فَلَمَّا سَمِعَتْ بِمَكْرِهِنَّ أَرْسَلَتْ إِلَيْهِنَّ وَأَعْتَدَتْ لَهُنَّ مُتَّكَـًٔا وَءَاتَتْ كُلَّ وَٰحِدَةٍ مِّنْهُنَّ سِكِّينًا وَقَالَتِ ٱخْرُجْ عَلَيْهِنَّ فَلَمَّا رَأَيْنَهُۥٓ أَكْبَرْنَهُۥ وَقَطَّعْنَ أَيْدِيَهُنَّ وَقُلْنَ حَٰشَ لِلَّهِ مَا هَٰذَا بَشَرًا إِنْ هَٰذَآ إِلَّا مَلَكٌ كَرِيمٌ
“And when she heard of their sly talk, she sent to them and prepared for them a cushioned couch (to lie on at the feast) and gave to every one of them a knife and said (to Joseph): Come out unto them! And when they saw him they exalted him and cut their hands, exclaiming: Allah Blameless! This is no a human being. This is not other than some gracious angel.” — M. M. Pickthall
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, different narrations have been transmitted concerning the cutting of women's hands; some explain it as them actually cutting and dropping their hands, some as menstruation (the state of womanhood), and some as scratching wounds from distraction. The exegete notes that the most correct way is to submit to the precise wording of what Allah has informed us of, and that the cutting operation could be either complete cutting or scratching/light wounding. Furthermore, it has been transmitted that the word 'muttaka' means prepared food, drinks, and cushions to recline upon in the gathering, and the phrase 'hasha lillah' means 'ma'azallah' (may Allah protect us).
والصواب من القول في ذلك أن يقال: إن الله أخبر عنهن أنهن قطعن أيديهن، وهن لا يشعرن لإعظام يوسف، وجائز أن يكون ذلك كان قطعا بإبانة، وجائز أن يكون كان قطع حز وخدش، ولا قول في ذلك أصوب من التسليم لظاهر التنزيل
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, the women cutting their hands with knives results from them becoming bewildered and distracted upon seeing Yusuf's beauty, and unknowingly placing and cutting the hands that held the knives upon the hands they were leaning on. Furthermore, for the word 'muttaka', numerous different narrations and linguistic explanations such as a banquet gathering, a reclining cushion, food to be cut (citrus fruits, bananas, watermelons, etc.) have been listed. Yusuf's beauty has been compared to the moon on a full moon night, and hadiths and narrations related to this have been transmitted.
لأن المتكىء إذا بهت لشيء وقعت يده على يده ، ولا يبعد أن تقصد الجمع بين المكر به وبهن ، فتضع الخناجر في أيديهن ليقطعن أيديهن ، فتبكتهن بالحجة
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to this exegete, Yusuf's comparison to an angel is not from the perspective of appearance/beauty, but from the perspective of conduct (sīrah); for an angel is only an angel through his approved demeanor, not merely through appearance. Although the women's saying 'akbarnahu' (made him great) is connected by the majority to his unparalleled beauty, Râzî, on the contrary, suggests as a possibility on his part that the women might have seen in Yusuf the light of prophethood, the state of angelhood, namely the state of not paying attention to eating, drinking, and desire.
الأولى أن يكون التشبيه واقعا في السيرة لا في الصورة لأنه قال فشبهه بالملك الكريم والملك إنما يكون كريما بسيرته المرضية لا بمجرد صورته
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, in this verse Zuleikha, in response to the women's gossip about Yusuf and their slandering him, invited them to a banquet to ensnare them. She adorned her house, placed knives and citrus fruits (utrujj) before them, and suddenly presented Yusuf before them, informing that the women cut their hands in bewilderment. The women's saying 'akbarnahu' has been interpreted in different ways such as exalting/counting him, expressing amazement, or being terrified to the point of menstruation; different readings of the word 'hasha' and its linguistic usage have also been separately addressed.
فقال مجاهد عن بن عباس : إن امرأة العزيز قالت لزوجها إني أريد أن أتخذ طعاما فأدعو هؤلاء النسوة فقال لها : افعلي فاتخذت طعاما ثم نجدت لهن البيوت
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Ibn Kesîr, this verse narrates a gathering where Zuleikha invited the women through deception and placed before them citrus fruits to be cut with knives; when the women saw Yusuf, they cut their hands from amazement and terror, thinking they were actually cutting citrus fruit. According to this exegete, behind the event lies a detailed narration transmitted by Zeyd b. Eslem and hadiths informing of the extraordinary beauty given to Yusuf (half or a third of all beauty).
وجعلن يقطعن أيديهن دهشا برؤيته وهن يظنن أنهن يقطعن الأترج بالسكاكين والمراد أنهن حززن أيديهن بها قاله غير واحد
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the behavior of the women characterized as 'kayd' (deceit/stratagem) is related to Zuleikha's desire to show Yusuf to them or the women spreading her secret despite her concealing it. Furthermore, the arrangement of the gathering (muttaka, knives, the invitation of forty women) is explained both as a trap for Yusuf and as a scene leading to the women cutting their hands in bewilderment. The women's saying 'akbarnahu' upon seeing Yusuf expresses their amazement at his beauty or, according to some views, may carry a metaphorical meaning (menstruation); the phrase 'hasha lillah' is for glorifying Allah and freeing Him from deficiency and to indicate that Yusuf possessed a beauty so exalted that he could not be merely human.
سماه مكرا لأنهن أخفينه كما يخفي الماكر مكره، أو قلن ذلك لتريهن يوسف أو لأنها استكتمتهن سرها فأفشينه عليها.
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes transmit the scene of the women cutting their hands in bewilderment and amazement upon seeing Yusuf; they share a common ground of linguistic-narrative discourse in that the word 'muttaka' means banquet/food/cushions to recline upon and the phrases 'akbarnahu'/'hasha lillah' are open to different interpretations.
Differences
While Taberî and Kurtubî convey the variety in narrations (cutting, menstruation, scratching) and emphasize submission to the text, Zemahşerî and Ibn Kesîr present the event more within narrative coherence (Zuleikha's stratagem); Râzî, on the other hand, stands apart through a rational/theological approach by attributing Yusuf's superiority more to conduct and the light of prophethood than to beauty. These differences stem partly from the exegetes' methodological choices (narration-focused, linguistic, theological).
Historical context
While the early period exegete Taberî presents multiple narrations side by side and avoids expressing preference, later period exegetes (Zemahşerî, Râzî, Kurtubî, Ibn Kesîr, Beydâvî) have transformed narrations into a more systematic narrative and enriched them with linguistic and rational analyses; the basic plot has remained fixed, while interpretive depth and methodological variety have increased over time.
Modern connection
These different readings remind us that the same event can be addressed with both literal and deeper meanings, and that knowledge and the sense of wonder/perception can coexist. The state of bewilderment in the story can point to the importance of careful, measured, and deep thinking in the face of beauty and truth encountered by humans; this can be interpreted in a way that would encourage harmony between knowledge and faith in our time, and promote a patient and sincere attitude of inquiry.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar