وَقَالَ يَٰبَنِىَّ لَا تَدْخُلُوا۟ مِنۢ بَابٍ وَٰحِدٍ وَٱدْخُلُوا۟ مِنْ أَبْوَٰبٍ مُّتَفَرِّقَةٍ وَمَآ أُغْنِى عَنكُم مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ مِن شَىْءٍ إِنِ ٱلْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَعَلَيْهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ ٱلْمُتَوَكِّلُونَ

“And he said: O my sons! Go not in by one gate; go in by different gates. I can naught avail you as against Allah. Lo! the decision rests with Allah only. In Him do I put my trust, and in Him let all the trusting put their trust.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this exegete, the exception in the verse is made to apply to both time and circumstance together; that is, it is meant that entry into the Prophet's houses was permitted only when permission was given and without observing the food. Zemahşerî explains this as an address to a group who watch the time of eating and come early and sit waiting for the food to be prepared; were this not a special circumstance, no one would be allowed to enter the Prophet's house except by special permission other than being invited to food.

معناه : لا تدخلوا يا هؤلاء المتحينون للطعام ، إلا أن يؤذن لكم إلى طعام غير ناظرين إياه ، وإلا فلو لم يكن لهؤلاء خصوصا ، لما جاز لأحد أن يدخل بيوت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إلا أن يؤذن له إذنا خاصا ، وهو الإذن إلى الطعام فحسب
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

Râzî first connects this verse to Ya'kub's command to his sons to enter from different gates, explaining that man is commanded in this world to obey the valid means in effect, but at the same time is commanded to firmly believe that nothing other than what Allah has decreed will occur; that precaution does not prevent fate. Then, when interpreting the expression 'That separation could not harm Allah in any way,' he discusses the matter of the evil eye (ayn) and supports with various narrations that the evil eye is real, but emphasizes that division/gathering has no effect against fate.

فإن الإنسان مأمور بأن يحذر عن الأشياء المهلكة ، والأغذية الضارة ، ويسعى في تحصيل المنافع ودفع المضار بقدر الإمكان ثم إنه مع ذلك ينبغي أن يكون جازما بأنه لا يصل إليه إلا ما قدره الله ولا يحصل في الوجود إلا ما أراده الله
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

This text indicates that the words Ya'kub spoke when warning his sons mean that human precaution would not benefit against fate; that is, no precaution taken can change fate when it occurs. Furthermore, in the text it is explained that the word 'tawakkul' means 'to trust and rely.'

أي لا ينفع الحذر مع القدر أي اعتمدت ووثقت
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Ibn Kesîr, Ya'kub's (peace be upon him) advice to his sons to enter Egypt from different gates is not to avert fate and Allah's decree; when Allah wills something, nothing can oppose it. The reason for this advice is shown to be protecting his sons from the evil eye when they enter as a group.

أي إن هذا الإحتراز لا يرد قدر الله وقضاءه إذا أراد شيئا لا يخالف ولا يمانع قالوا هي دفع إصابة العين لهم
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Taberî, the Prophet Ya'kub became afraid of the evil eye regarding his sons because they were beautiful and magnificent, and therefore commanded them to enter the city from different gates. He expressed that he could not avert Allah's decree against this evil eye, because Allah's judgment is effective in His creatures.

خشي يعقوب على ولده العين
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, Ya'kub's command to his sons to enter from different gates stems from his fear of the evil eye (ayn) if they entered together, because they had become known in Egypt for their beauty and reputation. This precaution does not change Allah's decree; it merely fulfilled a need of compassion in Ya'kub's soul, because true judgment and protection belong only to Allah.

لأنهم كانوا ذوي جمال وأبهة مشتهرين في مصر بالقربة والكرامة عند الملك، فخاف عليهم أن يدخلوا كوكبة واحدة فيعانوا

Comparison

Common ground

Except for Zemahşerî, the other five exegetes (Râzî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, Taberî, Beydâvî) interpret the same verse group—Ya'kub's command to his sons to enter from different gates—and agree that precaution cannot change fate, and that protection from the evil eye (nazar) is the reason for this command; Zemahşerî, however, addresses the issue of not entering the Prophet's house without permission in a different context.

Differences

While Zemahşerî's text focuses on linguistic/grammatical analysis (the structure of the exception encompassing time and circumstance), the others address the relationship between fate and precaution. In this group, Râzî takes the matter into theological/creedal discussion (compulsion-fate) and supports it with hadith narrations; Taberî and Ibn Kesîr offer simpler, more narration-based explanations; Kurtubî highlights the concept of 'tawakkul' through linguistic analysis; Beydâvî combines contextual analysis with hadith narration and ties the matter to Ya'kub's compassion.

Historical context

While early exegetes like Taberî were satisfied with simple narration-based explanations, later exegetes like Zemahşerî and Râzî deepened linguistic/grammatical and theological discussions; Kurtubî and Beydâvî summarized this accumulation by harmonizing language and narration in a balanced manner. The fundamental message (that precaution cannot change fate) remained constant throughout the periods; only the methods of explanation and depth varied.

Modern connection

These different readings remind us that taking reasonable precautions while having inner trust in Allah (tawakkul) is not a conflict but a wholeness. In daily life, while resorting to knowledge and precaution, leaving the outcome to divine decree can be understood as an attitude that nourishes both patience and peace. This balance can be presented as an example of striving to live both measured behavior and sincere submission together in family relations and social life.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar