فَلَمَّا فَصَلَ طَالُوتُ بِٱلْجُنُودِ قَالَ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ مُبْتَلِيكُم بِنَهَرٍ فَمَن شَرِبَ مِنْهُ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّى وَمَن لَّمْ يَطْعَمْهُ فَإِنَّهُۥ مِنِّىٓ إِلَّا مَنِ ٱغْتَرَفَ غُرْفَةًۢ بِيَدِهِۦ فَشَرِبُوا۟ مِنْهُ إِلَّا قَلِيلًا مِّنْهُمْ فَلَمَّا جَاوَزَهُۥ هُوَ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ مَعَهُۥ قَالُوا۟ لَا طَاقَةَ لَنَا ٱلْيَوْمَ بِجَالُوتَ وَجُنُودِهِۦ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَظُنُّونَ أَنَّهُم مُّلَٰقُوا۟ ٱللَّهِ كَم مِّن فِئَةٍ قَلِيلَةٍ غَلَبَتْ فِئَةً كَثِيرَةًۢ بِإِذْنِ ٱللَّهِ وَٱللَّهُ مَعَ ٱلصَّٰبِرِينَ

“And when Saul set out with the army, he said: Lo! Allah will try you by (the ordeal of) a river. Whosoever therefore drinketh thereof he is not of me, and whosoever tasteth it not he is of me, save him who taketh (thereof) in the hollow of his hand. But they drank thereof, all save a few of them. And after he had crossed (the river), he and those who believed with him, they said: We have no power this day against Goliath and his hosts. But those who knew that they would meet Allah exclaimed: How many a little company hath overcome a mighty host by Allah's leave! Allah is with the steadfast.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

Taberî in this section addresses the departure of Talut's army from Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem), the condition of the limited number of believers who crossed the river, and makes a comparison with the number of companions at the Battle of Badr. He also explains that those who are patient will receive Allah's help, that a small group can overcome a large group by Allah's permission, and narrates the story of Talut, Goliath, and David.

وأما قوله: {فصل} فإنه يعني به شخص بالجند ورحل بهم. وأصل الفصل: القطع، يقال منه: فصل الرجل من موضع كذا وكذا، يعني به قطع ذلك، فجاوزه شاخصا إلى غيره، يفصل فصولا
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the text addresses several verse fragments in a scattered manner; in particular, regarding the expression 'fasl' (weaning) in Quran 2:233, which according to the majority of exegetes means 'fitam' (complete weaning), since Allah specifies the complete period of breastfeeding as two full years, it is necessary that this verse not be repetitive and should be interpreted as referring to a different situation (the permissibility of weaning before two years). However, various topics such as the departure of Talut and his army, the narrative concerning Satan, and the trial of not drinking water are also addressed consecutively.

واعلم أنه تعالى لما بين أن الحولين الكاملين هو تمام مدة الرضاع وجب حمل هذه الآية على غير ذلك حتى لا يلزم التكرار
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

Ibn Kathir narrates the views of Ibn Abbas, Qatadah, Ibn Shawzab, and al-Suddi regarding the verse of trial by the river: whoever took water in his palm and drank it was satiated, while whoever drank directly from the river was not satiated. Furthermore, through a narration from Bara' ibn Azib, it is mentioned that the number of the Prophet Muhammad's companions on the day of Badr was equal to the number of believers who crossed the river with Talut (three hundred and some). It is also stated that the river is the famous Sharia River between Jordan and Palestine (the Jordan River).

قال ابن جريج قال ابن عباس من اغترف منه بيده روى ومن شرب منه لم يرو وكذا رواه السدي عن أبي مالك عن ابن عباس وكذا قال قتادة وابن شوذب
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Baydhawi, Talut tested his army with a river, informing them that whoever drank from it would not be of his followers, with only those who took a handful with their hands being excepted. Most of the soldiers did not obey this command and drank excessively from the river, while only a small group (313, according to some views 3000 or 1000 people) obeyed the order and crossed the river. While some of those who crossed the river hesitated to fight Goliath's army, a small number who had certain faith that they would meet Allah said, 'A small group can overcome a large group by Allah's permission,' and thus encouraged them.

إن الله مبتليكم بنهر معاملكم معاملة المختبر بما اقترحتموه. فمن شرب منه فليس مني فليس من أشياعي، أو ليس بمتحد معي. ومن لم يطعمه فإنه مني
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to al-Zamakhshari, the expression 'of me' is used metaphorically to mean 'a part of me' due to the person's extreme attachment and closeness to himself. This usage follows the same logic as the hadith 'whoever deceives is not of us'; because deception is not among the deeds and attributes of believers, it is said 'is not of us.'

من غشنا فليس منا
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Al-Qurtubi clarifies that those who drank from the river were not removed from faith by this drinking, but were simply not counted among Talut's companions in this battle. He also explains the linguistic difference between 'talama' (to taste) and 'shariba' (to drink), referring to the jurisprudential consequences of water being considered 'ta'am' (food/sustenance), especially regarding the issue of riba (usury). Finally, he narrates the reports concerning the number of those who crossed the river and those who turned back upon seeing Goliath's army.

لم يخرجهم بذلك عن الإيمان

Comparison

Common ground

Most of the exegetes (Taberî, Ibn Kathir, Baydhawi, al-Qurtubi) agree that Talut tested his army with a river, that only those who took a handful of water passed the test, and that a small number of believers could overcome a large army by Allah's permission. Furthermore, the correspondence between the number of companions at the Battle of Badr and the number of believers who crossed the river (approximately three hundred and some) is transmitted as a common narration.

Differences

While Taberî and Ibn Kathir rely heavily on chains of narration (Ibn Abbas, Qatadah, al-Suddi, Bara' ibn Azib), Baydhawi and al-Qurtubi give more attention to linguistic and rhetorical analysis (elision of the verb, exception structures, the difference between talama and shariba). Al-Zamakhshari shifts the discussion entirely to a different point, the metaphorical usage of the expression 'of me'. Fahreddin al-Razi draws attention to the scattered structure of the text and includes in the discussion a separate verse issue (fasl/fitam); regarding numbers, different narrations among the exegetes are transmitted (313, 3000, 1000).

Historical context

From the early exegete Taberî onward, narration-based explanation remained constant, while in later periods (al-Zamakhshari, al-Razi, Baydhawi, al-Qurtubi) linguistic-rhetorical and jurisprudential inferences are systematically processed alongside narrations; this demonstrates that the exegetical tradition developed a method combining transmission with reasoning over time, yet the fundamental story and message have been preserved unchanged.

Modern connection

This story can be read as a reminder that a small but patient and sincere group, through steadfastness and trust in Allah, can overcome great obstacles. Today, this can be thought of as a lesson emphasizing the importance of sincerity and patience in facing difficulties, highlighting that it is intention and resolve, not quantity, that matters. Moreover, the fact that different exegetes approached the same story using different methodologies points to the value of diversity and respectful scholarship in the scholarly tradition.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar