إِذْ تَبَرَّأَ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱتُّبِعُوا۟ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوا۟ وَرَأَوُا۟ ٱلْعَذَابَ وَتَقَطَّعَتْ بِهِمُ ٱلْأَسْبَابُ
“(On the day) when those who were followed disown those who followed (them), and they behold the doom, and all their aims collapse with them.” — M. M. Pickthall
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the expression 'and'ad' (equals/partners) primarily refers to the great ones and leaders (masters and chiefs) whom the polytheists considered as gods and equated with Allah; according to the view of Sufis and the gnostics, everything that occupies the heart away from Allah also falls within the scope of this 'nidd'. It has been noted that on the Day of Judgment, those who were followed will disassociate themselves from their followers, and all bonds between them (asbab) will be severed; these asbab have been interpreted in seven different ways such as kinship, friendship, covenant, oaths, uniting on disbelief, or worldly positions, but it has been indicated that 'al-azhar' encompasses all of them.
القول الثالث : في تفسير الأنداد قول الصوفية والعارفين ، وهو أن كل شيء شغلت قلبك به سوى الله تعالى ، فقد جعلته في قلبك ندا لله تعالى
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the 'disassociators' mentioned in this verse have been interpreted as the masters and chiefs followed by the disbelievers, transmitted from Katâda, Ata, and Rabî', and from Katâda and Suddî it has been transmitted as the devils who lead people astray. Kurtubî states that this expression applies generally to every followed and follower. Furthermore, it has been explained that the word 'asbab' refers to worldly connections such as kinship, the word originally comes from the meaning of a rope used to pull something, and according to Suddî and Ibn Zayd it refers to deeds.
يعني السادة والرؤساء تبرءوا ممن اتبعهم على الكفر عن قتادة وعطاء والربيع وقال قتادة أيضا والسدي : هم الشياطين المضلون تبرءوا من الإنس
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this text describes how the angels who were worshipped in the world distance themselves from and reject their worshippers on the Day of Judgment. When they see the punishment, they will have no means of escape, will find nowhere to turn from the fire or to take refuge. This situation has been mentioned as one of the proofs showing their loss and destruction.
تبرأت منهم الملائكة الذين كانوا يزعمون أنهم يعبدونهم في الدار الدنيا فتقول الملائكة أي عاينوا عذاب الله وتقطعت بهم الحيل وأسباب الخلاص ولم يجدوا عن النار معدلا ولا مصرفا
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, this verse describes how on the Day of Judgment those who were followed (the leaders) will disassociate themselves from their followers; however, it has also been transmitted that when read in reverse, the followers disassociate themselves from their leaders. The word 'asbab' expressing the bonds between them refers to the bonds of loyalty and religious unity that united them in the world and the motives that prompted these bonds. The wish of the followers to return to the world and disassociate from their leaders is in vain; for Allah will show them their deeds as a means of regret and their exit from the fire will not be possible.
إذ تبرأ الذين اتبعوا من الذين اتبعوا بدل من إذ يرون، أي إذ تبرأ المتبوعون من الأتباع. وقرئ بالعكس، أي تبرأ الأتباع من الرؤساء
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, what is meant by the expressions 'al-ladhîna ittaba'û' and 'al-ladhîna ittaba'û' is the distancing of the leaders followed in polytheism from their followers on the Day of Judgment; this disassociation encompasses all leaders of disbelief and misguidance and is not specific to a particular group. Furthermore, regarding the word 'al-asbab', different views have been transmitted among the exegetes such as worldly friendship/union, dwellings, kinship bonds, and deeds in the world; Taberî notes that all of these fall within the linguistic scope of the word cause/means.
والسبب الحبل، والأسباب جمع سبب، وهو كل ما تسبب به الرجل إلى طلبته وحاجته
Comparison
Common ground
All five exegetes agree that the verse describes how on the Day of Judgment the worldly bonds (asbab) between those who were followed and their followers will be severed, and those who were followed will disassociate themselves from their followers. Furthermore, there is shared emphasis that the word 'asbab' can encompass multiple meanings such as kinship, friendship, and deeds, and that this diversity in exegesis should be evaluated with a general inclusivity (umum). Taberî, Kurtubî, and Râzî transmit similar reports from the earlier exegetes (Katâda, Ata, Rabî', Suddî, Mujahid, Ibn Zayd).
Differences
Râzî emphasizes linguistic and rhetorical analysis and adds Sufi symbolic interpretation, broadening the concept of 'and'ad' to everything that preoccupies the heart from Allah; this reflects the later period characteristic of kalām and Sufi accumulation. Ibn Kesîr remains report-focused and narrowly confines the subject to the context of angel worship. Beydâvî concentrates on variant readings and i'rab analysis, bringing the linguistic and rhetorical dimension to the fore, and also transmits the possibility of the verse being read in reverse. Taberî and Kurtubî remain satisfied with presenting the reports of the Companions comparatively without adding excessive interpretations. These differences depend on the period and method each exegete belongs to (hadîth-based exegesis, rational/rhetorical exegesis, symbolic exegesis).
Historical context
The earliest exegete Taberî presents a simple report-focused approach, while later on Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr continued a similar report-based line, with Ibn Kesîr concentrating on the context of angel worship. In later exegetes such as Beydâvî and Râzî, linguistic, rhetorical, and variant reading analyses as well as Sufi interpretations have come into play, enriching the layers of exegesis. While the fundamental meaning (the disassociation of those who were followed) remained fixed, the interpretive tools and expanded scope diversified over time.
Modern connection
This comparative reading invites reflection on the true value of the things (persons, positions, habits) that occupy and attach the human heart; this can be related to the themes of sincerity and self-examination. At the same time, it offers an opportunity to think about what foundations human relationships (friendship, solidarity) are built upon and the importance of firm and sincere bonds in social relations. The fact that exegetes approached the same verse through different methods (hadîth, linguistic, symbolic) can be seen as an example of a multi-faceted and respectful reading culture in the scholarly tradition.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar