and multiple meanings, using reports in a secondary position. Râzî, on the other hand, transfers the subject entirely to a theological-philosophical ground, addressing the position of humans among four types of beings and the question of the infallibility of angels through Mu'tazilite-Majoritarian-Hashwiyyah debate; this is the approach that diverges most methodologically from the other exegetes. Ibn Kesîr, while making transmissions from Zemahşerî and rejecting a linguistic claim by Abû Ubaydah (that the particle is redundant) with criticism, displays a critical-synthesizing attitude. Beydâvî, with a summary and essence-focused language and contextual analysis, briefly resolves the discussions detailed by the others.
Historical context
While the earliest exegete Taberî relies heavily on the transmission of reports, in subsequent periods (beginning with Zemahşerî and extending through Râzî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî), linguistic and eloquence analysis, theological discussions, and inter-sectarian arguments have become increasingly prominent. With Zemahşerî, the literary-eloquence method came to the foreground; with Râzî, theological-philosophical depth was added; Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr developed a more comprehensive approach synthesizing both reports and linguistic analysis. In Beydâvî, the previous accumulated knowledge is summarized and distilled into a more concise exposition. The fundamental conclusion (that the angels' question is inquiry rather than objection, and that the hidden matter concerns either Iblis's state or the virtue of future generations) has remained largely constant throughout the periods, but the method of reaching this conclusion has been enriched from reports to language, and from language to theological and sectarian discussions.
Modern connection
The emphasis that the angels' question is an inquiry rather than an objection, conducted with limited knowledge, can remind us in contemporary times to refrain from hasty judgment by acknowledging the limitations of our knowledge, and to adopt a tolerant approach. Furthermore, this tension in humans between the potential for error and the capacity to possess superior value can provide an intellectual foundation that encourages an unbiased, development-oriented perspective on individuals in education and social life.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar