ٱلَّذِى جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلْأَرْضَ فِرَٰشًا وَٱلسَّمَآءَ بِنَآءً وَأَنزَلَ مِنَ ٱلسَّمَآءِ مَآءً فَأَخْرَجَ بِهِۦ مِنَ ٱلثَّمَرَٰتِ رِزْقًا لَّكُمْ فَلَا تَجْعَلُوا۟ لِلَّهِ أَندَادًا وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

“Who hath appointed the earth a resting-place for you, and the sky a canopy; and causeth water to pour down from the sky, thereby producing fruits as food for you. And do not set up rivals to Allah when ye know (better).” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Taberî, this verse reminds people of the blessings that Allah has given to them, that He is the One who made the sky a ceiling, the earth a bed, sent down water from the sky and brought forth sustenance with it, and for this reason partners (equals) should not be associated with Him. The word 'endad' mentioned in the verse refers to idols and deities that people consider equal to Allah; these are beings that cannot cause benefit or harm. Taberî also explains through linguistic analysis why the word 'sema' is called by this name and reports the disagreement among exegetes regarding who this verse was revealed about (all polytheists or only the People of the Book).

وإنما ذكر السماء والأرض جل ثناؤه فيما عدد عليهم من نعمه التي أنعمها عليهم، لأن منهما أقواتهم وأرزاقهم ومعايشهم، وبهما قوام دنياهم، فأعلمهم أن الذي خلقهما وخلق جميع ما فيهما وما هم فيه من النعم هو المستحق عليهم الطاعة والمستوجب منهم الشكر والعبادة دون الأصنام والأوثان التي لا تضر ولا تنفع
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

Zemahşerî explains the phrase 've entüm ta'lemûn' in this verse in two ways: either it expresses that people committed betrayal knowingly and intentionally (not by mistake), or it means that they are knowledgeable people who can distinguish between the ugly and the beautiful. In this context, he mentions the story of Abu Lubaba regarding the Jews of Banu Qurayza, exemplifying his betrayal and the process of recognizing it and repenting.

وقيل وأنتم تعلمون أنكم تخونون ، يعني أن الخيانة توجد منكم عن تعمد لا عن سهو . وقيل : وأنتم علماء تعلمون قبح القبيح وحسن الحسن
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

In this section, Râzî examines the evidential system in the verses; he explains that water coming down from the sky reaches the earth through clouds, that the letter 'min' carries the meaning of partitiveness (tashdid) or clarification, that the word 'semerât' through its plural-diminutive form indicates the scarcity of worldly blessings and the greatness of the Hereafter, and that the concept of 'endâd' (equals) - people equating their idols with Allah - is criticized through an ironic expression. Furthermore, he presents a symbolic classification by likening different types of knowledge (monotheism, jurisprudence, asceticism, knowledge of heresy) to four types of water.

أحدهما : التبعيض لأن المنكرين أعني ماء ورزقا يكتنفانه وقد قصد بتنكيرهما معنى البعضية فكأنه قيل وأنزلنا من السماء بعض الماء فأخرجنا به بعض الثمرات ليكون بعض رزقكم
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

In this section, Kurtubî explains the different meanings of the verb 'ceale' (to make, to create, to name, to take, superfluous letter) with examples; he also conveys the view of the People of the Sunnah regarding acquiring wealth and analyzes the word 'end' (partner/associate) linguistically. He explains that the sky is like a ceiling for the earth, and clarifies why sustenance is called sustenance even before possession. He also explains in two ways how the address to disbelievers and hypocrites is consistent with the phrase 'you know'.

