أَمْ تُرِيدُونَ أَن تَسْـَٔلُوا۟ رَسُولَكُمْ كَمَا سُئِلَ مُوسَىٰ مِن قَبْلُ وَمَن يَتَبَدَّلِ ٱلْكُفْرَ بِٱلْإِيمَٰنِ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ سَوَآءَ ٱلسَّبِيلِ
“Or would ye question your messenger as Moses was questioned aforetime? He who chooseth disbelief instead of faith, verily he hath gone astray from a plain road.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
Taberî addresses multiple verses consecutively in this section. He explains the expression 'Sawâ's-sebîl' (the level/middle path) as the middle of the road, the correct and intended path; he defines misguidance as going without guidance. He then reports different narrations regarding the reason for revelation of the verse 'Do you ask your prophet for something?' (including the request of Rafi' b. Hurayma and Wahb b. Zayd, the Quraysh's desire to turn Safa into gold, the comparison with the atonements of the Children of Israel) and discusses the linguistic meaning of the particle 'em'.
فإنه يعني بالسواء: القصد والمنهج، وأصل السواء: الوسط؛ ذكر عن عيسى بن عمر النحوي أنه قال: «ما زلت أكتب حتى انقطع سوائي» ، يعني وسطي.
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
Zemahşerî reports certain narrations while describing how Musa arrived in Midian: according to one view, he set out barefoot, was nourished only by tree leaves, and his feet became wounded; according to another view, an angel came to him riding a horse with a spear in his hand and took him to Midian. He then provides the text of the verse and reports Musa's arrival at the water of Midian, his helping the two women, and the story involving Shu'ayb.
وقيل : خرج حافيا لا يعيش إلا بورق الشجر ، فما وصل حتى سقط خف قدمه . وقيل : جاءه ملك على فرس بيده عنزة ، فانطلق به إلى مدين
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, the particle 'em' in the verse is munqatî'a (disconnected) and means 'bel' (rather); that is, it comes after a complete statement before the question. Furthermore, if the addressees in the verse referred to by 'from you' are those who believe, this is apparently clear, because a person performing such an action does not necessarily have to be a believer.
والمنقطعة لا تكون إلا بعد كلام تام ، لأنها بمعنى بل والألف ، كقول العرب : إنها الإبل أم شاء ، كأنه قال : بل هي شاء
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Kurtubî reports that the expression 'Sawâ's-sebîl' in the verse is explained in the context of the Children of Israel's deviation from the right path, their request that Prophet Moses clearly show them God, and similarly the polytheists' demand that the Prophet bring God and angels. He also notes that the word 'Sawâ' means 'middle/center', and according to some, it carries the meaning of 'qasd/right direction'. As the reason for revelation, it is reported that Rafi' b. Huzeymah and Wahb b. Zayd requested from the Prophet that he bring a book from heaven and cause rivers to flow.
وقيل : السواء القصد عن الفراء أي ذهب عن قصد الطريق وسمته أي طريق طاعة الله عز وجل وعن بن عباس أيضا أن سبب نزول هذه الآية أن رافع بن خزيمة ووهب بن زيد قالا للنبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : أئتنا بكتاب من السماء نقرؤه وفجر لنا أنهارا نتبعك
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, the question in the verse is a reproaching question that rejects making demands to the Prophet similar to those made to Moses, and this address encompasses both believers and disbelievers. He states that the Jews/Quraysh's demanding miracles from the Prophet in the same obstinate, denying, and contentious manner as the Children of Israel demanded from Moses is being censured. He expresses that those who make such requests have gone astray from the right path and turned toward ignorance and deviation.
والمراد أن الله ذم من سأل الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم عن شيء على وجه التعنت والإقتراح كما سألت بنو إسرائيل موسى عليه السلام تعنتا وتكذيبا وعنادا
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
This verse censures the People of the Book or the polytheists making a miraculous demand to the Prophet similar to those made to Moses (such as bringing down a book from heaven). According to Beydâvî, the particle 'em' expresses either an interrogation regarding the fact that they should know that God is capable of all things, or their attempt to make such a demand; furthermore, there is also the possibility that this particle is mustaqill (munqatî'), in which case the purpose is to advise servants to refrain from trusting in God and offering Him suggestions/proposals. A person who replaces disbelief with belief has deviated from the straight path.
أم معادلة للهمزة في ألم تعلم أي: ألم تعلموا أنه مالك الأمور قادر على الأشياء كلها يأمر وينهى كما أراد، أم تعلمون وتقترحون بالسؤال كما اقترحت اليهود على موسى عليه السلام. أو منقطعة والمراد أن يوصيهم بالثقة به وترك الاقتراح عليه.
Comparison
Common ground
Taberî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, and Beydâvî are united in the view that the verse censures making coercive/miraculous demands to the Prophet similar to those the Children of Israel made to Moses; the fact that 'Sawâ's-sebîl' means deviation from the right/middle path and that the particle 'em' is subject to linguistic discussion is also a shared point. The request of Rafi' b. Huzeymah and Wahb b. Zayd is cited as a common narration regarding the reason for revelation.
Differences
While Taberî and Kurtubî present multiple narrations regarding the reason for revelation side by side and emphasize linguistic analysis (sawâ, em), Râzî and Beydâvî discuss the possibilities of the particle 'em' being munqatî'a/mu'âdala within a more systematic rhetorical framework. Ibn Kesîr expands the scope of the censure without making a believer-disbeliever distinction, while Râzî emphasizes that the addressees do not necessarily have to be believers. Zemahşerî, on the other hand, reports narrations in a different context (Moses' going to Midian), which shows that he is focusing on a different verse/event in this section of the text.
Historical context
While the early period exegete Taberî lists numerous narrations and refrains from making a preference, in the middle period Zemahşerî and Râzî made linguistic/rhetorical analysis more systematic; in the later period Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr placed narrations within a certain contextual framework and clarified the theme of censure, while Beydâvî presented a concise synthesis with literary possibilities side by side. The basic meaning (a warning against deviating from the right path) remained constant, while the methods and emphases became more refined over time.
Modern connection
This verse can be read as a reminder that humans should trust in God and remain on the right path with patience, developing knowledge and faith in harmony rather than making unnecessary and coercive expectations. In social life, it can be considered that adopting a patient and constructive attitude rather than hasty and stubborn demands can contribute to both individual and social peace. Furthermore, a tolerant approach when engaging in dialogue with people having different thoughts and expectations is a measured lesson that can be drawn from this story.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar