ثُمَّ أَفِيضُوا۟ مِنْ حَيْثُ أَفَاضَ ٱلنَّاسُ وَٱسْتَغْفِرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ
“Then hasten onward from the place whence the multitude hasteneth onward, and ask forgiveness of Allah. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
Taberî states that the addressee of the command 'then depart from where the people depart' is the Quraysh and the Arabs known as Hums who were with them. The Quraysh, considering themselves as people of the Sacred Sanctuary, did not ascend to Arafat but performed the departure from Muzdalifah; with this verse, Allah commanded them as well as other people to depart from Arafat. Taberî explains that he prefers this view by basing it on the consensus of the commentators on this matter.
والذي نراه صوابا من تأويل هذه الآية، أنه عنى بهذه الآية قريشا ومن كان متحمسا معها من سائر العرب لإجماع الحجة من أهل التأويل على أن ذلك تأويله
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Râzî first explains that the true meaning of seeking forgiveness is not merely words spoken with the tongue but also requires repentance with the heart; the real matter is that each person regrets the shortcomings shown in obedience and resolves not to repeat them again. Then he presents three views regarding whom the word 'nâs' in the phrase 'summa afîdû' refers to: those who depart from Arafat (the people other than Hums), Abraham and Ishmael (peace be upon them) and those who follow their tradition, or according to Zuhrî's view, Adam. Separate evidences and objections are listed for each of these views.
فالمراد منه الاستغفار باللسان مع التوبة بالقلب ، وهو أن يندم على كل تقصير منه في طاعة الله ويعزم على أن لا يقصر فيما بعد
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the address in the verse 'then depart from where the people depart' is directed to the Quraysh and those known as Hums; they did not stand at Arafat but stood at Muzdalifah and said 'we are the neighbors of Allah' and did not expand the Hill region. The verse commanded them to depart from Arafat, which is the station of Abraham, together with other people. Kurtubî prefers this view to Dahhak's view that 'what is meant by the people is Abraham,' basing himself on authentic reports from Aisha.
وفي صحيح مسلم عن عائشة قالت : الحمس هم الذين أنزل الله فيهم : ثم أفيضوا من حيث أفاض الناس قالت : كان الناس يفيضون من عرفات وكان الحمس يفيضون من المزدلفة يقولون : لا نفيض إلا من الحرم فلما نزلت : أفيضوا من حيث أفاض الناس رجعوا إلى عرفات وهذا نص صريح ومثله كثير صحيح فلا معول على غيره من الأقوال
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, what is meant by 'nâs' in the verse is the people descending from Arafat like a flood, and 'ifâda' is from Arafat and not from Muzdalifah; the address is directed to the Quraysh, since the Quraysh stood at Muzdalifah (Jam') and considered themselves superior to other people, with this verse they were commanded to descend from Arafat in the same manner as other people. Furthermore, the particle 'summa' is used to indicate the difference between two departures. According to another view, the departure refers to the movement from Muzdalifah to Mina and the address is general. When 'an-Nâs' is read as 'an-Nâsî' with a difference in reading, it then refers to Adam, and the meaning is that the departure from Arafat was an ancient law that should not be changed.
والخطاب مع قريش كانوا يقفون بجمع وسائر الناس بعرفة ويرون ذلك ترفعا عليهم، فأمروا بأن يساووهم
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr conveys the report that the word 'an-nâs' in the expression 'thumma afîdû min haytu afâda an-nâs' in the verse refers to Abraham (peace be upon him); however, Ibn Jarîr reports the consensus of the majority in opposition to this view, stating that what is meant by 'an-nâs' is all people (Arabs other than the Quraysh/those who are not Hums). He also includes a report from Ibn Abbas regarding whether 'ifâda' is from Arafat or from Muzdalifah to Mina. The text, in connection with the command to seek forgiveness mentioned in the continuation of the verse, conveys various invocations of seeking forgiveness from the Prophet and related hadith reports.
ولولا إجماع الحجة على خلافه لكان هو الأرجح
Comparison
Common ground
All commentators agree that the command 'depart from where the people depart' in the verse is primarily directed at the Quraysh and Hums, who, according to pre-Islamic custom, did not ascend to Arafat but stood at Muzdalifah and considered themselves privileged compared to other Arabs. This contextual reading based on reports (especially from Aisha and Ibn Abbas) creates a common ground in Taberî, Kurtubî, Beydâvî, and Ibn Kesîr; Râzî also transmits this view.
Differences
The point of divergence is what the word 'an-nâs' refers to: while Taberî and Ibn Kesîr base themselves on the consensus of the majority and say that this refers to people other than Hums, Râzî lists three different views (the people, Abraham and Ishmael, Adam) with their evidences; Kurtubî mentions and refutes Dahhak's view of 'Abraham'; Beydâvî, based on a difference in reading, adds an alternative semantic layer with the reading 'an-Nâsî' that refers to Adam. These differences stem from the commentators' preference for methods that are either report-oriented (Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr) or language and rhetoric-oriented (Râzî, Beydâvî).
Historical context
While the report and consensus-based interpretation remained constant from Taberî to Ibn Kesîr, in later commentators like Râzî and Beydâvî, it is evident that linguistic and reading-based alternative interpretations were processed more systematically. The basic historical context (the custom of the Quraysh at Muzdalifah) was preserved unchanged; only the layers of interpretation and methods of justification diversified over time.
Modern connection
This verse can be considered as an example of the importance of abandoning claims of societal privilege and uniting around a common practice and solidarity. The various readings of the same verse by different commentators remind us that multiple interpretations in the scholarly tradition can be seen as an enrichment, and a tolerant approach without reducing to a single absolute truth is possible. Furthermore, the consciousness of equality and unity in acts of worship can be contemplated in contemporary contexts through the themes of social solidarity and humility.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar