وَشَرَوْهُ بِثَمَنٍۭ بَخْسٍ دَرَٰهِمَ مَعْدُودَةٍ وَكَانُوا۟ فِيهِ مِنَ ٱلزَّٰهِدِينَ
“And they sold him for a low price, a number of silver coins; and they attached no value to him.” — M. M. Pickthall
Fahreddin er-Râzî12-13. c.✓ Citation verified
In this text, Fahreddin er-Râzî addresses the matter of Joseph being sold by his brothers for a small price. He states that the price was paid with a small number of dirhams (twenty or twenty-two dirhams), and the reason for this was the custom of counting small amounts and weighing large amounts. He also reports that the brothers were eleven in number and divided the dirhams among themselves, but that Judah received nothing.
وعن ابن عباس كانت عشرين درهما ، وعن السدي اثنين وعشرين درهما . قالوا والإخوة كانوا أحد عشر فكل واحد منهم أخذ درهمين إلا يهوذا لم يأخذ شيئا
Kurtubî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Kurtubî, the actual purpose of those who sold Joseph (his brothers or the travelers who found him) was not to gain material profit from him, but to remove him from his father's presence; therefore, the payment they received was far below his real value, a low and insignificant price. Furthermore, various narrations and views are transmitted regarding whether the word 'bahs' means unlawful/oppression, the amount of the selling price (such as twenty, twenty-two, or forty dirhams), and that dirhams in that era were handled by counting rather than weighing. From this verse, a legal ruling is also derived regarding the permissibility of selling an important commodity for a small price and the binding nature of such a sale.
أي نقص وهو هنا مصدر وضع موضع الاسم أي باعوه بثمن مبخوس أي منقوص ولم يكن قصد إخوته ما يستفيدونه من ثمنه وإنما كان قصدهم ما يستفيدونه من خلو وجه أبيهم عنه
İbn Kesîr14. c.✓ Citation verified
Ibn Kesîr states that the people who sold Joseph were his brothers, and that the buyers were the caravan of travelers; he emphasizes that the pronoun of the verb 'sharaw' (they sold) belongs to the brothers, because when the caravan found Joseph, they rejoiced and concealed him as merchandise; if they regarded him as worthless, they would not have sold him. He says that the word 'bahs' (low value) can mean unlawful or oppression, but what is intended here is not this, because this would be a well-known matter to everyone; the actual intention is that the brothers sold him for a very low price, with deficient or counterfeit money.
فترجح من هذا أن الضمير في ( شروه ) إنما هو لأخوته وقيل المراد بقوله ( بخس ) الحرام وقيل الظلم وهذا وإن كان كذلك لكن ليس هو المراد هنا لأن هذا معلوم يعرفه كل أحد
Beydâvî13. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Beydâvî, the pronoun of the subject buying or selling Joseph is open to two possibilities: it could be his brothers or people in the caravan. The selling price called 'bahis' refers to dirhams that are deficient in quality or incomplete; their number is narrated as twenty or twenty-two dirhams. The expression 'Zâhidîn' (those who showed no interest) can apply to both the brothers and the caravan people who found and sold him; the brothers were already weary of him, while the caravan people did not value him because they made light of what they found and hastened to get rid of it, or because they thought he was an illegal slave.
بثمن بخس مبخوس لزيفه أو نقصانه. دراهم بدل من الثمن. معدودة قليلة فإنهم يزنون ما بلغ الأوقية ويعدون ما دونها. قيل كان عشرين درهما وقيل كان اثنين وعشرين درهما.
Taberî9-10. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Taberî, when Joseph's brothers sold him, they sold him for 'bahs' (a low/deficient price); this sale and transaction itself is considered unlawful. Furthermore, the word 'bahs' is explained by some exegetes as oppression and by others as fewness/worthlessness. Taberî also reports that the brothers did not value Joseph and did not know his station before Allah and his prophethood.
البخس: هو الظلم، وكان بيع يوسف وثمنه حراما عليهم
Zemahşerî12. c.✓ Citation verified
According to Zemahşerî, the price for which Joseph was sold is below value, with incomplete measure or low quality; the payment is in the currency of dirhams, not dinars. The expression 'Ma'dûde' (counted) indicates that this amount was small, because the Arabs would weigh forty dirhams (an uqiyyah), but would count amounts below that. It is narrated from Ibn Abbas that this amount was twenty dirhams, and from al-Suddi that it was twenty-two dirhams.
لأنهم كانوا لا يزنون إلا ما بلغ الأوقية وهي الأربعون ، ويعدون ما دونها
Comparison
Common ground
All exegetes agree that Joseph was sold for a low, insignificant price (in the currency of dirhams, such as twenty or twenty-two dirhams). They attribute the reason for this low price to the custom of the Arabs to count small amounts and weigh large amounts, and they commonly refer to narrations from Ibn Abbas and al-Suddi on this matter. There is also general agreement on the meaning of the word 'bahs' (low/deficient value).
Differences
Regarding who the seller and buyer were (brothers or caravan), while Fahreddin er-Râzî and Taberî emphasize the brothers, Ibn Kesîr emphasizes that the pronoun definitely belongs to the brothers; Beydâvî leaves the pronoun open to two possibilities (brothers/caravan). While Taberî connects the word 'bahs' with the meaning of oppression and unlawfulness and reports narrations about the unlawfulness of the sale, Ibn Kesîr states that this meaning is not intended here. Kurtubî stands apart from the others by adding a legal dimension to the linguistic analysis and deriving a ruling from this event regarding the binding nature of sales.
Historical context
In early exegetes like Taberî, a narration-focused method is seen, presenting various reports from the Successors side by side, while in later exegetes like Zemahşerî and Beydâvî, linguistic and rhetorical analysis comes to the forefront. In Kurtubî and Ibn Kesîr, narrations and linguistic analysis are used together, with Kurtubî further extending the text with legal derivations. The fundamental meaning (low price, dirhams, the custom of counting) remained constant through the centuries; what developed was methodological diversity and the deepening of analysis.
Modern connection
This comparison reminds us that a person's or a value's true worth often cannot be measured by the material payment given to it; it can be understood that decisions taken with jealousy or anger in social relationships and in the family can lead to underestimating what is valuable. Furthermore, the fact that exegetes approached the same issue through different methods (narration, linguistic analysis, legal derivation) can be seen as an example of a multi-faceted and patient research attitude in the scholarly tradition.
AI analysis — not a fatwa or ruling, not yet reviewed by a scholar