تقدم معناه هنا صير لتعديه إلى مفعولين ويأتي بمعنى خلق ومنه قوله تعالى : ما جعل الله من بحيرة ولا سائبة وقوله : وجعل الظلمات والنور ويأتي بمعنى سمى
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Ibn Kesîr, the prohibition of taking 'endâd' (partners/equals) in the verse encompasses taking idols or similar things that cannot cause benefit or harm to Allah as elements of association with Him; this includes hidden types of shirk as much as open shirk - for example, such phrases as 'If Allah wills and so-and-so wills'. The text reports that the Prophet forbade these kinds of expressions and that instead they should be ordered as 'If Allah wills, then so-and-so wills'. Furthermore, quoting Ibn Abbas, it is stated that this hidden shirk is more concealed than an ant's trace on a black stone in the darkness of night.

قال الأنداد هو الشرك أخفى من دبيب النمل على صفاة سوداء في ظلمة الليل وهو أن يقول والله وحياتك يافلان وحياتي
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Beydâvî states in this verse that 'making the earth a bed' does not necessarily require it to be flat; rather, it means that some parts of it emerged from water and became visible, and it is made ready for sitting and sleeping on it with a structure that is intermediate between hardness and softness. He also explains three different uses of the verb 'ceale' (in the sense of becoming, in the sense of creation, in the sense of transformation) linguistically and shows that its use here is in the sense of transformation with two objects. He expresses that the water sent down from the sky is made a cause and substance in bringing forth fruits, and that although Allah is capable of creating this directly without causes, He follows a gradual path.

وذلك لا يستدعي كونها مسطحة

Comparison

Common ground

Taberî, Kurtubî and Beydâvî address the layers of meaning of the verb 'ceale' and the functional description of the sky and earth through linguistic analysis; Taberî, Râzî, Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr unite on the point that the concept of 'endâd' is interpreted as things associated with Allah that cannot cause benefit or harm, and that this means shirk. In general, all exegetes read the verse in the context of reminding of Allah's blessings and the emphasis on monotheism.

Differences

Taberî, using a report-oriented method, conveys the views of the Companions and Successors and includes discussion about who the verse addresses (polytheists or the People of the Book), while Zemahşerî addresses the issue in a completely different context (the story of Abu Lubaba, betrayal and intentional action) and presents a reading based on language and rhetoric. While Râzî expands the matter through theological/philosophical reasoning and symbolic-metaphorical comparisons (likening types of knowledge to water), Kurtubî gives more space to jurisprudential conclusions (acquiring wealth, sectarian differences). Ibn Kesîr, on the other hand, extends the concept of 'endâd' beyond open shirk and connects it to the concept of hidden shirk (showing off, oaths) through hadith reports; this is an emphasis not found in the others. Beydâvî differs from the others by specifically emphasizing that 'making the earth a bed' does not mean flatness and enters into a physical/linguistic detail not found in the others. These differences arise from: Taberî's report-based tafsir, Zemahşerî's rhetoric/Mu'tazilite method, Râzî's theological-philosophical approach, Kurtubî's jurisprudential orientation, Ibn Kesîr's hadith-centered Salafi stance, and Beydâvî's concise linguistic style.

Historical context

From the earliest exegete Taberî to the latest Beydâvî, the fundamental message of monotheism and the meaning of 'endâd' as shirk remained fixed; however, over time the method of tafsir evolved from a report-oriented approach (Taberî) to more systematic linguistic and theological analyses (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Beydâvî), and with Ibn Kesîr a return to hadith and report is seen. Kurtubî, on the other hand, maintains both approaches (linguistic analysis and jurisprudential-report method) together, displaying an intermediate position. This reflects the multi-layered structure of the tafsir tradition that has diversified over time but preserved the fundamental message of monotheism.

Modern connection

Ibn Kesîr's extension of the concept of 'endâd' to hidden shirk (showing off, ostentation, insincere loyalties) is thought-provoking for today's person who may unconsciously place wealth, status or success at the center of their life. This reading can remind us that the effort to preserve sincerity in worship and daily choices requires questioning the true source to which the heart is directed, rather than external appearance. Râzî's symbolic approach to the relationship between knowledge and faith, on the other hand, can offer careful inspiration that scientific knowledge and monotheistic consciousness can proceed together without conflict.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar