يَمْحَقُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلرِّبَوٰا۟ وَيُرْبِى ٱلصَّدَقَٰتِ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ كَفَّارٍ أَثِيمٍ
“Allah hath blighted usury and made almsgiving fruitful. Allah loveth not the impious and guilty.” — M. M. Pickthall
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, this text is a brief linguistic explanation stating that the expression mentioned in the verse means 'increases/multiplies'. The text is very short and consists merely of replacing one word's meaning with another word.
أي يزيدها
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
Râzî examines the morphological structures of the words 'kafûr' and 'asîm' in the verse; he states that the verb 'kafûr' expresses a habit that is continuously repeated, and that the word 'asîm' carries the meaning of extreme insistence and continuity in committing sin. According to him, such a description is fitting only for someone who does not consider riba as forbidden and denies it. Furthermore, as another explanation, he states that the word 'kafûr' may refer to someone who considers riba permissible, and 'asîm' may refer to someone who, despite believing it is forbidden, still commits it, thus the verse encompasses both groups.
والأثيم فعيل بمعنى فاعل ، وهو الآثم ، وهو أيضا مبالغة في الاستمرار على اكتساب الآثام والتمادي فيه ، وذلك لا يليق إلا بمن ينكر تحريم الربا فيكون جاحدا
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî conveys that the expression 'Allah destroys riba' means that riba will lose its blessing and decrease in this world, and even if it is much, its outcome will lead to diminishment. Furthermore, as a view from Ibn Abbas, he transmits that this is valid in the Hereafter, and that sadaka (charity), pilgrimage, jihad, and maintaining family ties will not be accepted from someone who consumes riba. In contrast, he states that charities will be multiplied with blessing in this world, and their reward will be multiplied many times over in the Hereafter.
روى بن مسعود عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه قال : ( إن الربا وإن كثر فعاقبته إلى قل ( وقيل : يمحق الله الربا يعني في الآخرة وعن بن عباس في قوله تعالى : يمحق الله الربا قال : لا يقبل منه صدقة ولا حجا ولا جهادا ولا صلة
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr emphasizes that although riba appears to increase outwardly, its ultimate consequence will be diminishment, whereas in contrast, sadaka will grow and become blessed in the sight of Allah. This is supported by the hadith from Abdullah b. Masud that states 'No matter how much riba increases, its end leads to diminishment' and by hadiths from Abu Hurayra about sadaka being multiplied in Allah's hand like a foal or young camel. Furthermore, he notes that the verse ending with the description 'ungrateful-sinful' is consistent with those who practice riba not being content with the lawful earnings that Allah has permitted and consuming wealth through unjust means.
إن الربا وإن كثر فان عاقبته تصير إلى قل
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this text, Allah deprives riba of its blessing and destroys that wealth; in contrast, He multiplies charities, increases their reward, and blesses the wealth that comes from it. Beydâvî supports this view with two hadiths transmitted from the Prophet, stating that sadaka is accepted and multiplied by Allah and that zakat never diminishes wealth. Furthermore, he explains that the expression 'Allah does not love' encompasses the ungrateful disbeliever who considers every forbidden thing permissible and continues with it, and the disobedient person who persists in sin.
الله الربا يذهب ببركته ويهلك المال الذي يدخل فيه. ويربي الصدقات يضاعف ثوابها ويبارك فيما أخرجت منه، وعنه عليه الصلاة والسلام «إن الله يقبل الصدقة ويربيها كما يربي أحدكم مهره»
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, the expression 'Allah diminishes riba' means that Allah will reduce and destroy riba; in contrast, it is stated that charities will be accepted by Allah and multiplied many times for their owner. This multiplication (irbâ) is explained as the reward of the person giving sadaka being increased many times by Allah.
إن الله يقبل الصدقة إذا كانت من طيب
Comparison
Common ground
Except for Zemahşerî, the other exegetes (Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, Beydâvî, Taberî) agree on the point that although riba appears to increase outwardly, its ultimate consequence is diminishment and destruction, whereas in contrast, sadaka will be blessed by Allah and multiplied many times over. Furthermore, Râzî and Beydâvî share the interpretation that the description at the end of the verse can encompass both those who deny riba and those who believe it is forbidden yet still practice it.
Differences
Zemahşerî limits the matter to a purely linguistic explanation (the word's meaning of 'multiplication'); Râzî, on the other hand, focuses on morphological structure and grounds the continuous/insistence meaning of 'kafûr' and 'asîm' in linguistic analysis. Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr adopt a hadith-centered approach, transmitting both worldly loss of blessing and, through transmission from Ibn Abbas, the possibility of works not being accepted in the Hereafter. Taberî and Beydâvî present the contrast of diminishment and multiplication more clearly based on hadith transmissions. These differences stem from the exegetes' school-based inclinations (Zemahşerî's linguistic/rhetorical orientation, Râzî's theological-logical analysis, Kurtubî-Ibn Kesîr-Taberî's hadith-centered exegetical method).
Historical context
When viewed from the earliest exegete Taberî to the most recent (Beydâvî), it is observed that hadith material (hadiths and statements of companions) is continually used and the fundamental meaning—that riba diminishes in consequence while sadaka increases with blessing—remains constant. Over time, with Zemahşerî and Râzî, linguistic and morphological analyses became more systematic, and interpretation deepened toward justifying the ruling on riba; however, there is no fundamental rupture, rather a methodological enrichment has taken place.
Modern connection
This comparative reading points to the importance of the quality and means of acquisition of earnings over mere quantity; wealth accumulated through unjust or exploitative means may not carry true 'blessing' from social and moral perspectives, whereas actions based on sharing and support can strengthen both individual and social solidarity. In this context, it can be cautiously considered that contributions made in harmony with knowledge and faith, through mutual assistance and sincerity, can create lasting value in human relations and social life.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar