لِلْفُقَرَآءِ ٱلَّذِينَ أُحْصِرُوا۟ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ لَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ ضَرْبًا فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ يَحْسَبُهُمُ ٱلْجَاهِلُ أَغْنِيَآءَ مِنَ ٱلتَّعَفُّفِ تَعْرِفُهُم بِسِيمَٰهُمْ لَا يَسْـَٔلُونَ ٱلنَّاسَ إِلْحَافًا وَمَا تُنفِقُوا۟ مِنْ خَيْرٍ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِهِۦ عَلِيمٌ

“(Alms are) for the poor who are straitened for the cause of Allah, who cannot travel in the land (for trade). The unthinking man accounteth them wealthy because of their restraint. Thou shalt know them by their mark: They do not beg of men with importunity. And whatsoever good thing ye spend, lo! Allah knoweth it.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Taberî, the poor people mentioned in this verse are the migrant poor in Medina who cannot move about on earth to earn their living due to jihad and migration in the way of Allah, meaning those who find themselves in a restricted (muhsar) condition out of fear of the enemy. It is stated that people may think them rich due to their dignified conduct, but the Prophet can recognize them from their signs (sîmâ), such as marks of hardship, need, or the worn condition of their clothes. Taberî emphasizes that the word 'ihsâr' stems not from the enemy confining them, but from the fear of the enemy driving them into this condition.

وإنما يقال لمن حبسه العدو: حصره العدو، وإذا كان الرجل المحبس من خوف العدو قيل: أحصره خوف العدو
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Zemahşerî, the denial together in the verse of idols/worshipped beings both 'possessing' sustenance and being 'capable' of it is to reinforce that they are lifeless (mevât) entities that essentially possess no power whatsoever. The mention of these two negations together either serves merely an emphatic purpose or conveys the meaning: 'they do not possess sustenance, nor is it possible for them to possess it, this never emanates from them and is not correct.'

وإنما المعنى : لا يملكون أن يرزقوا ، والاستطعة منفية عنهم أصلا ؛ لأنهم موات ، إلا أن يقدر الراجع ويراد بالجمع بين نفي الملك والاستطاعة للتوكيد
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the lam letter in the phrase 'for the poor' (lilllfuqarâ) indicates that the charity encouraged in the previous verses is directed toward these poor; moreover, various views have been transmitted regarding the identity of these poor (that they are migrant poor, those who are restricted, those unable to participate in jihad, or those absorbed in worship). When Râzî enumerates the characteristics of these poor, he notes that their refraining from begging and making their condition known only to Allah is a greater reward than a sultan's explicit thanks to a servant who serves him well.

لما تقدمت الآيات الكثيرة في الحث على الانفاق ، قال بعدها { للفقراء } أي ذلك الإنفاق المحثوث عليه للفقراء
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Kurtubî, this verse speaks of migrants who have devoted themselves to warfare and earning their livelihood, and have consequently become poor; they refrain from begging and conduct themselves with dignity, so ignorant people think them wealthy. Furthermore, he transmits that there is disagreement among exegetes regarding the 'sîmâ' on the faces of these poor; it could be marks of humility, signs of poverty, worn clothing, or the mark of prostration, and he himself prefers the view that it is the mark of prostration.

والمعنى حبسوا ومنعوا قال قتادة وبن زيد : معنى أحصروا في سبيل الله حبسوا أنفسهم عن التصرف في معايشهم خوف العدو ولهذا قال تعالى : فيقال السيماء وقد اختلف العلماء في تعيينها هنا فقال مجاهد : هي الخشوع والتواضع
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, this verse speaks of poor people who, due to their occupation with jihad in the way of Allah, cannot move about on earth to earn their livelihood; because of their dignified conduct, one who does not know them thinks them wealthy, but they are recognized by the weakness in their faces and the sign of distress in their state. These people never insistently beg from people; even if they ask in a desperate situation, they do not persist. According to one view, these are approximately four hundred migrant poor called Ashâb-ı Suffe, who sit on the veranda of the mosque and devote their time to knowledge and worship, participating in every expedition sent by the Prophet.

وقيل هم أهل الصفة كانوا نحوا من أربعمائة من فقراء المهاجرين يسكنون صفة المسجد يستغرقون أوقاتهم بالتعلم والعبادة، وكانوا يخرجون في كل سرية بعثها رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم.

Comparison

Common ground

Taberî, Râzî, Kurtubî, and Beydâvî agree that the poor mentioned in the verse refer to migrant poor who cannot work to earn their living due to their occupation with jihad and migration in the way of Allah. It is a common emphasis that these people are thought to be wealthy by those who do not know them because of their dignified conduct, but they can be recognized by the signs in their faces and conditions (sîmâ); their refraining from begging is also a prominent characteristic in all of them.

Differences

Taberî emphasizes the linguistic analysis of the word 'ihsâr' and bases himself on transmitted reports from companions and successors, stressing that the poor are restricted due to fear of the enemy; Zemahşerî, however, apart from this verse, addresses the rhetorical function of negation expressions in a different verse (concerning idols). While Râzî focuses on the legal/contextual function of the lam letter and transmitted stories, Kurtubî transmits the disagreements concerning sîmâ, prefers the view of the mark of prostration, and connects it to the jurisprudence of alms-tax. Beydâvî concretely identifies these poor as specifically the Ashâb-ı Suffe. The differences relate to which method (linguistic analysis, transmission of reports, legal reasoning) the exegete prioritizes and to his scholarly school.

Historical context

While the earliest exegete Taberî establishes the matter with a transmission-focused approach, later exegetes (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Kurtubî, Beydâvî) rendered linguistic and rhetorical analyses more systematic, compiling disagreements and making choices among them. The fundamental reading regarding the migrant identity of the poor and their dignified conduct remained stable; only the details (what the sîmâ consists of, clarification of their identities) became enriched over time.

Modern connection

This verse can be read as a reminder of attentiveness regarding recognizing people who are in need but do not display it ostentatiously, demonstrating a dignified patience and sincerity. It can be considered that social solidarity requires awareness not only of visible needs but also of unnoticed hardship and shame. In our time, this offers general inspiration for how the culture of mutual aid and empathy should operate with such subtleties.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar