أَوْ كَصَيِّبٍ مِّنَ ٱلسَّمَآءِ فِيهِ ظُلُمَٰتٌ وَرَعْدٌ وَبَرْقٌ يَجْعَلُونَ أَصَٰبِعَهُمْ فِىٓ ءَاذَانِهِم مِّنَ ٱلصَّوَٰعِقِ حَذَرَ ٱلْمَوْتِ وَٱللَّهُ مُحِيطٌۢ بِٱلْكَٰفِرِينَ

“Or like a rainstorm from the sky, wherein is darkness, thunder and the flash of lightning. They thrust their fingers in their ears by reason of the thunder-claps, for fear of death, Allah encompasseth the disbelievers (in His guidance, His omniscience and His omnipotence).” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

This text conveys that the concept of 'sayyib' (rain metaphor) in the verse represents the condition of the hypocrites; while the hypocrites outwardly pronounce the word of faith (lightning/light), they carry within themselves doubt and the darkness of misguidance (zulumât). Their fear of the thunder sounds and placing their fingers in their ears is represented by the fear they feel from Allah's punishment and anxiety about destruction. Taberî notes that different expressions transmitted from the Companions (Ibn Abbas, Ibn Masud, Mujahid, Qatadah, Suddi, etc.) may vary in wording but are close in meaning, and all of them describe the hypocrite's outward faith and the misguidance within them.

وهذه الأقوال التي ذكرنا عمن رويناها عنه، فإنها وإن اختلفت فيها ألفاظ قائليها متقاربات المعاني لأنها جميعا تنبئ عن أن الله ضرب الصيب لظاهر إيمان المنافق مثلا ومثل ما فيه من ظلمات بضلالته، وما فيه من ضياء برق بنور إيمانه
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

Zemahşerî in this text states that what is sent down from the sky does not necessarily have to be only rain, and what is meant here is stones (siccîl). According to him, the expression is as if it means 'rain stones upon us'; siccîl being stones marked for punishment. Thus a style has been preferred in which these stones are placed instead of water.

كأنه يريد أن يقال : فأمطر علينا السجيل وهي الحجارة المسومة للعذاب ، فوضع الماء
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Râzî, the expression 'hazerü'l-mevt' is in the accusative case as a maf'ûl lahu (object of the cause), meaning due to fear of death. Since fearing death is already a condition that exists in everyone, the specific mention of this condition here points to the fact that the cause of death in that event (such as plague or a command for war) was more intense. Additionally, it is stated that what is sent down from the sky is not an army, but a thunderous cry (sayha) that extinguishes their fires and ruins their dwellings.

فهو منصوب لأنه مفعول له ، أي لحذر الموت ، ومعلوم أن كل أحد يحذر الموت ، فلما خص هذا الموضع بالذكر ، علم أن سبب الموت كان في تلك الواقعة أكثر ، إما لأجل غلبة الطاعون أو لأجل الأمر بالمقاتلة
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Kurtubî in this section addresses several different parts of verses in succession: regarding ra'd, the majority view states that it is an audible sound produced by an angel; savâiq are the fire that comes forth from the mouth of the angel of thunder when he becomes angry. Furthermore, the word 'muhît' is explained as Allah encompassing all His creatures with His power, and encompassing the disbelievers in terms of knowledge or destruction. Finally, in the story of the people who died and were revived, the authentic view transmitted is that they died while fleeing from plague/tâun, and were then revived by the supplication of a prophet.

قال أبن عباس ومجاهد وغيرهما : إذا اشتد غضب الرعد الذي هو الملك طار النار من فيه وهي الصواعق
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Ibn Kesîr, in this verse the precautions and measures of the hypocrites provide them no benefit, because Allah's power has encompassed them and they are under Allah's will and determination. Additionally, he points out that in Surat al-Nur two similitudes are also presented for the disbelievers.

أي ولا يجدي عنهم حذرهم شيئا لأن الله محيط بقدرته وهم تحت مشيئته وإرادته
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, 'or' (aw) here expresses that both similitudes (the metaphors of rain and the person who kindles fire) are equally valid in describing the condition of the hypocrites, and the listener is free to construct the similitude with whichever of the two he wishes; it is not for doubt in equivalence. Sayyib (rain or cloud) can mean rain or cloud, and the indefinite form points to a severe type of rain. The sky coming in the definite form (al-samâ) points to the cloud covering the entire horizon, since every layer of the sky is also called 'samâ'.

ومعناه أن قصة المنافقين مشبهة بهاتين القصتين، وأنهما سواء في صحة التشبيه بهما، وأنت مخير في التمثيل بهما أو بأيهما شئت

Comparison

Common ground

All the commentators together establish the basic axis of the verse as the conflict between the hypocrites' outward faith and the doubt/misguidance within them, expressed through representative/metaphorical style. Moreover, most commentators (Taberî, Kurtubî, Beydâvî) accept that natural elements such as 'sayyib', 'ra'd', 'savâiq', though they may be real natural phenomena, are used in the verse as a means of representation and simile that represents the psychological state of the hypocrites (fear, hesitation, deafness). Linguistic and rhetorical analysis (word derivation, the function of particles, the relationship between metaphor and simile) emerges as a common methodological element in almost every commentator.

Differences

While Taberî and Kurtubî rely primarily on Companion and Successor transmissions (Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, Qatadah, etc.) to ground the meaning of the verse through chains of transmission, Zemahşerî and Beydâvî largely focus on pure linguistic and rhetorical analysis (the distinction between siccîl and rain, the function of the particle 'aw', the difference between indefinite and definite forms); they rely less on transmission. Râzî, however, presents a more analytical/rational reading by using grammatical analysis (maf'ûl lahu analysis) and logical-contextual inference to argue that the expression 'hazerü'l-mevt' points to a specific situation. Ibn Kesîr addresses the subject within a broader framework through comparative reading between verses (connection with Surat al-Nur). Kurtubî's explanation of ra'd and savâiq based on angels differs from Râzî's interpretation of them as 'thunderous cry/sayha'; this reveals a difference in ecological/theological approach regarding the role of angels in natural phenomena.

Historical context

The oldest commentator, Taberî (3rd-4th century), in a period when transmission-based exegesis was dominant, attempts to bring together Companion and Successor transmissions and show that the differences in wording point to unity of meaning. In the period of Zemahşerî (6th century, Mu'tazilite) and Beydâvî (7th century), linguistic and rhetorical analysis, as well as grammatical interpretation, become more systematic and central methods of exegesis; transmission recedes into the background. With Râzî (6th-7th century), theological/logical reasoning and grammatical analysis deepen further, and the historical-wisdom relationship underlying the verse is questioned. Kurtubî (7th century) provides a more encyclopedic synthesis by combining transmission with linguistic analysis. With Ibn Kesîr (8th century), transmission-based exegesis returns to prominence, but this time a comparative reading method between verses comes to the fore. In general, as the period advances, a shift in weight can be observed from transmission-based exegesis to linguistic/rhetorical and logical-contextual exegesis, though the line of representative/metaphorical reading remains constant throughout all periods.

Modern connection

The way in which commentators have diversified their methods over the centuries, moving from transmission to linguistic analysis, and from there to logical-contextual reading, reminds us that different branches of knowledge (transmission, linguistics, logic) can be used in a complementary manner in understanding a text; this can inspire an attitude in modern times that encourages harmony between knowledge and faith, multi-faceted learning without adhering to a single perspective. Furthermore, the theme of the apparent-hidden conflict at the heart of the verse can be considered as a thoughtful reminder about valuing consistency between word and essence in daily life, that is, sincerity and integrity in family and social relations. The ability of different periods and schools to approach the same verse respectfully from various angles can support a spirit of respectful dialogue toward different interpretations and knowledge traditions in contemporary times.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar