يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا تُبْطِلُوا۟ صَدَقَٰتِكُم بِٱلْمَنِّ وَٱلْأَذَىٰ كَٱلَّذِى يُنفِقُ مَالَهُۥ رِئَآءَ ٱلنَّاسِ وَلَا يُؤْمِنُ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْـَٔاخِرِ فَمَثَلُهُۥ كَمَثَلِ صَفْوَانٍ عَلَيْهِ تُرَابٌ فَأَصَابَهُۥ وَابِلٌ فَتَرَكَهُۥ صَلْدًا لَّا يَقْدِرُونَ عَلَىٰ شَىْءٍ مِّمَّا كَسَبُوا۟ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلْكَٰفِرِينَ
“O ye who believe! Render not vain your almsgiving by reproach and injury, like him who spendeth his wealth only to be seen of men and believeth not in Allah and the Last Day. His likeness is as the likeness of a rock whereon is dust of earth; a rainstorm smiteth it, leaving it smooth and bare. They have no control of aught of that which they have gained. Allah guideth not the disbelieving folk.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Taberî explains that the sadaqah (charity) of the hypocrite mentioned in the verse is likened to soil on Safvan (slippery rock); just as a heavy downpour strips away the soil and leaves the rock bare, so too does charity given for show (riya) leave the person with no reward in the hereafter. This person gives their wealth to show off to people without believing in Allah and the Day of Judgment; their intention is not Allah's pleasure but rather the praise of people. As a result, such people will gain no benefit from what they earned in this world on the Day of Resurrection, because their deeds are performed only for show and for people's appreciation.
يعني به الذين ينفقون أموالهم رئاء الناس، ولا يؤمنون بالله ولا باليوم الآخر، يقول: لا يقدرون يوم القيامة على ثواب شيء مما كسبوا في الدنيا؛ لأنهم لم يعملوا لمعادهم ولا لطلب ما عند الله في الآخرة، ولكنهم عملوه رئاء الناس وطلب حمدهم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
The given text consists only of the phrase 'the Day of Resurrection'; this passage attributed to Zemahşerî contains no explanation, justification, or commentary whatsoever.
يوم القيامة
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Râzî, the 'ibtal' (nullification of charity) mentioned in the verse does not mean that reward is first established and then destroyed through harm and insult; rather, it means that the deed is invalid from its very beginning. That is, charity performed with riya, just like charity spoiled by harm and insult, is invalid from the start since it was not performed for Allah's pleasure; there is no question of first earning reward and then having it erased. This interpretation is made to refute the Mu'tazilite view that reward is first produced and then nullified.
الوجه الثاني : أن يكون المراد بالإبطال أن يؤتي بها على وجه يوجب الثواب ، ثم بعد ذلك إذا اتبعت بالمن والأذى صار عقاب المن والأذى مزيلا لثواب تلك الصدقة ، وعلى هذا الوجه ينفعهم التمسك بالآية
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, this verse deals with the nullification of the reward of sadaqah through withholding (men) and harm (eza); this nullification applies only to the reward of that particular charity and not to the person's other good deeds. According to the majority of scholars, sadaqah which Allah knows He will withhold or harm is not accepted; according to another view, the angel does not record this charity. The condition of the show-off is also likened to a smooth rock (safvan) covered with soil, just as a heavy downpour carries away the soil and leaves the rock bare, so too do withholding, harm, and show destroy the reward when the intention becomes apparent in the hereafter.
قال جمهور العلماء في هذه الآية : إن الصدقة التي يعلم الله من صاحبها أنه يمن أو يؤذي بها فإنها لا تقبل وقيل : بل قد جعل الله للملك عليها أمارة فهو لا يكتبها وهذا حسن
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kathîr, this verse informs us that the reward of sadaqah will be nullified through stinginess and harm; the reward of sadaqah does not equal this sin of stinginess and harm. Since charity performed with riya is done solely for worldly purposes such as being praised by people, gaining fame, or being called generous without regard for Allah's pleasure, it is likened to nullifying charity through stinginess and harm. This is likened to a slippery rock (safvan) whose soil is swept away by heavy rain, leaving it completely bare and dry; the deeds of show-offs too, though they may appear to people as if they are something, vanish before Allah just like this.
فأخبر أن الصدقة تبطل بما يتبعها من المن والأذى فما يفي ثواب الصدقة بخطيئة المن والأذى ثم قال تعالى أي لا تبطلوا صدقاتكم بالمن والأذى كما تبطل صدقة من راءى بها الناس
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Beydâvî explains the condition of a person who spends in Allah's way but does it to show off to people and does not believe in Allah and the Day of Judgment through the example of a heavy rain striking a smooth rock covered with soil and leaving it completely clean. This person's charity too is completely destroyed like the rain carrying away the soil, leaving no benefit or reward from it. Additionally, he notes that there is a subtle reproof (tariz) in the verse directed at disbelievers, that show, stinginess, and harm are characteristics of disbelievers, and that believers must avoid these.
فمثله أي فمثل المرائي في إنفاقه. كمثل صفوان كمثل حجر أملس. عليه تراب فأصابه وابل مطر عظيم القطر. فتركه صلدا أملس نقيا من التراب. لا يقدرون على شيء مما كسبوا لا ينتفعون بما فعلوا رئاء ولا يجدون له ثوابا
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kathîr, and Beydâvî commonly liken the safvan (smooth rock covered with soil) in the verse to show-off charity having no reward in the hereafter and disappearing completely. The heavy rain stripping away the soil and leaving the rock bare symbolizes the show-off's deed, though apparently existing, becoming worthless before Allah. These exegetes support this simile through linguistic/rhetorical analysis and transmitted reports; the text attributed to Zemahşerî is too brief to be included in the comparison.
Differences
Râzî extends the issue into a theological discussion, emphasizing that 'nullification' means the deed is invalid from its beginning, not that reward is first created and then erased; he develops this interpretation to refute the Mu'tazilite view of reward being nullified later. Kurtubî and Ibn Kathîr, on the other hand, focus more on the juridical/moral dimension, explaining how stinginess-harm-show invalidate charity through the views and reports of the majority of scholars. Beydâvî further notes that there is a subtle reproof (tariz) in the verse directed at disbelievers, drawing a moral distinction between believers and disbelievers. Taberî's approach reflects the classical exegetical method based more on linguistic analysis and reports from Companions and Successors.
Historical context
In the process from Taberî to Beydâvî, the fundamental simile and moral message remain constant, but the exegetical method has become more varied: in the early period (Taberî), transmitted reports and linguistic analysis took priority; in later periods (Râzî), theological discussions came to the fore; in Kurtubî and Ibn Kathîr, juridical-moral derivations and hadith/report support gained weight; in Beydâvî, linguistic subtleties and rhetorical elements (tariz) are treated more systematically.
Modern connection
This verse reminds us that the value of good deeds performed lies not merely in their outward magnitude but in the sincerity of intention; this is directly related to the concept of ihlas (sincerity). Today, when engaging in social assistance and service activities, it can be considered that maintaining a sincere attitude free from the concern of receiving praise can contribute to both individual and social well-being. This reading offers a careful reminder that the spirit of worship and charity should carry an enduring value cleansed of ostentation.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar