إِذْ قَالُوا۟ لَيُوسُفُ وَأَخُوهُ أَحَبُّ إِلَىٰٓ أَبِينَا مِنَّا وَنَحْنُ عُصْبَةٌ إِنَّ أَبَانَا لَفِى ضَلَٰلٍ مُّبِينٍ
“When they said: Verily Joseph and his brother are dearer to our father than we are, many though we be. Lo! our father is in plain aberration.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, this verse informs those who ask about the story of Joseph and his brothers that there are lessons in this situation; his brothers described themselves as a strong community of eleven people (asabe), and they saw their father Jacob's preference for Joseph and his brother from the same mother in affection as a clear error. The expression 'mubin' indicates that this error is self-evident to anyone who thinks and observes.
يعنون: إن أبانا يعقوب لفي خطأ من فعله في إيثاره يوسف وأخاه من أمه علينا بالمحبة، ويعني بالمبين أنه خطأ، يبين عن نفسه أنه خطأ لمن تأمله ونظر إليه.
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, the brothers claimed that they were a strong and useful community of ten people (asabe), while Joseph and Benjamin were small and useless children, and therefore they were more worthy of their father's affection. He also states that the expression 'inna na la-khasiroun' means that if they cannot protect their younger brothers, they will be destroyed or deserving of destruction due to weakness and incapacity. The text also notes that they responded to only one of their father's two excuses (such as the possibility of a wolf eating him) and ignored the other.
والعصبة والعصابة : العشرة فصاعدا . وقيل : إلى الأربعين ، سموا بذلك لأنهم جماعة تعصب بهم الأمور ويستكفون النوائب . وروي النزال بن سبرة عن علي رضي الله عنه : ( ونحن عصبة ) ، بالنصب .
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, Joseph and his brother being more beloved to their father caused jealousy in the other brothers; the reason for this is that despite the brothers being older in age, strong, and useful to their father, they were not prioritized in affection. Furthermore, it is stated that the brothers' speaking these words does not contradict their belief in Joseph's prophethood, because the condition of infallibility ('isma) was not required in the period before prophethood.
والجواب : أنه عليه السلام ما فضلهما على سائر الأولاد إلا في المحبة ، والمحبة ليست في وسع البشر فكان معذورا فيه ولا يلحقه بسبب ذلك لوم
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, 'Yusuf' mentioned in this verse is in the nominative case as the subject (mubtada), and the lam at the beginning is an emphatic lam specific to oath clauses; the expression means 'by God, Joseph and his brother...'. It is stated that the brothers did not intend to accuse their father of straying from the faith with the word 'dalal', but rather characterized his preference for two brothers over the ten brothers as a miscalculation or wrong choice.
لم يريدوا ضلال الدين إذ لو أرادوه لكانوا كفارا بل أرادوا لفي ذهاب عن وجه التدبير في إيثار اثنين على عشرة مع استوائهم في الانتساب إليه
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr states that when the brothers say 'we are a group', they express themselves as a large community, and their complaint is directed at Jacob's preference for Joseph and his brother over themselves (the majority). He also states that there is no definitive evidence that Joseph's brothers were prophets, and that on the contrary, the context of this verse points to the opposite. He notes that some people claim that revelation came to them after this event, but that this claim is without evidence, and that those who put forward this view rely only on a certain verse, which is insufficient.
واعلم أنه لم يقم دليل على نبوة إخوة يوسف وظاهر هذا السياق يدل على خلاف ذلك ومن الناس من يزعم أنهم أوحي إليهم بعد ذلك وفي هذا نظر ويحتاج مدعي ذلك على دليل
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
Beydâwî explains in this verse that Joseph's brothers criticized their father for loving him and Benjamin more than himself, claiming that they formed a strong community (usba) and were therefore more worthy of affection. Their statement that their father was in 'manifest deviation' because of this preference is attributed either to his preferring what is worthless or to his abandoning justice in affection. He also states according to a report that Joseph's father's love for him stemmed from certain signs (curiosities) in him, that this affection increased with him seeing the dream, and that the brothers' increasing jealousy drove them to harm him.
روي أنه كان أحب إليه لما يرى فيه من المخايل وكان إخوته يحسدونه، فلما رأى الرؤيا ضاعف له المحبة بحيث لم يصبر عنه، فتبالغ حسدهم حتى حملهم على التعرض له.
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes convey that the verse shows that in the story of Joseph, the brothers saw themselves as a strong and useful community (asabe/usba) and considered their father's preference for Joseph and Benjamin in affection to be an error or wrong choice. There is also agreement that expressions like 'mubin' and similar indicate that this situation is a clearly visible error.
Differences
While Taberî and Zemahşerî present a more language, rhetoric, and report-focused reading, Zemahşerî also draws attention to differences in recitation (qiraat) and the fact that one of the father's excuses goes unanswered. Râzî and Ibn Kesîr carry the matter to a theological-methodological discussion through the brothers' status of prophethood/infallibility; Râzî says these words do not contradict infallibility, while Ibn Kesîr argues there is no evidence that the brothers were prophets. Kurtubî presents a linguistic approach through i'rab and oath lam analysis, while particularly emphasizing that the brothers did not accuse their father of straying from the faith. Beydâwî adds a psychological context with report-based details (signs in Joseph, the dream).
Historical context
While early exegetes (Taberî, Zemahşerî) relied on reports and linguistic analysis, later exegetes (Râzî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, Beydâwî) addressed the matter within more systematic theological and methodological frameworks (prophethood, infallibility, i'rab analysis). The basic narrative remained fixed, but over time the discussion of theological depth and linguistic subtleties increased.