فَإِن لَّمْ تَأْتُونِى بِهِۦ فَلَا كَيْلَ لَكُمْ عِندِى وَلَا تَقْرَبُونِ

“And if ye bring him not unto me, then there shall be no measure for you with me, nor shall ye draw near.” — M. M. Pickthall

Tafsirs

AI-generated
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified

In this text, Taberî explains the words that Yusuf spoke to his brothers: Yusuf informed them that unless they brought their brother from the same father (Benjamin), they would not receive any food to be measured out to them, and that they should not approach his land. Additionally, a brief grammatical explanation is provided regarding the linguistic structure of the verb 'لا تقربون'.

يقول تعالى ذكره مخبرا عن قيل يوسف لإخوته: بأخيكم من أبيكم، يقول: فليس لكم عندي طعام أكيله لكم، يقول: ولا تقربوا بلادي
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Zemahşerî, there are two interpretations (wujuh) in this expression: first, that the expression falls under the ruling of punishment and is in the subjunctive mood, being attributed to the position of the preceding statement; as if it were said 'if you do not bring him to me, you will be deprived and do not approach.' The second interpretation is that this expression carries the meaning of prohibition (nahiy).

أحدهما : أن يكون داخلا في حكم الجزاء مجزوما ، عطفا على محل قوله : كأنه قيل : فإن لم تأتوني به تحرموا ولا تقربوا ، وأن يكون بمعنى النهي
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to this text, when Yusuf requested that his brothers bring that brother (Benjamin) to him, he used both elements of encouragement (raghbah) and intimidation (tarhib) together. The fact that they were extremely in need of food and could only obtain it from Yusuf's presence shows that if they were prevented from coming into his presence, this would mean the greatest intimidation and threat for them.

لما طلب منهم إحضار ذلك الأخ جمع بين الترغيب والترهيب . أما الترغيب : فهو قوله : وذلك لأنهم كانوا في نهاية الحاجة إلى تحصيل الطعام ، وما كان يمكنهم تحصيله إلا من عنده ، فإذا منعهم من الحضور عنده كان ذلك نهاية الترهيب والتخويف
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Kurtubî, Yusuf did not tell his brothers that they could no longer approach him and would not be able to return again, but only encouraged them to return. To bring about this return, he demanded a hostage from them, and the brothers left Şem'ûn (Simeon) as a hostage in his care. The reason for Şem'ûn's selection was that on the day of the well incident, he was the person whose words were most beautiful and whose opinion was most sound.

قال السدي : وطلب منهم رهينة حتى يرجعوا فارتهن شمعون عنده قال الكلبي : إنما اختار شمعون منهم لأنه كان يوم الجب أجملهم قولا وأحسنهم رأيا
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Ibn Kesîr, this expression is a warning that Yusuf gave to his brothers: if they do not bring their brother (Benjamin) with them on their second visit, they will no longer be given any grain (provisions).

أي إن لم تقدموا به معكم في المرة الثانية فليس لكم عندي ميرة
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified

According to Beydâvî, Yusuf conditioned that his brothers bring Benjamin, their brother from the same father, after he prepared and equipped their provisions; otherwise he would not give them a measuring vessel and would not allow them to approach him. The brothers said that they would work very hard to ask their father for him and would show no negligence in this matter. The text also relates a report that Yusuf asked them about their identities, how many they were, where their brothers were, and that he asked them to leave one as a hostage and bring Benjamin to prove their truthfulness.

فإن لم تأتوني به فلا كيل لكم عندي ولا تقربون أي ولا تقربوني ولا تدخلوا دياري، وهو إما نهي أو نفي معطوف على الجزاء. قالوا سنراود عنه أباه سنجتهد في طلبه من أبيه. وإنا لفاعلون ذلك لا نتوانى فيه.

Comparison

Common ground

All exegetes accept that the verse shows Yusuf conditioning that his brothers bring Benjamin and that in return grain would be given or not given. The grammatical aspect regarding the expression 'لا تقربون' being related to prohibition or conditional-consequence structure is also (Taberî, Zemahşerî, Kurtubî) a commonly emphasized point.

Differences

While Taberî and Zemahşerî predominantly resolve the structure of the expression through linguistic/i'rab analysis, Fahreddin er-Râzî interprets the matter contextually within the balance of encouragement-intimidation (raghbah-tarhib). Kurtubî and Beydâvî, on the other hand, add narrative details such as Şem'ûn being left as a hostage based on reports (from Suddî, Kalbî); Ibn Kesîr's interpretation is in the nature of a plain contextual summary. These differences reflect the different methodological tendencies of the exegetes—linguistic-focused (Zemahşerî, Taberî), theological-interpretive (Râzî), and report-focused exegesis (Kurtubî, Beydâvî, Ibn Kesîr).

Historical context

Early-period exegetes (Taberî) used reports and linguistic analysis together, while in the middle period Zemahşerî and Beydâvî placed greater emphasis on linguistic/rhetorical refinement. Râzî differentiated itself through contextual-psychological reading, while Kurtubî enriched the narrative by expanding on report details. The fundamental meaning (the Benjamin condition) remained stable throughout the periods; only the method of explanation and narrative details became more varied.

Modern connection

This verse can draw attention to the importance of using both encouragement and warning elements in a balanced way when expressing a request, and to the significance of trust and responsibility bonds within families. The brothers' effort to keep their promise to their father can be read in a way that points to the value of keeping one's word in family and society and of mutual trust. Furthermore, the fact that different exegetes address the same expression from multiple perspectives can remind us of the value of patience and multidimensional thinking in scholarly matters.

AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar