فَلَمَّا دَخَلُوا۟ عَلَيْهِ قَالُوا۟ يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلْعَزِيزُ مَسَّنَا وَأَهْلَنَا ٱلضُّرُّ وَجِئْنَا بِبِضَٰعَةٍ مُّزْجَىٰةٍ فَأَوْفِ لَنَا ٱلْكَيْلَ وَتَصَدَّقْ عَلَيْنَآ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَجْزِى ٱلْمُتَصَدِّقِينَ

“And when they came (again) before him (Joseph) they said: O ruler! Misfortune hath touched us and our folk, and we bring but poor merchandise, so fill for us the measure and be charitable unto us. Lo! Allah will requite the charitable,” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Taberî, the expression 'bâdâatin müzcâh' refers to the worthless or small amount of goods that Joseph's brothers brought to Egypt; regarding the quality of this merchandise, various closely related views have been transmitted among the exegetes such as defective/flawed dirhams, incomplete/poor quality dirhams, Bedouin goods like wool and fat, worthless items like rope and sacks, or simply 'a small amount.' The author also explains through poetic examples that the root 'izcâ' originally means 'to drive, to propel,' and notes that the word signifies this weak and forcibly imposed merchandise.

وأصل الإزجاء: السوق بالدفع، كما قال النابغة الذبياني
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Zemahşerî, when Joseph's brothers said to him 'give us alms,' they meant something beyond their own share; their calling it alms was because that surplus was not obligatory upon them as a gift, for alms are forbidden to prophets (according to one view, alms were permissible to prophets other than our prophet). The text also states that the brothers showed humility toward Joseph and requested his mercy, whereupon Joseph took pity on them and revealed his identity. Furthermore, it is explained that the word 'alms' means a gift made in hope of reward from Allah, therefore one cannot say to Allah 'give me alms,' but rather should say 'give me, bestow upon me, have mercy on me.'

فسموا ما هو فضل وزيادة لا تلزمه صدقة ، لأن الصدقات محظورة على الأنبياء ، وقيل كانت تحل لغير نبينا . وسئل ابن عيينة عن ذلك فقال : ألم تسمع أراد أنها كانت حلالا لهم
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

Kurtubî interprets the brothers' coming to Joseph and saying 'hardship has touched us and our family' as an explicit expression of hunger and need; he states that this is not contrary to trust in Allah, and that informing someone from whom benefit is hoped about a difficult situation is permissible and sometimes even obligatory. He also transmits different interpretations of the request 'give us alms' (forgiving the price difference, returning the brothers, forgiving the surplus) and narrations about what the expression 'bidâa-i müzcâe' is (dried meat-broth, sack-rope, wool-fat, pistachio/carob seed, and the like).

وفي هذا دليل على جواز الشكوى عند الضر أي الجوع بل واجب عليه إذا خاف على نفسه الضر من الفقر وغيره أن يبدي حالته إلى من يرجو منه النفع
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

Ibn Kesîr explains that Jacob's sons, when they entered Egypt and came to Joseph, stated that the value of the provisions they had brought due to famine was small and worthless (of a defective/unacceptable type). Regarding this 'small/worthless payment,' he transmits different narrations from exegetes such as Mujâhid, Al-Hasan, Ibn Abbas, Qatâdah, Al-Suddî, Sa'îd b. Jubayr, Abû Sâlih and Dahhâk (defective dirhams, worthless items like sacks and ropes, pine nuts, etc.). He also supports with poetic examples that the expression 'bidâatin müzcâh' (small goods being forced upon someone) derives from the root 'izcâ' in the language, which means to propel a weak thing with great difficulty; finally, he transmits a narration through Sufyân b. Uyaynah and Mujâhid regarding the matter of whether alms-giving to prophets has been forbidden or not.

وقال ابن عباس الرديء لا ينفق مثل خلق الغرارة والحبل والشيء وفي رواية عنه الدراهم الرديئة التي لا تجوز إلا بنقصان وكذا قال قتادة والسدي وقال سعيد بن جبير هي الدراهم الفسول
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, Joseph's brothers on their second visit to Egypt complained of the severity of hunger, said they had brought a worthless or small amount of capital (bidâa müzcâh), and requested that he give them full measure, return their brother, or accept their goods and give them more as an act of charity. In this context, it has been debated whether alms-giving to prophets is forbidden and whether this is specific only to the Prophet. It is also noted that the word 'charity' originally means an absolute gift/kindness, but is designated in customary usage for gifts made for Allah's sake.

واختلف في أن حرمة الصدقة تعم الأنبياء عليهم الصلاة والسلام أو تختص بنبينا صلى الله عليه وسلم. إن الله يجزي المتصدقين أحسن الجزاء والتصدق التفضل مطلقا
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the text indicates that sailing ships in the sea is from Allah's mercy, through which people are able to seek sustenance and commerce. Furthermore, the concept 'يتصدق' is discussed in the text, stating that Allah does not give charity, that only the one who hopes for reward can give charity, and that what is requested from Allah should be in the form of 'give' or 'bestow.'

لأن الله لا يتصدق إنما يتصدق الذي يبتغي الثواب ، وإنما يقول : اللهم أعطني أو تفضل

Comparison

Common ground

Taberî, Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr unite on the point that the expression 'bidâatin müzcâh' refers to the small/worthless goods that the brothers brought to Egypt, and that the root 'izcâ' means 'to forcibly propel, to impose with difficulty'; concrete examples such as defective dirhams, wool-fat, sacks and ropes are transmitted from this shared narration pool. Zemahşerî, Beydâvî, Ibn Kesîr and Râzî agree that the request for 'charity/alms' cannot be attributed to Allah or to prophets, and that 'give, bestow' should be said instead; the Ibn Uyaynah narration is a shared foundation repeated at this point.

Differences

While Taberî and Ibn Kesîr remain largely confined to linguistic analysis and narration transmission, focusing on the concrete content of the word 'bidâa,' Zemahşerî, Beydâvî and Râzî elevate the matter to rhetorical and jurisprudential discussion (the question of whether alms-giving to prophets is forbidden), presenting a more theoretical framework. Kurtubî additionally emphasizes the balance between trust in Allah and communicating need, adding an ethical/practical dimension; these differences stem from the methodological priorities of the exegetes (linguistic-narration school vs. rhetoric-jurisprudence school).

Historical context

From Taberî through Râzî and Beydâvî, the fundamental linguistic and narration material has remained largely fixed, but over time interpretation has expanded from word analysis to jurisprudential-theological discussion (the ruling on alms-giving to prophets); in Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr, systematic compilation and organization of early narrations stands out.

Modern connection

This comparison reminds us that explicitly expressing one's situation in times of need does not conflict with trust in Allah, and may even be necessary; this can point to the fact that asking for help or sharing during difficulty is today a legitimate stance from the perspective of social solidarity. Furthermore, the sensitivity in word analysis serves as an example of how knowledge and linguistics work together in understanding matters of faith.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar