وَقَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ لَوْلَا يُكَلِّمُنَا ٱللَّهُ أَوْ تَأْتِينَآ ءَايَةٌ كَذَٰلِكَ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِم مِّثْلَ قَوْلِهِمْ تَشَٰبَهَتْ قُلُوبُهُمْ قَدْ بَيَّنَّا ٱلْـَٔايَٰتِ لِقَوْمٍ يُوقِنُونَ
“And those who have no knowledge say: Why doth not Allah speak unto us, or some sign come unto us? Even thus, as they now speak, spake those (who were) before them. Their hearts are all alike. We have made clear the revelations for people who are sure.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, there is disagreement among the commentators regarding whom is meant by the expression 'lâ ya'lemûn' (those who do not know) in the verse: some have said it refers to Christians, some to Jews, and some to Arab polytheists. Taberî stated that the view he preferred was that it refers to Arab polytheists; however, he reports that the identity in the expression 'those who speak similar words' encompasses Jews and Christians, because those meant by 'lâ ya'lemûn' are the Arabs. Furthermore, he reports that the expression 'levlâ yükellimunâ' is a form of wish/interrogative desire meaning 'if only he had spoken to us,' and that an example from Arab poetry is provided for this.
وأولى هذه الأقوال بالصحة والصواب قول القائل: إن الله تعالى عنى بقوله: يعني جل ثناؤه بقوله: العرب، فإنه قائل قولا لا خبر بصحته ولا برهان على حقيقته في ظاهر الكتاب.
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî presents two possibilities regarding whom the expression 'before them' in the verse refers to: either it refers to males who have reached the age of maturity, or it is a repetition for the purpose of emphasis and reinforcement of those mentioned earlier. According to this latter view, the priority of the emigrants stems from the fact that they settled in the land of emigration and in faith before others. Furthermore, according to another view, the expression 'before them' points to the time before the emigration of the emigrants.
أو الذين ذكروا من قبلهم في قوله : من باب التكرير والتوكيد ، كقوله تعالى : من قبل المهاجرين ؛ لأنهم سبقوهم في تبوىء دار الهجرة والإيمان
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Râzî explains the concepts of muhkam and mutashâbih from their linguistic origin. If a word does not carry the possibility of meaning other than one meaning, it is nass; if it is inclined toward one meaning but also possible in another, it is zâhir/mu'awwal; if it is equally possible in two meanings, it is mushtarak/mujmal; the common name of nass and zâhir that are inclined is muhkam, while the common name of mujmal and mu'awwal is called mutashâbih. This equality or ambiguity that is the cause of unintelligibility is expressed through the term 'mutashâbih' by means of giving the name of the cause to the thing caused.
فقد خرج من التقسيم الذي ذكرناه أن اللفظ إما أن يكون نصا ، أو ظاهرا ، أو مؤولا ، أو مشتركا ، أو مجملا ، أما النص والظاهر فيشتركان في حصول الترجيح ، إلا أن النص راجح مانع من الغير ، والظاهر راجح غير مانع من الغير ، فهذا القدر المشترك هو المسمى بالمحكم
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Kurtubî reports the different views of exegetes such as Ibn Abbas, Mujâhid, Rabî', Suddî, and Katâde regarding whom the expression 'al-ladhîna lâ ya'lamûn' refers to: according to some, it refers to Jews, according to some to Christians, and according to some to Arab polytheists. Furthermore, he explains that the particle 'lâ wlâ' is used here in the sense of 'halâ' (urging/encouragement), different from the lâ wlâ that indicates prevention, from a linguistic perspective. The meaning of the text is interpreted as a statement demanding God's direct speech about the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad or the bringing of a miracle/sign.
وليست هذه لولا التي تعطى منع الشيء لوجود غيره والفرق بينهما عند علماء اللسان أن لولا بمعنى التحضيض لا يليها إلا الفعل مظهرا أو مقدرا والتي للامتناع يليها الابتداء وجرت العادة بحذف الخبر
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this verse indicates that the proofs regarding the truthfulness of the prophets are explained in such a way that they do not leave room for further questions or additions for those who believe and confirm and follow the messengers. Those whose hearts are sealed, upon whose hearing and sight a veil is placed, are the group that cannot benefit from these proofs. Furthermore, it is stated that the hearts of polytheist Arabs resemble the hearts of those before them in disbelief, stubbornness, and rebelliousness.
أي قد أوضحنا الدلالات على صدق الرسل بما لا يحتاج معها إلى سؤال آخر وزيادة أخرى لمن أيقن وصدق واتبع الرسل وفهم ماجاءوا به عن الله تبارك وتعالى
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Beydâvî notes that the demands of the polytheists or the obstinate among the People of the Book—such as 'Would God not speak with us?' or 'Would a miracle not come to us?'—resemble the demands of previous nations from Moses, such as asking God to appear openly or requesting that a table be sent down from heaven. This resemblance stems from the similarity of their hearts in blindness and stubbornness. The expression 'for those who bring certainty' refers to those who truly seek certainty or those who are free from doubt and stubbornness; it is stated that the verse points to the fact that such objections arise not from the concealment of the verses, but solely from stubbornness and transgression.
كذلك قال الذين من قبلهم من الأمم الماضية مثل قولهم فقالوا: أرنا الله جهرة. هل يستطيع ربك أن ينزل علينا مائدة من السماء تشابهت قلوبهم قلوب هؤلاء ومن قبلهم في العمى والعناد.
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, and Ibn Kesîr, relying on chains of transmission (Ibn Abbas, Mujâhid, Rabî', Suddî, Katâde), present Jews, Christians, or Arab polytheists as options regarding the identity of those meant by 'lâ ya'lamûn,' and they converge on the idea that the stubbornness/blindness in the hearts of these groups is similar to previous nations (Beydâvî, Ibn Kesîr). Zemahşerî, Râzî, and Kurtubî commonly resort to linguistic and rhetorical analysis (meanings of particles, word-meaning relationships) to clarify the layers of meaning in the verse.
Differences
While Taberî transmits a diversity of reports and prefers Arab polytheists, Kurtubî only conveys similar reports and does not make a definitive preference; Ibn Kesîr, on the other hand, moves the topic to a contextual/faith framework and concentrates on the theme of heart-sealing. Zemahşerî's focal point is entirely different, concerning the linguistic possibilities of a different expression (priority/time); Râzî focuses more on the linguistic origin of the muhkam-mutashâbih concepts than the content of the verse itself; Beydâvî emphasizes that the verse points to obstinate demands through comparative story-reading. These differences stem from the exegetes' areas of interest (report collection, linguistics, theology, exegetical method).
Historical context
While the early-period exegete Taberî relied heavily on report transmission, later-period exegetes (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Beydâvî) applied linguistic and rhetorical analysis to the verse more systematically, and Ibn Kesîr blended transmission with contextual/faith interpretation. The basic report material (names like Mujâhid, Katâde, Suddî) remained constant across all periods, but the methodological emphasis gradually broadened from reports to linguistic and theological analysis.
Modern connection
This comparative reading reminds us of the importance of approaching knowledge and evidence with an open heart; for the exegetes emphasize that most objections stem not from a lack of evidence but from the heart's closure. In this context, the lesson that there should be no contradiction sought between knowledge and faith, but rather that research and inquiry should be conducted with sincerity and an unbiased mind, offers meaningful guidance for today as well.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar